IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/transj/v51y2012i4p399-427.html

An Exploration of the Relational Effects of Supply Chain Disruptions

Author

Listed:
  • Tobin E. Porterfield
  • John R. Macdonald
  • Stanley E. Griffis

Abstract

Recent catastrophic events have disrupted supply chains around the globe, causing practitioners and academics to look more closely at recovery strategies. Recent examinations of supply chain disruptions focus primarily upon the recovery process and its impacts on firm performance. However, less is known about how supply chain disruptions affect business‐to‐business (B2B) relationships. This study uses interview data from senior supply chain managers to explore how a firm's disruption recovery processes affect supply chain relationships. Results suggest that firms desire supply chain partner participation in the recovery process and value interpersonal characteristics, including honesty, accessibility, and responsiveness.

Suggested Citation

  • Tobin E. Porterfield & John R. Macdonald & Stanley E. Griffis, 2012. "An Exploration of the Relational Effects of Supply Chain Disruptions," Transportation Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 51(4), pages 399-427, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:transj:v:51:y:2012:i:4:p:399-427
    DOI: 10.5325/transportationj.51.4.0399
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.5325/transportationj.51.4.0399
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5325/transportationj.51.4.0399?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tobin E. Porterfield, 2008. "Diversity in Business‐to‐Business Information Exchange: An Empirical Analysis of Manufacturers and their Trading Partners," Transportation Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 47(3), pages 36-47, June.
    2. Brian Tomlin, 2006. "On the Value of Mitigation and Contingency Strategies for Managing Supply Chain Disruption Risks," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(5), pages 639-657, May.
    3. Hau L. Lee & V. Padmanabhan & Seungjin Whang, 1997. "Information Distortion in a Supply Chain: The Bullwhip Effect," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(4), pages 546-558, April.
    4. Yossi Sheffi, 2005. "The Resilient Enterprise: Overcoming Vulnerability for Competitive Advantage," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262693496, December.
    5. Wilson, Martha C., 2007. "The impact of transportation disruptions on supply chain performance," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 43(4), pages 295-320, July.
    6. Maxham, James III, 2001. "Service recovery's influence on consumer satisfaction, positive word-of-mouth, and purchase intentions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 54(1), pages 11-24, October.
    7. Kassarjian, Harold H, 1977. "Content Analysis in Consumer Research," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 4(1), pages 8-18, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rana Azghandi & Jacqueline Griffin & Mohammad S. Jalali, 2018. "Minimization of Drug Shortages in Pharmaceutical Supply Chains: A Simulation-Based Analysis of Drug Recall Patterns and Inventory Policies," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-14, December.
    2. Ying Rong & Lawrence V. Snyder & Zuo‐Jun Max Shen, 2017. "Bullwhip and reverse bullwhip effects under the rationing game," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 64(3), pages 203-216, April.
    3. A. V. Thomas & Biswajit Mahanty, 2021. "Dynamic assessment of control system designs of information shared supply chain network experiencing supplier disruption," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 425-451, March.
    4. Revilla, Elena & Sáenz, María Jesús, 2014. "Supply chain disruption management: Global convergence vs national specificity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(6), pages 1123-1135.
    5. Xiang Li, 2017. "Optimal procurement strategies from suppliers with random yield and all-or-nothing risks," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 257(1), pages 167-181, October.
    6. Tang, Liang & Jing, Ke & He, Jie & Stanley, H. Eugene, 2016. "Robustness of assembly supply chain networks by considering risk propagation and cascading failure," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 459(C), pages 129-139.
    7. Yi Tao & Loo Hay Lee & Ek Peng Chew, 2016. "Quantifying the Effect of Sharing Information in a Supply Chain Facing Supply Disruptions," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 33(04), pages 1-28, August.
    8. Kevin B. Hendricks & Manpreet Hora & Vinod R. Singhal, 2015. "An Empirical Investigation on the Appointments of Supply Chain and Operations Management Executives," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 61(7), pages 1562-1583, July.
    9. Jayashankar M. Swaminathan, 2025. "OM Forum—Operations Management Research: Relevance and Impact," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 27(1), pages 1-7, January.
    10. Chowdhury, Md Maruf H. & Quaddus, Mohammed, 2017. "Supply chain resilience: Conceptualization and scale development using dynamic capability theory," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 185-204.
    11. Jingfu Huang & Gaoke Wu & Yiju Wang, 2021. "Retailer’s Emergency Ordering Policy When Facing an Impending Supply Disruption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-21, June.
    12. A. Thangam, 2017. "Retailer’s optimal replenishment policy in a two-echelon supply chain under two-part delay in payments and disruption in delivery," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 8(1), pages 26-46, January.
    13. Célestin Elock Son, 2018. "Supply Chain Risk Management: A Review of Thirteen Years of Research," Post-Print hal-03029453, HAL.
    14. Ke, Jian-yu & Cho, Woohyun & Su, Hao, 2025. "Flying through uncertainty: Air transportation’s impact on supply chain resilience and inventory efficiency," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    15. Hong, Seock-Jin & Savoie, Michael & Joiner, Steve & Kincaid, Timothy, 2022. "Analysis of airline employees’ perceptions of corporate preparedness for COVID-19 disruptions to airline operations," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 45-55.
    16. Scott DuHadway & Steven Carnovale & Benjamin Hazen, 2019. "Understanding risk management for intentional supply chain disruptions: risk detection, risk mitigation, and risk recovery," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 283(1), pages 179-198, December.
    17. Hishamuddin, Hawa & Sarker, Ruhul A. & Essam, Daryl, 2014. "A recovery mechanism for a two echelon supply chain system under supply disruption," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 555-563.
    18. Yanyan Yang & Shenle Pan & Eric Ballot, 2016. "Performance evaluation of interconnected logistics networks confronted to hub disruptions," Post-Print hal-01320641, HAL.
    19. David Simchi-Levi & William Schmidt & Yehua Wei & Peter Yun Zhang & Keith Combs & Yao Ge & Oleg Gusikhin & Michael Sanders & Don Zhang, 2015. "Identifying Risks and Mitigating Disruptions in the Automotive Supply Chain," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 45(5), pages 375-390, October.
    20. Yanyan Yang & Shenle Pan & Eric Ballot, 2017. "Mitigating supply chain disruptions through interconnected logistics services in the Physical Internet," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(14), pages 3970-3983, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:transj:v:51:y:2012:i:4:p:399-427. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.