IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/sustdv/v34y2026is1p1144-1172.html

Evaluating the Quality of Corruption Surveys for Comparative Research and Sustainable Development

Author

Listed:
  • Giulia Mugellini
  • Rédina Berkachy
  • Jean‐Patrick Villeneuve

Abstract

Reliable and accurate corruption measurement is crucial for effective governance, evidence‐based policymaking, and the monitoring of global goals such as the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). While perception‐based corruption metrics are widely used, they face criticism due to conceptual ambiguities and vulnerability to societal biases. Experience‐based corruption surveys offer a promising alternative, yet their methodological quality remains underexplored. To address this issue, this study evaluates 58 national and cross‐national corruption surveys using a comprehensive framework based on six quality dimensions developed by the United Nations: relevance, accuracy, reliability, periodicity, accessibility, and comparability. Findings reveal that cross‐national surveys excel in comparability and reliability, whereas national surveys face challenges in accessibility and periodicity. Specialized surveys generally outperform non‐specialized ones. Regional disparities also emerge: European and Latin American surveys score highest in relevance and comparability, while Asian and African surveys struggle with accessibility and periodicity. By using this framework, academics and policy makers can promote input and output harmonization and thus enhance corruption survey methodologies and ensure better data reliability for anti‐corruption policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Giulia Mugellini & Rédina Berkachy & Jean‐Patrick Villeneuve, 2026. "Evaluating the Quality of Corruption Surveys for Comparative Research and Sustainable Development," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(S1), pages 1144-1172, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:34:y:2026:i:s1:p:1144-1172
    DOI: 10.1002/sd.70210
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.70210
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sd.70210?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Whitley, Edgar A. & Martinez, Tatiana, 2023. "Open data as an anticorruption tool? Using distributed cognition to understand breakdowns in the creation of transparency data," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 118578, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Kristyna Chabova, 2017. "Erratum to: Measuring corruption in Europe: public opinion surveys and composite indices," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 51(4), pages 1901-1901, July.
    3. José-Miguel Bello y Villarino, 2021. "Measuring Corruption: A Critical Analysis of the Existing Datasets and Their Suitability for Diachronic Transnational Research," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 157(2), pages 709-747, September.
    4. Heywood, Paul M. & Rose, Jonathan, 2014. "“Close but no Cigar”: the measurement of corruption," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 34(3), pages 507-529, December.
    5. Knack, Stephen, 2007. "Measuring Corruption: A Critique of Indicators in Eastern Europe and Central Asia," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 27(3), pages 255-291, December.
    6. Sally Engle Merry, 2019. "The Sustainable Development Goals Confront the Infrastructure of Measurement," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 10(S1), pages 146-148, January.
    7. Walter Leal Filho & Tony Wall & Amanda Lange Salvia & Pinar Ozuyar & Luciana Londero Brandli & Anabela Marisa Azul & Ayyoob Sharifi, 2025. "Mapping the Implementation of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(S1), pages 561-576, November.
    8. Kristyna Chabova, 2017. "Measuring corruption in Europe: public opinion surveys and composite indices," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 51(4), pages 1877-1900, July.
    9. Gutmann, Jerg & Padovano, Fabio & Voigt, Stefan, 2020. "Perception vs. experience: Explaining differences in corruption measures using microdata," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    10. Rédina Berkachy & Jean‐Patrick Villeneuve & Giulia Mugellini, 2025. "Monitoring the Risk of Corruption in the MENA Region: What Are the Most Reliable Data to Address the Sustainable Development Goals?," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(3), pages 4468-4491, June.
    11. Giulia Mugellini & Jean‐Patrick Villeneuve & Marlen Heide, 2021. "Monitoring sustainable development goals and the quest for high‐quality indicators: Learning from a practical evaluation of data on corruption," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(6), pages 1257-1275, November.
    12. Andrew Delios & Edmund J. Malesky & Shu Yu & Griffin Riddler, 2024. "Methodological errors in corruption research: Recommendations for future research," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 55(2), pages 235-251, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rédina Berkachy & Jean‐Patrick Villeneuve & Giulia Mugellini, 2025. "Monitoring the Risk of Corruption in the MENA Region: What Are the Most Reliable Data to Address the Sustainable Development Goals?," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(3), pages 4468-4491, June.
    2. Giulia Mugellini & Jean‐Patrick Villeneuve & Marlen Heide, 2021. "Monitoring sustainable development goals and the quest for high‐quality indicators: Learning from a practical evaluation of data on corruption," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(6), pages 1257-1275, November.
    3. José-Miguel Bello y Villarino, 2021. "Measuring Corruption: A Critical Analysis of the Existing Datasets and Their Suitability for Diachronic Transnational Research," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 157(2), pages 709-747, September.
    4. Demirgüç-Kunt, Asli & Lokshin, Michael & Kolchin, Vladimir, 2023. "Effects of public sector wages on corruption: Wage inequality matters," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(3), pages 941-959.
    5. Parvanova, Iva & Lagarde, Mylene, 2025. "Framing of sensitive topics in surveys measuring corruption in healthcare," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 364(C).
    6. Sheilendra Peerthum & Takesh Luckho, 2021. "Exploring the Linkage Between Public Corruption and Political Trust in Mauritius: a PLS-SEM Approach," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 317-335, June.
    7. Daniel Homocianu & Aurelian-Petruș Plopeanu & Rodica Ianole-Calin, 2021. "A Robust Approach for Identifying the Major Components of the Bribery Tolerance Index," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(13), pages 1-20, July.
    8. Graziella Bonanno & Lucia Errico & Nadia Fiorino & Roberto Ricciuti, 2025. "The impact of government size on corruption: A meta‐regression analysis," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(4), pages 1727-1757, September.
    9. Van Ha, Le, 2024. "Unveiling a novel approach to corruption measurement: Leveraging household survey data on income and expenditure through forensic analysis," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    10. Bonnie J. Palifka & Giovanna Rodriguez-Garcia & Rocio Garcia-Diaz, 2026. "“To Substantially Reduce Bribery and Corruption in all Their Forms”: A Multidimensional Index of Progress on Sustainable Development Goal 16.5," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 182(1), pages 1-27, March.
    11. Lili Pan & Lin Wang & Qianqian Feng, 2022. "Effects of Host-Country Corruption on China’s Outward Foreign Direct Investments: Expert Knowledge Versus Public Awareness," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(4), pages 21582440221, December.
    12. Ilona Wysmułek, 2019. "Using public opinion surveys to evaluate corruption in Europe: trends in the corruption items of 21 international survey projects, 1989–2017," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 53(5), pages 2589-2610, September.
    13. Yu Hao & Chun-Ping Chang & Zao Sun, 2018. "Erratum to: Women and corruption: evidence from multinational panel data," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(4), pages 1469-1469, July.
    14. Joseph Pozsgai-Alvarez, 2025. "Three-Dimensional Corruption Metrics: A Proposal for Integrating Frequency, Cost, and Significance," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 178(1), pages 39-62, May.
    15. Fernando Castelló-Sirvent & Pablo Pinazo-Dallenbach, 2021. "Corruption Shock in Mexico: fsQCA Analysis of Entrepreneurial Intention in University Students," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(14), pages 1-31, July.
    16. Andrea Sáenz de Viteri Vázquez & Christian Bjørnskov, 2020. "Constitutional power concentration and corruption: evidence from Latin America and the Caribbean," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 31(4), pages 509-536, December.
    17. Jerg Gutmann & Katarzyna Metelska-Szaniawska & Stefan Voigt, 2024. "The comparative constitutional compliance database," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 95-115, January.
    18. Philip Keefer & Christopher Kilby, 2021. "Introduction to the special issue: In memoriam Stephen Knack," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 473-493, July.
    19. Jerg Gutmann & Pascal Langer & Matthias Neuenkirch, 2025. "International Sanctions and Corruption," Research Papers in Economics 2025-06, University of Trier, Department of Economics.
    20. Garoupa, Nuno & Spruk, Rok, 2025. "Populist constitutional backsliding and judicial independence: Evidence from Türkiye," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:34:y:2026:i:s1:p:1144-1172. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1719 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.