IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/jumsac/294926.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Herausforderungen und Chancen bei der Bilanzierung von Kryptowährungen

Author

Listed:
  • Zapf, Anke

Abstract

In den letzten Jahren ist das mediale Interesse an dem Phänomen der digitalen (Krypto-)Währung stark gestiegen. Obwohl die Technologie kontrovers diskutiert wird, sind bereits zahlreiche Nutzungsmöglichkeiten auf dem Markt. Die damit zusammenhängenden Geschäftsvorfälle und Bestände müssen entsprechend in der Bilanz erfasst werden, wodurch die starren Bedingungen der Rechnungslegungsforschung auf eine Probe gestellt werden. Die vorliegende Arbeit beantwortet die Frage, in welchem Maß die internationalen Rechnungslegungsstandards (IFRS) in der Lage sind, die neuen Zahlungsformen bilanziell abzubilden und welche Herausforderungen und Chancen sich bei der Bilanzierung von Kryptowährungen in der Praxis ergeben können. Der Fokus dieser Arbeit liegt auf den Kryptowährungen im engeren Sinne, den sogenannten Zahlungs-Token. Die Ergebnisse werden im Zusammenhang mit der finalen Agenda-Entscheidung des IFRIC aus dem Jahr 2019 diskutiert und in einem Modell zusammenfassend dargestellt. Als Grundlage erfolgt dafür eine Unterscheidung und Einordnung von Kryptowährungen auf dem aktuellen Zahlungsmittelmarkt, sowie eine Vorstellung und Erklärung der Distributed-Ledger-Technologie (DLT) anhand der Blockchain.

Suggested Citation

  • Zapf, Anke, 2020. "Herausforderungen und Chancen bei der Bilanzierung von Kryptowährungen," Junior Management Science (JUMS), Junior Management Science e. V., vol. 5(2), pages 148-175.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:jumsac:294926
    DOI: 10.5282/jums/v5i2pp148-175
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/294926/1/5069-3273.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5282/jums/v5i2pp148-175?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. SHi, Shouyong, 1996. "A Divisible Search Model of Fiat Money," Queen's Economics Department Working Papers 273341, Queen's University - Department of Economics.
    2. Boon Seng Tan & Kin Yew Low, 2017. "Bitcoin – Its Economics for Financial Reporting," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 27(2), pages 220-227, June.
    3. Aleksander Berentsen & Fabian Schär, 2018. "A Short Introduction to the World of Cryptocurrencies," Review, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, vol. 100(1), pages 1-16.
    4. repec:eme:mfppss:mf-10-2018-0472 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Paul Davidson, 1978. "Money and the Real World," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, edition 0, number 978-1-349-15865-2, December.
    6. De Filippi, Primavera, 2014. "Bitcoin: a regulatory nightmare to a libertarian dream," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 3(2), pages 1-11.
    7. Stephen Powell, 2003. "Accounting for intangible assets: current requirements, key players and future directions," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(4), pages 797-811.
    8. Mark Bagnoli & Susan G. Watts, 2005. "Conservative Accounting Choices," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(5), pages 786-801, May.
    9. Ole†Kristian Hope, 2003. "Accounting Policy Disclosures and Analysts' Forecasts," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(2), pages 295-321, June.
    10. Shouyong Shi, 1997. "A Divisible Search Model of Fiat Money," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 65(1), pages 75-102, January.
    11. Beat Weber, 2016. "Bitcoin and the legitimacy crisis of money," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 40(1), pages 17-41.
    12. Mary Barth, 2007. "Standard-setting measurement issues and the relevance of research," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(S1), pages 7-15.
    13. Wayne Landsman, 2007. "Is fair value accounting information relevant and reliable? Evidence from capital market research," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(S1), pages 19-30.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rietz, Justin, 2019. "Secondary currency acceptance: Experimental evidence with a dual currency search model," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 403-431.
    2. Menzio, Guido & Shi, Shouyong & Sun, Hongfei, 2013. "A monetary theory with non-degenerate distributions," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 148(6), pages 2266-2312.
    3. Parthajit Kayal & Purnima Rohilla, 2021. "Bitcoin in the economics and finance literature: a survey," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 1(7), pages 1-21, July.
    4. Shouyong, Shi, 1997. "Search for a Monetary Propagation Mechanism," Queen's Economics Department Working Papers 273400, Queen's University - Department of Economics.
    5. Guillaume Rocheteau & Pierre‐Olivier Weill, 2011. "Liquidity in Frictional Asset Markets," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 43(s2), pages 261-282, October.
    6. Kiyotaki, Nobuhiro & Lagos, Ricardo & Wright, Randall, 2016. "Introduction to the symposium issue on money and liquidity," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 1-9.
    7. Lambert Jerman, 2013. "La juste valeur : une comptabilité actuarielle pour les marchés … ou les comptables ?," Post-Print hal-00991877, HAL.
    8. Shouyong Shi, 2002. "Nominal Bonds and Interest Rates: The Case of One-Period Bonds," Working Papers shouyong-03-03, University of Toronto, Department of Economics.
    9. Ritter Moritz, 2010. "The Optimum Quantity of Money Revisited: Distortionary Taxation in a Search Model of Money," The B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics, De Gruyter, vol. 10(1), pages 1-26, June.
    10. Daniel Sanches, 2016. "On the Inherent Instability of Private Money," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 20, pages 198-214, April.
    11. Berentsen, Aleksander & Monnet, Cyril, 2008. "Monetary policy in a channel system," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(6), pages 1067-1080, September.
    12. Nosal, Ed & Rocheteau, Guillaume, 2013. "Pairwise trade, asset prices, and monetary policy," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 1-17.
    13. Lagos, Ricardo, 2010. "Asset prices and liquidity in an exchange economy," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 57(8), pages 913-930, November.
    14. Kamiya, Kazuya & Kubota, So, 2025. "An analytical model of search and bargaining with divisible money," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 20(2), May.
    15. Daniela Puzzello & Konrad Podczeck, 2010. "Independent random matching with many types," 2010 Meeting Papers 652, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    16. R. O. Cavalcanti & Daniela Puzzello, 2010. "Stationarity without degeneracy in a model of commodity money," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 43(2), pages 263-280, May.
    17. Silva, Mario, 2017. "New monetarism with endogenous product variety and monopolistic competition," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 158-181.
    18. Benoît Julien & John Kennes & Ian King, 2005. "Monetary Exchange with Multilateral Matching," Discussion Papers 05-18, University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics, revised Oct 2005.
    19. Hongfei Sun & Stella Huangfu, 2011. "Private money and bank runs," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 44(3), pages 859-879, August.
    20. Trejos, Alberto & Wright, Randall, 2016. "Search-based models of money and finance: An integrated approach," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 10-31.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:jumsac:294926. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://jums.academy/en/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.