IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/era/eriabk/2024-rpr-16.html
   My bibliography  Save this book

Comprehensive CCUS Research Report: Storage, Value Chain, Policy & Regulation and Financing

Editor

Listed:
  • GCCSI
  • Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA)

Author

Listed:
  • GCCSI
  • ERIA (Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia)

Abstract

Carbon Capture, Utilisation, and Storage (CCUS) is a crucial technology for achieving carbon neutrality in the Asia region by 2050–2070. While many CCUS projects are currently underway globally, most are focused on Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) and Enhanced Gas Recovery (EOG), primarily led by international oil companies (IOCs) such as BP (British Petroleum). Additionally, some Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) projects are supported through public financing. To transition CCS projects to a commercial basis in the Asia region, particularly in Southeast Asia, several key issues need to be addressed: 1. Potential CO2 storage capacity, 2. Legal and policy frameworks, 3. Financial frameworks, and 4. The CO2 value chain, which connects CO2-emitting countries with CO2-storing nations. The Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA) commissioned the Global CCS Institute (GCCSI) to study these four critical areas, leveraging GCCSI’s extensive experience and expertise in CCS and CCUS. This report highlights: 1. The significant CO2 storage capacity in the ASEAN region, 2. The need for appropriate and regionally harmonised CCUS regulations, 3. The development of financing mechanisms, especially through public– private partnerships like the Joint Credit Mechanism (JCM), and 4. The establishment of an institution to support cross-border CO2 trade within the Asia region.

Suggested Citation

  • GCCSI & ERIA (Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia), 2024. "Comprehensive CCUS Research Report: Storage, Value Chain, Policy & Regulation and Financing," Books, Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA), number 2024-RPR-16 edited by GCCSI & Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA), July.
    • Handle: RePEc:era:eriabk:2024-rpr-16
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.eria.org/uploads/Comprehensive-CCUS-Research-Report.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rachel M. Krause & Sanya R. Carley & David C. Warren & John A. Rupp & John D. Graham, 2014. "“Not in (or Under) My Backyard”: Geographic Proximity and Public Acceptance of Carbon Capture and Storage Facilities," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(3), pages 529-540, March.
    2. Carola Braun, 2017. "Not in My Backyard: CCS Sites and Public Perception of CCS," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(12), pages 2264-2275, December.
    3. McCollum, David L & Ogden, Joan M, 2006. "Techno-Economic Models for Carbon Dioxide Compression, Transport, and Storage & Correlations for Estimating Carbon Dioxide Density and Viscosity," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt1zg00532, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Charles Vlek, 2018. "Induced Earthquakes from Long‐Term Gas Extraction in Groningen, the Netherlands: Statistical Analysis and Prognosis for Acceptable‐Risk Regulation," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(7), pages 1455-1473, July.
    2. Carola Braun & Christine Merk & Gert Pönitzsch & Katrin Rehdanz & Ulrich Schmidt, 2018. "Public perception of climate engineering and carbon capture and storage in Germany: survey evidence," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(4), pages 471-484, April.
    3. Farid Karimi, 2021. "Stakeholders’ Risk Perceptions of Decarbonised Energy System: Insights into Patterns of Behaviour," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-14, November.
    4. Verma, Aman & Kumar, Amit, 2015. "Life cycle assessment of hydrogen production from underground coal gasification," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 556-568.
    5. Olateju, Babatunde & Kumar, Amit, 2013. "Techno-economic assessment of hydrogen production from underground coal gasification (UCG) in Western Canada with carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) for upgrading bitumen from oil sands," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 428-440.
    6. Tello, Mario A., 2020. "Conceptualizing social impact: A geographic perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 562-571.
    7. Eric Saffou & Arshad Raza & Raoof Gholami & Ciriako Aci & Jan van Bever Donker & Sofyan Salem & Udo Zimmermann & Mimonitu Opuwari & Leon Croukamp & Walter Romaric Elingou & Tapas Chatterjee & Musa S.D, 2022. "Full‐scale simulation of a nearly depleted gas field in South Africa for carbon utilisation and storage," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 12(4), pages 486-507, August.
    8. Lorraine Whitmarsh & Dimitrios Xenias & Christopher R. Jones, 2019. "Framing effects on public support for carbon capture and storage," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 5(1), pages 1-10, December.
    9. Seyed Mehdi Alizadeh & Yasin Khalili & Mohammad Ahmadi, 2024. "Comprehensive Review of Carbon Capture and Storage Integration in Hydrogen Production: Opportunities, Challenges, and Future Perspectives," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-35, October.
    10. Edward H Owens & Samuel Chapman & Paul Allan, 2010. "The Impact of Carbon Capture and Storage on Coal Resource Depletion," Energy & Environment, , vol. 21(8), pages 925-936, December.
    11. Zeng, Bingxin & Zhu, Lei & Yao, Xing, 2020. "Policy choice for end-of-pipe abatement technology adoption under technological uncertainty," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 121-130.
    12. Hurlbert, Margot & Osazuwa-Peters, Mac, 2023. "Carbon capture and storage in Saskatchewan: An analysis of communicative practices in a contested technology," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    13. Carola Braun, 2017. "Not in My Backyard: CCS Sites and Public Perception of CCS," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(12), pages 2264-2275, December.
    14. Günther, Philipp & Ekardt, Felix, 2022. "Human Rights and Large-Scale Carbon Dioxide Removal: Potential Limits to BECCS and DACCS Deployment," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 11(12), pages 1-29.
    15. Marilou Jobin & Michael Siegrist, 2020. "Support for the Deployment of Climate Engineering: A Comparison of Ten Different Technologies," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(5), pages 1058-1078, May.
    16. Lei Zhu & Xin Liu, 2015. "Promoting the Carbon Removal in Coal Utilization-A Benefit-Risk Analysis among Full-Chain Carbon Capture and Utilization Project," Energy & Environment, , vol. 26(6-7), pages 1035-1053, November.
    17. Yao, Xing & Fan, Ying & Zhu, Lei & Zhang, Xian, 2020. "Optimization of dynamic incentive for the deployment of carbon dioxide removal technology: A nonlinear dynamic approach combined with real options," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    18. Seungkook Roh & Jin Won Lee & Qingchang Li, 2019. "Effects of Rank-Ordered Feature Perceptions of Energy Sources on the Choice of the Most Acceptable Power Plant for a Neighborhood: An Investigation Using a South Korean Nationwide Sample," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-21, March.
    19. Wang, Peng-Tao & Zhang, Yi-Xiang & Wang, Fei-Yin & Xu, Mao, 2025. "Carbon capture, utilization, and storage in China's high-emission industries: Optimal deployment under carbon neutrality goals," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 323(C).
    20. Mithran Daniel Solomon & Marcel Scheffler & Wolfram Heineken & Mostafa Ashkavand & Torsten Birth-Reichert, 2024. "Pipeline Infrastructure for CO 2 Transport: Cost Analysis and Design Optimization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-21, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:era:eriabk:2024-rpr-16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ranti Amelia The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Ranti Amelia to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eriadid.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.