IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/indcch/v22y2013i4p981-1030.html

Financialization and productive models in the pharmaceutical industry

Author

Listed:
  • Matthieu Montalban
  • Mustafa Erdem Sakinç

Abstract

This study analyzes the effects of financialization and competition on productive models in major pharmaceutical and biopharmaceutical companies and discusses current theses, which may help explain the transformation of productive models occurring under growing pressure from institutional investors and shareholder value management. We provide evidence of a large dispersion of shareholding and an increase in distribution of shareholder value occurring through large pharmaceutical companies. We show that large pharmaceutical companies have adopted a blockbuster model in an effort to maximize shareholder value, which is explained by various factors including financialization, technical change, product market regulations, and market competition. The stock market is used to make large acquisitions and control the US drug market, creating a growing dependency on stock performance and blockbuster drug sales. We describe how the process of financialization has impacted the biopharmaceutical industry and argue that the blockbuster model as a dominant productive model for the industry since the 1990s is unsustainable. Copyright 2013 The Author 2013. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Associazione ICC. All rights reserved., Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Matthieu Montalban & Mustafa Erdem Sakinç, 2013. "Financialization and productive models in the pharmaceutical industry," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 22(4), pages 981-1030, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:indcch:v:22:y:2013:i:4:p:981-1030
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/icc/dtt023
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or

    for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:indcch:v:22:y:2013:i:4:p:981-1030. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/icc .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.