IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/sustdv/v34y2026i1p112-130.html

Barriers to Greening the Indian MSMEs Sector: A Path Toward Sustainable Industrial Transformation

Author

Listed:
  • Shivansh Nautiyal
  • Sushil Kumar Rai
  • Shivam Joshi

Abstract

This study identifies and ranks barriers that prevent India's Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) from adopting green and sustainable industrial transformation—an essential step for achieving the country's environmental goals. Most of the existing studies examine the promotion of MSME growth along with environmental sustainability, but often in a limited and fragmented way. The lack of comprehensive analysis of the diverse barriers is more evident in the context of the Indian MSMEs, especially related to regulatory challenges. This study seeks to address this gap by conducting a systematic literature review (SLR) to extract a comprehensive list of barriers spanning from 2001 to 2024. Subsequently, Fuzzy AHP was applied to rank and prioritize these barriers. Finally, a sensitivity analysis was used to ensure the reliability of the fuzzy system. Since most Indian MSMEs operate informally, this paper adopted a more structured classification of government policy and regulations to comprehend the complexities of regulatory constraints encountered by Indian MSMEs. The results indicate that among the four identified categories, organizational barriers were the most significant, followed by government policy and regulations barriers, technological barriers, and financial barriers. The findings of the sensitivity analysis revealed the interactions among the identified barriers and advocate the importance of handling these challenges in a coordinated manner. Further, the study found that the non‐mandatory nature of eco‐friendly measures allows Indian MSMEs to prioritize profit over environmental sustainability, contradicting the common perception that they neglect environmental responsibilities merely to sustain their operations. For effective policymaking, the study emphasizes the need for both a unified approach to eliminating existing barriers and the implementation of robust regulatory measures to promote green and sustainable transformation in India's MSME sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Shivansh Nautiyal & Sushil Kumar Rai & Shivam Joshi, 2026. "Barriers to Greening the Indian MSMEs Sector: A Path Toward Sustainable Industrial Transformation," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(1), pages 112-130, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:34:y:2026:i:1:p:112-130
    DOI: 10.1002/sd.70255
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.70255
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sd.70255?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Saaty, Thomas L., 1990. "How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 9-26, September.
    2. Wagner Cezar Lucato & José Carlos da Silva Santos & Athos Paulo Tadeu Pacchini, 2017. "Measuring the Sustainability of a Manufacturing Process: A Conceptual Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-12, December.
    3. David Murillo & Josep Lozano, 2006. "SMEs and CSR: An Approach to CSR in their Own Words," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 67(3), pages 227-240, September.
    4. Hongmei Shan & Ying Li & Jing Shi, 2020. "Influence of Supply Chain Collaborative Innovation on Sustainable Development of Supply Chain: A Study on Chinese Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-19, April.
    5. Mehdi Abid & Habib Sekrafi & Zouheyr Gheraia & Hanane Abdelli, 2024. "Regulating the unobservable: The impact of the environmental regulation on informal economy and pollution," Energy & Environment, , vol. 35(7), pages 3463-3482, November.
    6. Milena Angelova, 2023. "Factors for Boosting the Green Transition of the European Micro, Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 2, pages 59-77.
    7. Junia A. Purwandani & Gilbert Michaud, 2021. "What are the drivers and barriers for green business practice adoption for SMEs?," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 41(4), pages 577-593, December.
    8. Nazneen Durrani & Abdul Raziq & Tarique Mahmood & Mustafa Rehman Khan, 2024. "Barriers to adaptation of environmental sustainability in SMEs: A qualitative study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(5), pages 1-22, May.
    9. Bina, Olivia & La Camera, Francesco, 2011. "Promise and shortcomings of a green turn in recent policy responses to the “double crisis”," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(12), pages 2308-2316.
    10. Chang, Da-Yong, 1996. "Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 95(3), pages 649-655, December.
    11. Ying Luo & Xiaowen Jie & Xiaoping Li & Liming Yao, 2018. "Ranking Chinese SMEs Green Manufacturing Drivers Using a Novel Hybrid Multi-Criterion Decision-Making Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-23, July.
    12. Shah Fahad & Faisal Alnori & Fang Su & Jian Deng, 2022. "Adoption of green innovation practices in SMEs sector: evidence from an emerging economy," Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(1), pages 5486-5501, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hazem Ali & Ting Chen & Yunhong Hao, 2021. "Sustainable Manufacturing Practices, Competitive Capabilities, and Sustainable Performance: Moderating Role of Environmental Regulations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-19, September.
    2. Choudhary, Devendra & Shankar, Ravi, 2012. "An STEEP-fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS framework for evaluation and selection of thermal power plant location: A case study from India," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 510-521.
    3. Ezgi Güler & Süheyla Yerel Kandemir, 2024. "Analysis of PM 10 Substances via Intuitionistic Fuzzy Decision-Making and Statistical Evaluation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-23, September.
    4. Caprioli, Caterina & Bottero, Marta, 2021. "Addressing complex challenges in transformations and planning: A fuzzy spatial multicriteria analysis for identifying suitable locations for urban infrastructures," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    5. Wendong Jiang, 2024. "Key Selection Factors Influencing Animation Films from the Perspective of the Audience," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-21, May.
    6. Daniel Jugend & Hugo Henrique dos Santos & Susana Garrido & Regiane Máximo Siqueira & Jaime A. Mesa, 2024. "Circular product design challenges: An exploratory study on critical barriers," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(5), pages 4825-4842, July.
    7. Murad Samhouri & Majdoleen Abualeenein & Farah Al-Atrash, 2025. "Enhancing Supply Chain Resilience Through a Fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS to Mitigate Transportation Disruption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-31, August.
    8. Klaus D. Goepel, 2019. "Comparison of Judgment Scales of the Analytical Hierarchy Process — A New Approach," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(02), pages 445-463, March.
    9. Abdulrahman AlKassem & Kamal Al-Haddad & Dragan Komljenovic & Andrea Schiffauerova, 2025. "The Strategic Selection of Concentrated Solar Thermal Power Technologies in Developing Countries Using a Fuzzy Decision Framework," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-25, April.
    10. Kaixuan Liu & Jiayu Zhao & Chun Zhu, 2022. "Research on Digital Restoration of Plain Unlined Silk Gauze Gown of Mawangdui Han Dynasty Tomb Based on AHP and Human–Computer Interaction Technology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-19, July.
    11. Kaya, İhsan, 2012. "Evaluation of outsourcing alternatives under fuzzy environment for waste management," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 107-118.
    12. Mukund Pratap Singh & Pitam Singh & Priyamvada Singh, 2019. "Fuzzy AHP-based multi-criteria decision-making analysis for route alignment planning using geographic information system (GIS)," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 395-432, September.
    13. Jahanifar, Komeil & Amirnejad, Hamid & Azadi, Hossein & Adenle, Ademola A. & Scheffran, Jürgen, 2019. "Economic analysis of land use changes in forests and rangelands: Developing conservation strategies," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    14. Junxi Zhu & Chia-Liang Lin, 2024. "Research on Service Quality for China’s Ceramic Product Design Industry," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-27, September.
    15. Subburaj Alagarsamy & Sunitha Prabhuram & Rajani Ramadas, 2025. "Assessing the Mediating Role of Planned Behavior and Moderating Effects of Ethical Ideology in Immigrant Family‐Owned SMES Sustainability Intentions," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(6), pages 7920-7937, November.
    16. D. Bajić & D. Polomčić & J. Ratković, 2017. "Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for the Purposes of Groundwater Control System Design," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 31(15), pages 4759-4784, December.
    17. Miodrag Čelebić & Dragoljub Bajić & Sanja Bajić & Mirjana Banković & Duško Torbica & Aleksej Milošević & Dejan Stevanović, 2024. "Development of an Integrated Model for Open-Pit-Mine Discontinuous Haulage System Optimization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-16, April.
    18. Panagiotis K. Marhavilas & Michael G. Tegas & Georgios K. Koulinas & Dimitrios E. Koulouriotis, 2020. "A Joint Stochastic/Deterministic Process with Multi-Objective Decision Making Risk-Assessment Framework for Sustainable Constructions Engineering Projects—A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-21, May.
    19. Vecihi Yiğit & Nazlı Nisa Demir & Hisham Alidrisi & Mehmet Emin Aydin, 2020. "Elicitation of the Factors Affecting Electricity Distribution Efficiency Using the Fuzzy AHP Method," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-25, December.
    20. Shang, Delei & Yin, Guangzhi & Li, Xiaoshuang & Li, Yaoji & Jiang, Changbao & Kang, Xiangtao & Liu, Chao & Zhang, Chi, 2015. "Analysis for Green Mine (phosphate) performance of China: An evaluation index system," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(P2), pages 71-84.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:34:y:2026:i:1:p:112-130. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1719 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.