IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zag/busexc/v12y2018i2p59-69.html

Priorities Regarding The Management Of Public Utility Services In The Western Region Of Romania

Author

Listed:
  • Oana-Ramona Lobont

    (Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, West University of Timișoara, Timișoara, Romania)

  • Alexandru Bociu

    (Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, West University of Timișoara, Timișoara, Romania)

  • Nicoleta-Claudia Moldovan

    (Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, West University of Timișoara, Timișoara, Romania)

  • Iulia Para

    (Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, West University of Timișoara, Timișoara, Romania)

Abstract

Public utility services are an important vector for the development of regional and local communities. Providing these services is equally important to citizens, central, regional and local authorities, and academics. The management of public utility services needs to be completed in the spirit of an efficient and performant process. This paper highlights the perception of the users of public utility services regarding the quality of various public services. Also, it identifies potential improvement measures that can be adopted by the authorities with competences in the field of utility services. In this respect, we apply a methodology based on the survey method, considering a sample of 220 respondents, between December 2014 and April 2015 at the level of the Western Region of Romania, namely the counties of Timis, Caras-Severin, Arad and Hunedoara. The main conclusion of the study reveals users’ dissatisfaction with the quality of public utility services provision, as well as the lack of communication between authorities and citizens.The results of the present paper can form a basis for well-grounded proposals for efficient measures which need to be implemented by local and regional authorities in order to improve the provision of public utility services.

Suggested Citation

  • Oana-Ramona Lobont & Alexandru Bociu & Nicoleta-Claudia Moldovan & Iulia Para, 2018. "Priorities Regarding The Management Of Public Utility Services In The Western Region Of Romania," Poslovna izvrsnost-Business Excellence, University of Zagreb Faculty of Economics & Business, vol. 12(2), pages 59-69.
    • Handle: RePEc:zag:busexc:v:12:y:2018:i:2:p:59-69
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/315004
    Download Restriction: None
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tim Coelli & Antonio Estache & Sergio Perelman & Lourdes Trujillo, 2003. "A Primer on Efficiency Measurement for Utilities and Transport Regulators," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 15149, April.
    2. Lawrence O. Mbeng & Jane Probert & Paul S. Phillips & Roy Fairweather, 2009. "Assessing Public Attitudes and Behaviour to Household Waste Management in Cameroon to Drive Strategy Development: A Q Methodological Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 1(3), pages 1-17, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mariani Abdul-Majid & David Saal & Giuliana Battisti, 2011. "The impact of Islamic banking on the cost efficiency and productivity change of Malaysian commercial banks," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(16), pages 2033-2054.
    2. Mehdi Farsi & Aurelio Fetz & Massimo Filippini, 2007. "Benchmarking and Regulation in the Electricity Distribution Sector," CEPE Working paper series 07-54, CEPE Center for Energy Policy and Economics, ETH Zurich.
    3. Luc Baumstark & Claude Ménard & William Roy & Anne Yvrande-Billon, 2005. "Modes de gestion et efficience des opérateurs dans le secteur des transports urbains de personnes," Post-Print halshs-00103116, HAL.
    4. Walter, Matthias & Cullmann, Astrid & von Hirschhausen, Christian & Wand, Robert & Zschille, Michael, 2009. "Quo vadis efficiency analysis of water distribution? A comparative literature review," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 17(3-4), pages 225-232, September.
    5. Kumbhakar, Subal C. & Wang, Hung-Jen, 2006. "Pitfalls in the estimation of a cost function that ignores allocative inefficiency: A Monte Carlo analysis," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 134(2), pages 317-340, October.
    6. Anne-Kathrin Last & Heike Wetzel, 2009. "Effizienzmessverfahren – eine Einführung," Working Paper Series in Economics 145, University of Lüneburg, Institute of Economics.
    7. C. P. Barros & O. H. dos S. Figueiredo & Silvestre Dumbo, 2016. "A performance assessment of the Angolan soccer league," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(29), pages 2711-2720, June.
    8. Sangeeta Bansal & Massimo Filippini & Suchita Srinivasan, 2023. "How Regulation Might Fail to Reduce Energy Consumption While Still Stimulating Total Factor Productivity Growth," CER-ETH Economics working paper series 23/379, CER-ETH - Center of Economic Research (CER-ETH) at ETH Zurich.
    9. Latruffe, Laure & Bravo-Ureta, Boris E. & Moreira, Victor H. & Desjeux, Yann & Dupraz, Pierre, 2011. "Productivity and Subsidies in European Union Countries: An Analysis for Dairy Farms Using Input Distance Frontiers," 2011 International Congress, August 30-September 2, 2011, Zurich, Switzerland 114396, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    10. Barros, Carlos Pestana & Wanke, Peter, 2015. "An analysis of African airlines efficiency with two-stage TOPSIS and neural networks," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 44, pages 90-102.
    11. Paul Rouse & Robert Swales, 2006. "Pricing public health care services using DEA: Methodology versus politics," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 145(1), pages 265-280, July.
    12. N�stor A. Le Clech & Carmen Fillat Castej�n, 2017. "Productivity, efficiency and technical change in world agriculture: a f�re-primont index approach," Documentos de Trabajo dt2017-09, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales, Universidad de Zaragoza.
    13. Lin, Chen, 2005. "Service quality and prospects for benchmarking: Evidence from the Peru water sector," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 13(3), pages 230-239, September.
    14. Anthony J. Glass & Karligash Kenjegalieva & Robin Sickles, 2012. "The Effects of Efficiency and TFP Growth on Nitrogen and Sulphur Emissions in Europe: A Multistage Spatial Analysis," Discussion Paper Series 2012_11, Department of Economics, Loughborough University, revised Oct 2012.
    15. Girma Jirata Duguma & Jiqin Han, 2021. "Effect of deposit mobilization on the technical efficiency of rural saving and credit cooperatives: Evidence from Ethiopia," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 92(4), pages 621-647, December.
    16. Livingstone Senyonga & Olvar Bergland, 2018. "Impact of High-Powered Incentive Regulations on Efficiency and Productivity Growth of Norwegian Electricity Utilities," The Energy Journal, , vol. 39(5), pages 231-256, September.
    17. Andrés Gómez-Lobo, 2003. "Determinación de la eficiencia operativa en la regulación de monopolios naturales: el uso de información de consultores versus competencia por comparaciones," Working Papers wp204, University of Chile, Department of Economics.
    18. Freitas, C.O.D. & Silva, F.F. & Braga, M.J., 2018. "The effect of rural extension on farm technical efficiency in Brazil," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277271, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    19. Mohamad, Noorihsan, 2014. "Telecommunications reform and efficiency performance: Do good institutions matter?," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 49-65.
    20. Freitas, Carlos Otavio de & Silva, Felipe de Figueiredo & Braga, Marcelo Jose & Neves, Mateus de Carvalho Reis, . "Rural extension and technical efficiency in the Brazilian agricultural sector," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 24(2).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zag:busexc:v:12:y:2018:i:2:p:59-69. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dario Dunković (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fefzghr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.