IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/syseng/v13y2010i3p217-231.html

Lunar architecture and technology analysis driven by lunar science scenarios

Author

Listed:
  • Charles R. Weisbin
  • Joseph Mrozinski
  • William Lincoln
  • Alberto Elfes
  • Kacie Shelton
  • Hook Hua
  • Jeffrey H. Smith
  • Virgil Adumitroaie
  • Robert Silberg

Abstract

NASA's Vision for Space Exploration and the missions it comprises pose large‐scale systems‐engineering problems with concomitant large‐budget investment decisions involving multiple disciplines (e.g., science, engineering, information technology), multiple constraints (e.g., time, mass, energy consumption), myriad uncertainties, and a hierarchical structure of problem decomposition with resolution of increasing fidelity. Navigation through this sea of complexity is greatly facilitated by an analytical system that includes optimization and analysis software tools. The interplay between program planning and decision‐support tools is seen here in a case study of a hypothetical mission on the Moon. The architecture of one such tool, HURON, is discussed and its application is illustrated in a comparison of the relative productivity of employing two pressurized or two unpressurized robotic rovers with two pairs of astronauts to conduct a specified group of activities. For the mission scenarios studied, a pair of pressurized rovers is shown to be significantly more productive than a pair of unpressurized rovers when calculating work accomplished divided by marginal operational costs. The HURON decision‐support system presented and successfully applied in this paper deals explicitly with combinatorial explosion of a huge design space in scheduling the activities of agents subject to constraints, deploys a productivity function as a measure of value, and automatically determines a ranked sensitivity list of important inputs. The approach is applicable to a wide class of large‐scale systems‐engineering applications. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Syst Eng

Suggested Citation

  • Charles R. Weisbin & Joseph Mrozinski & William Lincoln & Alberto Elfes & Kacie Shelton & Hook Hua & Jeffrey H. Smith & Virgil Adumitroaie & Robert Silberg, 2010. "Lunar architecture and technology analysis driven by lunar science scenarios," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(3), pages 217-231, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:syseng:v:13:y:2010:i:3:p:217-231
    DOI: 10.1002/sys.20144
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.20144
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sys.20144?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David G. Luenberger & Yinyu Ye, 2008. "Linear and Nonlinear Programming," International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, Springer, edition 0, number 978-0-387-74503-9, May.
    2. Brucker, Peter & Drexl, Andreas & Mohring, Rolf & Neumann, Klaus & Pesch, Erwin, 1999. "Resource-constrained project scheduling: Notation, classification, models, and methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 112(1), pages 3-41, January.
    3. A. Elfes & C. R. Weisbin & R. Manvi & V. Adumitroaie & W. P. Lincoln & K. Shelton, 2006. "Extending the START framework: Computation of optimal capability development portfolios using a decision theory approach," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 9(4), pages 331-357, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Asbach, Lasse & Dorndorf, Ulrich & Pesch, Erwin, 2009. "Analysis, modeling and solution of the concrete delivery problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 193(3), pages 820-835, March.
    2. Andrzej Kozik, 2017. "Handling precedence constraints in scheduling problems by the sequence pair representation," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 33(2), pages 445-472, February.
    3. Xiong, Jian & Leus, Roel & Yang, Zhenyu & Abbass, Hussein A., 2016. "Evolutionary multi-objective resource allocation and scheduling in the Chinese navigation satellite system project," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 251(2), pages 662-675.
    4. Rolf H. Möhring & Andreas S. Schulz & Frederik Stork & Marc Uetz, 2003. "Solving Project Scheduling Problems by Minimum Cut Computations," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(3), pages 330-350, March.
    5. Ilkyeong Moon & Sanghyup Lee & Moonsoo Shin & Kwangyeol Ryu, 2016. "Evolutionary resource assignment for workload-based production scheduling," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 375-388, April.
    6. Oddvar Kloster & Carlo Mannino & Atle Riise & Patrick Schittekat, 2022. "Scheduling Vehicles with Spatial Conflicts," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 56(5), pages 1165-1178, September.
    7. Tanaka, Ken'ichiro & Toda, Alexis Akira, 2015. "Discretizing Distributions with Exact Moments: Error Estimate and Convergence Analysis," University of California at San Diego, Economics Working Paper Series qt7g23r5kh, Department of Economics, UC San Diego.
    8. Ashrafi, M. & Khanjani, M.J. & Fadaei-Kermani, E. & Barani, G.A., 2015. "Farm drainage channel network optimization by improved modified minimal spanning tree," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 1-8.
    9. Sergey Badikov & Antoine Jacquier & Daphne Qing Liu & Patrick Roome, 2016. "No-arbitrage bounds for the forward smile given marginals," Papers 1603.06389, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2016.
    10. Szidarovszky, Ferenc & Luo, Yi, 2014. "Incorporating risk seeking attitude into defense strategy," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 104-109.
    11. Dorndorf, Ulrich & Drexl, Andreas & Nikulin, Yury & Pesch, Erwin, 2005. "Flight gate scheduling: State-of-the-art and recent developments," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 584, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    12. Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre (Ed.), 2000. "Jahresbericht 1999," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 522, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    13. Drexl, Andreas & Nikulin, Yury, 2006. "Fuzzy multicriteria flight gate assignment," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 605, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    14. Rafał Wiśniowski & Krzysztof Skrzypaszek & Tomasz Małachowski, 2020. "Selection of a Suitable Rheological Model for Drilling Fluid Using Applied Numerical Methods," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-17, June.
    15. Dmitri Viattchenin, 2015. "Reducing the number of paths in a minimized project-network with given bounds on the durations of activities," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 25(4), pages 71-87.
    16. Yuichi Takano & Renata Sotirov, 2012. "A polynomial optimization approach to constant rebalanced portfolio selection," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 52(3), pages 645-666, July.
    17. Ferreira, Cristiane & Figueira, Gonçalo & Amorim, Pedro, 2021. "Scheduling Human-Robot Teams in collaborative working cells," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    18. Artigues, Christian & Michelon, Philippe & Reusser, Stephane, 2003. "Insertion techniques for static and dynamic resource-constrained project scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(2), pages 249-267, September.
    19. Nadia Demarteau & Thomas Breuer & Baudouin Standaert, 2012. "Selecting a Mix of Prevention Strategies against Cervical Cancer for Maximum Efficiency with an Optimization Program," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 30(4), pages 337-353, April.
    20. Iulian Mircea & Radu R. Şerban, 2010. "Heuristic And Optimum Solutions In Allocation Problems," Journal of Information Systems & Operations Management, Romanian-American University, vol. 4(2), pages 126-136, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:syseng:v:13:y:2010:i:3:p:217-231. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6858 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.