IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/econso/223121.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How much is your health worth? A research agenda on valuation processes and markets for medicines

Author

Listed:
  • Nouguez, Etienne

Abstract

The stakes around the global and national medicines markets have been rising steadily for the last twenty years. From the controversies over patents surrounding HIV treatments and the right of developing countries to infringe these patents and develop generic copies in the late 1990s ('t Hoen 2002; Coriat 2008), to the current debates over the exorbitant prices of certain medicines and the sustainability of the expenditure they generate for national health insurance (Vogler et al. 2016), or, in the current context of the Covid-19 pandemic, over supply disruptions and struggles between countries to access treatments, tests, and protective masks - medicines and health products raise a series of fundamental questions.

Suggested Citation

  • Nouguez, Etienne, 2020. "How much is your health worth? A research agenda on valuation processes and markets for medicines," economic sociology. perspectives and conversations, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, vol. 21(3), pages 11-19.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:econso:223121
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/223121/1/Econsoc-NL-21-3-02.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lucien Karpik, 2010. "Valuing the Unique: The Economics of Singularities," Economics Books, Princeton University Press, edition 1, number 9215.
    2. Beckert, Jens & Aspers, Patrik (ed.), 2011. "The Worth of Goods: Valuation and Pricing in the Economy," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199594658, Decembrie.
    3. Beckert, Jens & Musselin, Christine (ed.), 2013. "Constructing Quality: The Classification of Goods in Markets," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199677573, Decembrie.
    4. Matthieu Montalban & Mustafa Erdem Sakinç, 2013. "Financialization and productive models in the pharmaceutical industry," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 22(4), pages 981-1030, August.
    5. Nouguez, Etienne, 2014. "Governing the market through prices: The state and controls on the price of medicines in France," economic sociology. perspectives and conversations, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, vol. 15(2), pages 41-48.
    6. Viviana A. Zelizer, 2013. "Economic Lives: How Culture Shapes the Economy," Economics Books, Princeton University Press, edition 1, number 9297.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gerhard Rainer, 2021. "Geographies of qualification in the global fine wine market," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(1), pages 95-112, February.
    2. Beckert, Jens & Rössel, Jörg & Schenk, Patrick, 2014. "Wine as a cultural product: Symbolic capital and price formation in the wine field," MPIfG Discussion Paper 14/2, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    3. Bronk, Richard & Beckert, Jens, 2022. "The instability of preferences: Uncertain futures and the incommensurable and intersubjective nature of value(s)," MPIfG Discussion Paper 22/1, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    4. Neil Pollock & Duncan Chapple & Suwen Chen & Luciana D’Adderrio, 2023. "The Valorising Pitch: How Digital Start‐ups Leverage Intermediary Coverage," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(2), pages 346-371, March.
    5. Plante, Maude & Free, Clinton & Andon, Paul, 2021. "Making artworks valuable: Categorisation and modes of valuation work," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    6. Pollock, Neil & D’Adderio, Luciana, 2012. "Give me a two-by-two matrix and I will create the market: Rankings, graphic visualisations and sociomateriality," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 37(8), pages 565-586.
    7. Lutter, Mark, 2014. "Creative success and network embeddedness: Explaining critical recognition of film directors in Hollywood, 1900-2010," MPIfG Discussion Paper 14/11, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    8. Galina Kallio, 2020. "A carrot isn’t a carrot isn’t a carrot: tracing value in alternative practices of food exchange," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 37(4), pages 1095-1109, December.
    9. Wehinger, Frank, 2014. "Falsche Werte: Nachfrage nach Modeplagiaten," MPIfG Discussion Paper 14/20, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    10. Kornberger, Martin & Pflueger, Dane & Mouritsen, Jan, 2017. "Evaluative infrastructures: Accounting for platform organization," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 79-95.
    11. Erwin Dekker, 2015. "Two approaches to study the value of art and culture, and the emergence of a third," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 39(4), pages 309-326, November.
    12. Erwin Dekker, 2018. "M. Bianchi’s and R. Patalano’s: Storytelling and Choice," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 42(3), pages 521-523, August.
    13. Hutter, Michael, 2021. "Three Modes of Valuation Practices in Art Games," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 8(1), pages 85-119.
    14. Marin, Alejandra & Dass, Mayukh & Boal, Kimberly, 2019. "Critic-buyer effects on valuation of ambiguously appraised products," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 45-55.
    15. Wilkinson, John, 2019. "An overview of German new economic sociology and the contribution of the Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies," MPIfG Discussion Paper 19/3, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    16. Kornberger Martin & Pflueger Dane & Mouritsen Jan, 2017. "Evaluative infrastructures : Accounting for platform organization," Post-Print hal-02276737, HAL.
    17. Beckert, Jens, 2012. "Capitalism as a system of contingent expectations: Toward a sociological microfoundation of political economy," MPIfG Discussion Paper 12/4, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    18. Hussain, Simon & Liu, Lana Yan Jun & Miller, Anthony D., 2020. "Accounting as a dichotomised discipline: An analysis of the source materials used in the construction of accounting articles," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    19. Lutter, Mark, 2012. "Soziale Strukturen des Erfolgs: Winner-take-all-Prozesse in der Kreativwirtschaft," MPIfG Discussion Paper 12/7, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    20. Verena Brinks, 2016. "Situated affect and collective meaning: A community perspective on processes of value creation and commercialization in enthusiast-driven fields," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 48(6), pages 1152-1169, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:econso:223121. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mpigfde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.