IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/espost/336450.html

Accountability as a function of power relationships in public governance networks

Author

Listed:
  • Eckersley, Peter
  • Lakoma, Katarzyna
  • Murphy, Pete
  • Caygill, Tom
  • Pell, Charlotte

Abstract

In public governance, power and accountability are inextricably linked. However, although an integrated exploration of these concepts could enhance our understanding of how governance operates, few studies have examined them together. Drawing on resource dependency theory, we suggest that power relationships within networks shape accountability and have a concomitant impact on the prevailing governance paradigm. Specifically, where principals possess important resources that enable them to exercise power over agents and hold them to account through hierarchical mechanisms, Traditional Public Administration approaches predominate. Where resources are diffused within elite networks in New Public Management contexts, individual actors can exercise greater power to achieve their objectives, and accountability arrangements become increasingly multidirectional and complex. Finally, if resources are shared across society as in the New Public Governance paradigm, actors generate power with each other to achieve shared goals, and accountability relationships are more horizontal with a focus on learning.

Suggested Citation

  • Eckersley, Peter & Lakoma, Katarzyna & Murphy, Pete & Caygill, Tom & Pell, Charlotte, 2024. "Accountability as a function of power relationships in public governance networks," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 103(3), pages 906-922.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:336450
    DOI: 10.1111/padm.13032
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/336450/1/Accountability-as-a-function-of-power-relationships.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/padm.13032?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Keith Dowding, 2006. "Three‐Dimensional Power: A Discussion of Steven Lukes’ Power: A Radical View," Political Studies Review, Political Studies Association, vol. 4(2), pages 136-145, May.
    2. repec:eme:aaaj00:09513579810231439 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Bachrach, Peter & Baratz, Morton S., 1963. "Decisions and Nondecisions: An Analytical Framework," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 57(3), pages 632-642, September.
    4. Marija Aleksovska & Thomas Schillemans & Stephan Grimmelikhuijsen, 2019. "Lessons from five decades of experimental and behavioral research on accountability: A systematic literature review," Journal of Behavioral Public Administration, Center for Experimental and Behavioral Public Administration, vol. 2(2).
    5. Jane Broadbent & Richard Laughlin, 1998. "Resisting the “new public management”: Absorption and absorbing groups in schools and GP practices in the UK," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 11(4), pages 403-435, October.
    6. Carmine Bianchi & Greta Nasi & William C. Rivenbark, 2021. "Implementing collaborative governance: models, experiences, and challenges," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(11), pages 1581-1589, November.
    7. Peter Eckersley, 2017. "A new framework for understanding subnational policy-making and local choice," Policy Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(1), pages 76-90, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Frimpong Boamah, Emmanuel, 2018. "Constitutional economics of Ghana’s decentralization," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 256-267.
    2. Abdelghani Koura & Abdeslam Boudhar & Mohamed Oudgou, 2024. "Convergence of public policies: Aligning policies and actors for sustainable financing of Moroccan SMEs—MACTOR analysis," Post-Print hal-04719058, HAL.
    3. Scharpf, Fritz W., 2014. "No exit from the euro-rescuing trap?," MPIfG Discussion Paper 14/4, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    4. Jeffry Frieden & Stefanie Walter, 2019. "Analyzing inter-state negotiations in the Eurozone crisis and beyond," European Union Politics, , vol. 20(1), pages 134-151, March.
    5. Francesca Imperiale & Alessandro Sancino & Roberta Fasiello & Paolo Ricci, 2024. "Governing public heritage assets with civil society: exploring the typologies of collaboration by the dominant actor," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 28(4), pages 1151-1197, December.
    6. Felix Strebel & Thomas Widmer, 2012. "Visibility and facticity in policy diffusion: going beyond the prevailing binarity," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 45(4), pages 385-398, December.
    7. Joao A. Ribeiro & Robert W. Scapens, 2004. "Power, ERP systems and resistance to management accounting: a case study," FEP Working Papers 141, Universidade do Porto, Faculdade de Economia do Porto.
    8. Peter Mascini & Eelco Van Wijk, 2009. "Responsive regulation at the Dutch Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority: An empirical assessment of assumptions underlying the theory," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 3(1), pages 27-47, March.
    9. Maarten Wolsink, 2020. "Framing in Renewable Energy Policies: A Glossary," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-31, June.
    10. Monasso, Ton & van Leijden, Fabian, 2007. "Telecommunication regulation as a game: deepening theoretical understanding," MPRA Paper 7625, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. HaeRan Shin, 2016. "Re-making a place-of-memory: The competition between representativeness and place-making knowledge in Gwangju, South Korea," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(16), pages 3566-3583, December.
    12. Mark Thatcher, 1998. "The Development of Policy Network Analyses," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 10(4), pages 389-416, October.
    13. Jean-Pascal Gond & Luciano Barin Cruz & Emmanuel Raufflet & Mathieu Charron, 2016. "To Frack or Not to Frack? The Interaction of Justification and Power in a Sustainability Controversy," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(3), pages 330-363, May.
    14. Dewey, Matías & Woll, Cornelia & Ronconi, Lucas, 2021. "The political economy of law enforcement," MaxPo Discussion Paper Series 21/1, Max Planck Sciences Po Center on Coping with Instability in Market Societies (MaxPo).
    15. Junk, Julian & Blatter, Joachim, 2010. "Transnational attention, domestic agenda-setting and international agreement: Modeling necessary and sufficient conditions for media-driven humanitarian interventions [Transnationale Aufmerksamkeit, nationales Agenda-Setting und Internationales Ab," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Global Governance SP IV 2010-301, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    16. Edgar Quispe-Mamani & Pascual Ayamamani-Collanqui, 2023. "Unitarian Illusion in Peru: Recentralization and Intergovernmental Conflicts from the Perspective of Local Governments," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 985-1000, September.
    17. Harald Wiese, 2009. "Applying cooperative game theory to power relations," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 43(4), pages 519-533, July.
    18. Paula Jarzabkowski & Sarah Kaplan, 2015. "Strategy tools-in-use: A framework for understanding “technologies of rationality” in practice," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(4), pages 537-558, April.
    19. Elliott Sclar, 2021. "The Infinite Elasticity of Air: New York City’s Financialization of Transferable Development Rights," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 80(2), pages 353-380, March.
    20. Khoury, Rana B. & Scott, Emily K.M., 2024. "Going local without localization: Power and humanitarian response in the Syrian war," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:336450. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/zbwkide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.