Author
Listed:
- Salomo, Katja
- Pfaff, Theresa
- Ruhrort, Lisa
- Zehl, Franziska
Abstract
As cars account for about one sixth of all greenhouse gas emissions in Germany, a sustainable transformation of the German transport system is essential to combat climate change. However, effective policies to reduce private car use are often broadly unpopular. To better understand why, we conducted a representative survey of residents in two densely populated Berlin neighborhoods with extensive public transportation infrastructure in 2021 (N = 1041). With the help of the local municipality, we constructed three hypothetical scenarios (vignettes) of varying intrusiveness in restricting parking and other spatial privileges of private cars. We aim to identify the role of different individual-level factors for the acceptance of such policy measures: individual affectedness (habits of using private cars and other modes of transport), awareness of local problems caused by motorized private transport, general eco-consciousness, socio-economic status, and fear of rising rents in the neighborhood caused by the proposed policies. We find that individual affectedness, fear of rising rents, eco-consciousness, and, to a lesser extent local problem awareness explain about 56 % of the variation in residents' support for the policy. The socioeconomic status of residents (income, educational attainment, relative deprivation) is not an effective indicator of how they perceive car-restrictive policies. The fear of rising rents has not been widely acknowledged as a factor driving resistance to car-restrictive policies, and thus merits greater attention from both researchers and politicians.
Suggested Citation
Salomo, Katja & Pfaff, Theresa & Ruhrort, Lisa & Zehl, Franziska, 2026.
"Support for car-restrictive policies between individual affectedness, eco-consciousness, and fear of ecological gentrification. Evidence from a vignette analysis in Berlin,"
EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 130, pages 1-10.
Handle:
RePEc:zbw:espost:341389
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2025.104441
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:341389. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/zbwkide.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.