IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wsi/jikmxx/v18y2019i03ns0219649219500308.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Revisit of the Learning Organisation: Is It Time?

Author

Listed:
  • Alaina M. Doyle

    (College of Information, University of North Texas, Denton, TX 76201, USA)

  • Karen R. Johnson

    (College of Information, University of North Texas, Denton, TX 76201, USA)

Abstract

The learning organisation (LO) phenomenon was created over 25 years ago. Several definitions of the LO have evolved as well as frameworks, features, and characteristics. One of the challenges of the LO’s credibility was the impetus of the creation of empirical methods. The LO theory has stabilised with the involvement of human resource (HR) researchers to bridge the gap between theory and practice. However, in a rapidly changing, complex, diverse, and competitive work environment, now may be the opportune time to further investigate the scope of the LO. The study examines the utility of the LO definitions and frameworks in relation to shifts in the environment to determine if the concept continues to withstand the landscape of the current workplace and beyond. The importance of creating an LO continues to be top priority in numerous organisational industries and communities and its reach is expanding to a variety of populations. However, the LO concept does not necessarily address constantly changing and complex workplace work demands. Therefore, a new definition of the LO is proposed. Recommendations for future studies and implications for HR research and practice are included.

Suggested Citation

  • Alaina M. Doyle & Karen R. Johnson, 2019. "A Revisit of the Learning Organisation: Is It Time?," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(03), pages 1-11, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:wsi:jikmxx:v:18:y:2019:i:03:n:s0219649219500308
    DOI: 10.1142/S0219649219500308
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S0219649219500308
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1142/S0219649219500308?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jyoti Jagasia & Utpal Baul & Debasis Mallik, 2015. "A Framework for Communities of Practice in Learning Organizations," Business Perspectives and Research, , vol. 3(1), pages 1-20, January.
    2. Dora M. Raymaker, 2016. "Intersections of Critical Systems Thinking and Community Based Participatory Research: A Learning Organization Example with the Autistic Community," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 29(5), pages 405-423, October.
    3. Ankita Tiwari & Kashmeera Prabhu & Rhea Doshi, 2015. "Transforming BASF into a Learning Organization, Linking the Present with the Future," Business Perspectives and Research, , vol. 3(1), pages 66-80, January.
    4. Masood Nawaz Kalyar & Nosheen Rafi, 2013. "'Organizational learning culture': an ingenious device for promoting firm's innovativeness," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(12), pages 1135-1147, September.
    5. Georg Schreyögg & Jörg Sydow, 2010. "CROSSROADS---Organizing for Fluidity? Dilemmas of New Organizational Forms," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(6), pages 1251-1262, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yildiz, H. Emre & Murtic, Adis & Zander, Udo, 2024. "Re-conceptualizing absorptive capacity: The importance of teams as a meso-level context," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    2. Dominik M. Wielgos & Christian Homburg & Christina Kuehnl, 2021. "Digital business capability: its impact on firm and customer performance," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 49(4), pages 762-789, July.
    3. Lise Arena & Anthony Hussenot, 2021. "From Innovations at Work to Innovative Ways of Conceptualizing Organization: A Brief History of Organization Studies," Post-Print hal-03290300, HAL.
    4. Deist, Maximilian K. & McDowell, William C. & Bouncken, Ricarda B., 2023. "Digital units and digital innovation: Balancing fluidity and stability for the Creation, Conversion, and Dissemination of sticky knowledge," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    5. Michael Grothe-Hammer & Héloïse Berkowitz & Olivier Berthod, 2022. "Decisional organization theory: towards an integrated framework of organization," Post-Print hal-03699112, HAL.
    6. Dolata, Ulrich & Schrape, Jan-Felix, 2022. "Platform architectures: The structuration of platform companies on the Internet," Research Contributions to Organizational Sociology and Innovation Studies, SOI Discussion Papers 2022-01, University of Stuttgart, Institute for Social Sciences, Department of Organizational Sociology and Innovation Studies.
    7. Xiaoping Chen & Hongming Xie & Huanhuai Zhou, 2024. "Incremental versus Radical Innovation and Sustainable Competitive Advantage: A Moderated Mediation Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-18, May.
    8. Lerch, Christian M. & Horvat, Djerdj & Jasny, Johannes, 2024. "When manufacturers turn into digital platform providers: A transformation model to understand the platformization pathway," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    9. Ricarda B. Bouncken & Sascha Kraus, 2022. "Entrepreneurial ecosystems in an interconnected world: emergence, governance and digitalization," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 1-14, January.
    10. Kaur, Sarabjot & Gupta, Shivam & Singh, Sanjay Kumar & Perano, Mirko, 2019. "Organizational ambidexterity through global strategic partnerships: A cognitive computing perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 43-54.
    11. Lydia Nanjala Nyongesa & Fred Gichana Atandi, 2024. "Navigating Economic Transformations: Accounting for Paradigm Shifts in Post Covid-19 in Listed Companies in NSE, Kenya," International Journal of Latest Technology in Engineering, Management & Applied Science, International Journal of Latest Technology in Engineering, Management & Applied Science (IJLTEMAS), vol. 13(4), pages 161-171, April.
    12. Wolfgang H. Güttel & Stefan Konlechner & Barbara Müller, 2012. "Entscheidungsmuster und Veränderungsarchitekturen in Wandelprozessen: Eine Dynamic Capabilities-Perspektive," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 64(6), pages 630-654, September.
    13. Alfredo De Massis & Josip Kotlar & Mike Wright & Franz W. Kellermanns, 2018. "Sector-Based Entrepreneurial Capabilities and the Promise of Sector Studies in Entrepreneurship," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 42(1), pages 3-23, January.
    14. Accard, Philippe, 2015. "Complex hierarchy: The strategic advantages of a trade-off between hierarchical supervision and self-organizing," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 89-103.
    15. Eileen Bridges, 2014. "What is truth?," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(1), pages 1-4, January.
    16. Mohammad Asim & Saboohi Nasim, 2022. "Modeling Enterprise Flexibility and Competitiveness for Indian Pharmaceutical Firms: A Qualitative Study," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 23(4), pages 551-571, December.
    17. Vedel, Jane Bjørn & Kokshagina, Olga, 2021. "How firms undertake organizational changes to shift to more-exploratory strategies: A process perspective," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(1).
    18. Kanika Khurana & Atanu Ghosh, 2023. "Management in the Performing Arts: An Empirical Exploration of Organizational Structures in Indian Theatre," IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review, , vol. 12(1), pages 67-84, January.
    19. Dolata, Ulrich, 2017. "Technological innovations and the transformation of economic sectors: A concise overview of issues and concepts," Research Contributions to Organizational Sociology and Innovation Studies, SOI Discussion Papers 2018-01, University of Stuttgart, Institute for Social Sciences, Department of Organizational Sociology and Innovation Studies.
    20. Järvi, Kati & Almpanopoulou, Argyro & Ritala, Paavo, 2018. "Organization of knowledge ecosystems: Prefigurative and partial forms," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(8), pages 1523-1537.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wsi:jikmxx:v:18:y:2019:i:03:n:s0219649219500308. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tai Tone Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.worldscinet.com/jikm/jikm.shtml .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.