IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/indbez/268821.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Branchenspezifische Interessen an der Allgemeinverbindlicherklärung in Deutschland
[Explaining sector-specific interests in the extension of collective bargaining agreements in Germany]

Author

Listed:
  • Günther, Wolfgang

Abstract

Die Allgemeinverbindlicherklärung von Tarifverträgen (AVE) kann ein Mittel darstellen, die Tarifbindung zu stabilisieren. Inzwischen ist viel über die AVE-Praxis einzelner Länder bekannt, wenig jedoch über die AVE auf Branchenebene. Der Beitrag untersucht die Verteilung der AVE zwischen Branchen in Deutschland. In einem most-similar-design vergleicht er, wie Arbeitgeberverbände und Gewerkschaften im Baugewerbe, im Einzelhandel und im Wach- und Sicherheitsgewerbe mit der AVE umgehen und welche Interessen sie dabei verfolgen. Datenbasis sind die offiziellen AVE-Verzeichnisse, Verbandspublikationen und Interviews mit Vertreterinnen und Vertretern von Gewerkschaften und Arbeitgeberverbänden. Es wird herausgearbeitet, dass die Akteure deshalb ein Interesse an der AVE haben, weil das Instrument Unterbietungswettbewerb einzudämmen hilft. Ob sich das Interesse durchsetzt, hängt allerdings ab von strategischen verbandspolitischen Entscheidungen. Darüber hinaus bestehen branchenspezifische Motive wie der Schutz der sozialpartnerschaftlichen Sozialkassen im Baugewerbe oder das Bemühen im Wach- und Sicherheitsgewerbe, die Attraktivität der Branche zu steigern. Im Einzelhandel führten hingegen die Unzufriedenheit mit bestehenden Tarifinstitutionen sowie hohe Wettbewerbsintensität zur Auflösung der Tarifbindung, der AVE und damit der klassenübergreifenden Koalition.

Suggested Citation

  • Günther, Wolfgang, 2020. "Branchenspezifische Interessen an der Allgemeinverbindlicherklärung in Deutschland [Explaining sector-specific interests in the extension of collective bargaining agreements in Germany]," Industrielle Beziehungen. Zeitschrift für Arbeit, Organisation und Management, Verlag Barbara Budrich, vol. 27(4), pages 415-436.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:indbez:268821
    DOI: 10.3224/indbez.v27i4.04
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/268821/1/indbez-v27i4-04.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3224/indbez.v27i4.04?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thorsten Schulten & Reinhard Bispinck, 2013. "Stabileres Tarifvertragssystem durch Stärkung der Allgemeinverbindlicherklärung?," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 93(11), pages 758-764, October.
    2. Asshoff, Gregor, 2012. "Sozial- und tarifpolitische Bedeutung der Allgemeinverbindlicherklärung von Tarifverträgen im Baugewerbe," WSI-Mitteilungen, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 65(7), pages 541-546.
    3. Schmitter, Philippe C. & Streeck, Wolfgang, 1999. "The organization of business interests: Studying the associative action of business in advanced industrial societies," MPIfG Discussion Paper 99/1, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kenworthy, Lane, 2000. "Quantitative indicators of corporatism: A survey and assessment," MPIfG Discussion Paper 00/4, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    2. Sophie Jacquot & Cornelia Woll, 2003. "Usage of European Integration - Europeanisation from a Sociological Perspective," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-01019642, HAL.
    3. Plehwe, Dieter & Schlögl, Matthias, 2014. "Europäische und zivilgesellschaftliche Hintergründe der euro(pa)skeptischen Partei Alternative für Deutschland (AfD)," Discussion Papers, Project Group Modes of Economic Governance SP III 2014-501, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    4. Gustav A. Horn & Jan Behringer & Sebastian Gechert & Katja Rietzler & Ulrike Stein, 2017. "Was tun gegen die Ungleichheit?," IMK Report 129-2017, IMK at the Hans Boeckler Foundation, Macroeconomic Policy Institute.
    5. Adriana Bunea, 2015. "Sharing ties and preferences: Stakeholders’ position alignments in the European Commission’s open consultations," European Union Politics, , vol. 16(2), pages 281-299, June.
    6. Sophie Jacquot & Cornelia Woll, 2003. "Usage of European Integration - Europeanisation from a Sociological Perspective," Post-Print hal-01019642, HAL.
    7. Joost Berkhout & Jan Beyers & Marcel Hanegraaff, 2023. "The Representative Potential of Interest Groups: Internal Voice in Post-Communist and Western European Countries," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(1), pages 50-64.
    8. Behringer, Jan & Gechert, Sebastian & Horn, Gustav A. & Rietzler, Katja & Stein, Ulrike & Tiefensee, Anita, 2017. "Schriftliche Stellungnahme zur öffentlichen Anhörung des Sozialausschusses des Landtags Mecklenburg-Vorpommern am 29. November 2017 zum Thema "Armut und Reichtum" (Ausschussdrucksache 7/225)," WSI Policy Briefs 18, The Institute of Economic and Social Research (WSI), Hans Böckler Foundation.
    9. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/8528 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Marta Martínez Matute & Pedro S. Martins, 2022. "How representative are social partners in Europe? The role of dissimilarity," LABOUR, CEIS, vol. 36(4), pages 424-444, December.
    11. Caleb Goods & Bradon Ellem, 2023. "Employer associations: Climate change, power and politics," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 44(2), pages 481-503, May.
    12. Ewald Engelen, 2004. "Problems of Descriptive Representation in Dutch Works Councils," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 52(3), pages 491-507, October.
    13. Cornelia Woll, 2005. "The Difficult Organization of Business Interests. MEDEF and the Political Representation of French Firms," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-01065609, HAL.
    14. Michael Barry & Adrian Wilkinson, 2011. "Reconceptualising employer associations under evolving employment relations," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 25(1), pages 149-162, March.
    15. Calì, Massimiliano & Sen, Kunal, 2011. "Do Effective State Business Relations Matter for Economic Growth? Evidence from Indian States," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 39(9), pages 1542-1557, September.
    16. Plehwe, Dieter, 2019. "Einleitung: Lobbyismus und Demokratie," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, pages 1-12.
    17. Ali İhsan BALCI & Mehmet GÜLER, 2019. "Avrupa İşçi Sendikaları Konfederasyonunun (ETUC) Küreselleşme Bağlamında Değerlendirilmesi," Journal of Social Policy Conferences, Istanbul University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 0(77), pages 383-420, December.
    18. Auffenberg, Jennie & Kittel, Bernhard, 2015. "Negotiating reforms in the public services: Trajectories of new public management policies in the Swedish and French police forces," TranState Working Papers 188, University of Bremen, Collaborative Research Center 597: Transformations of the State.
    19. Mas, José M. & Gómez, Andrés, 2021. "Social partners in the digital ecosystem: Will business organizations, trade unions and government organizations survive the digital revolution?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    20. Luigi Burroni & Maarten Keune & Guglielmo Meardi, 2012. "Introduction," Chapters, in: Luigi Burroni & Maarten Keune & Guglielmo Meardi (ed.), Economy and Society in Europe, chapter 1, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    21. Barber Benjamin & Weschle Simon & Pierskalla Jan, 2014. "Lobbying and the collective action problem: comparative evidence from enterprise surveys," Business and Politics, De Gruyter, vol. 16(2), pages 1-26, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Tarifverhandlungen; Allgemeinverbindlicherklärung von Tarifverträgen; Arbeitgeberverbände; Gewerkschaften; Lohnwettbewerb; collective bargaining; extension of collective agreements; employers' associations; trade unions; wage competition;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J51 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Labor-Management Relations, Trade Unions, and Collective Bargaining - - - Trade Unions: Objectives, Structure, and Effects
    • J52 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Labor-Management Relations, Trade Unions, and Collective Bargaining - - - Dispute Resolution: Strikes, Arbitration, and Mediation
    • J30 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:indbez:268821. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.budrich-journals.de/index.php/indbez/index .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.