IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i16p7375-d1724924.html

Enhancing Supply Chain Resilience Through a Fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS to Mitigate Transportation Disruption

Author

Listed:
  • Murad Samhouri

    (Industrial Engineering Department, German Jordanian University, Amman Madaba Street, Amman 11180, Jordan)

  • Majdoleen Abualeenein

    (Industrial Engineering Department, German Jordanian University, Amman Madaba Street, Amman 11180, Jordan)

  • Farah Al-Atrash

    (Architecture & Interior Architecture Department, Jabal Amman Campus, German Jordanian University (GJU), Amman 11180, Jordan)

Abstract

Supply chain resilience is a growing concern as risk becomes increasingly challenging to interpret and anticipate due to sudden global events that disrupt the core of global supply chains. This paper discusses the use of advanced technologies to enhance supply chain resilience, proposing a two-step hybrid fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) and the technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) approach that evaluates a set of different supply chain KPIs or criteria that trigger possible supply chain risks, with a focus on transportation disruptions. Using FAHP, the highest potential risks from disasters are identified, and TOPSIS is used to rank alternative solutions that enhance supply chain resilience. The approach is tested on real-world applications across multiple supply chain systems involving various companies and experts to demonstrate its validity, feasibility, and applicability. Based on five criteria and six alternatives per case study, the findings showed that for manufacturing supply chains, the highest risk was attributed to travel time (46%), and the most effective solution to mitigate it was found to be strengthening highway networks (0.72). For transportation, delivery time (56%) was the primary risk, addressed by green logistics and sustainability (0.89).

Suggested Citation

  • Murad Samhouri & Majdoleen Abualeenein & Farah Al-Atrash, 2025. "Enhancing Supply Chain Resilience Through a Fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS to Mitigate Transportation Disruption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-31, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:16:p:7375-:d:1724924
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/16/7375/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/16/7375/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sanjoy Kumar Paul & Sobhan Asian & Mark Goh & S. Ali Torabi, 2019. "Managing sudden transportation disruptions in supply chains under delivery delay and quantity loss," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 273(1), pages 783-814, February.
    2. Katarzyna Grzybowska & Agnieszka Stachowiak, 2022. "Global Changes and Disruptions in Supply Chains—Preliminary Research to Sustainable Resilience of Supply Chains," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-15, June.
    3. Saaty, Thomas L., 1990. "How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 9-26, September.
    4. Dmitry Ivanov & Alexandre Dolgui & Boris Sokolov & Marina Ivanova, 2017. "Literature review on disruption recovery in the supply chain," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(20), pages 6158-6174, October.
    5. Chang, Da-Yong, 1996. "Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 95(3), pages 649-655, December.
    6. K. Katsaliaki & P. Galetsi & S. Kumar, 2022. "Supply chain disruptions and resilience: a major review and future research agenda," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 319(1), pages 965-1002, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marjan Sternad & Borut Jereb & Uro Kramar, 2026. "Prioritising Supply Chain Disruptions Using a Triangulated Multi-Criteria Approach," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 28(71), pages 219-219, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Choudhary, Devendra & Shankar, Ravi, 2012. "An STEEP-fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS framework for evaluation and selection of thermal power plant location: A case study from India," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 510-521.
    2. López, C. & Morales-Contreras, M.F. & Langella, I.M. & Alonso-Monge, J., 2025. "Modeling supply chain disruptions due to geopolitical Reasons: A systematic literature review," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    3. Maureen S. Golan & Laura H. Jernegan & Igor Linkov, 2020. "Trends and applications of resilience analytics in supply chain modeling: systematic literature review in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 40(2), pages 222-243, June.
    4. Francesco Cafforio & SangWoo Park & Ilaria Giannoccaro & Layek Abdel‐Malek, 2025. "Resilience of Circular Supply Chains: Analyzing the Impact of Take‐Back Strategies via Efficient Computation of Post‐Disturbance Equilibrium," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(6), pages 8721-8736, December.
    5. Junxi Zhu & Chia-Liang Lin, 2024. "Research on Service Quality for China’s Ceramic Product Design Industry," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-27, September.
    6. Miodrag Čelebić & Dragoljub Bajić & Sanja Bajić & Mirjana Banković & Duško Torbica & Aleksej Milošević & Dejan Stevanović, 2024. "Development of an Integrated Model for Open-Pit-Mine Discontinuous Haulage System Optimization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-16, April.
    7. Panagiotis K. Marhavilas & Michael G. Tegas & Georgios K. Koulinas & Dimitrios E. Koulouriotis, 2020. "A Joint Stochastic/Deterministic Process with Multi-Objective Decision Making Risk-Assessment Framework for Sustainable Constructions Engineering Projects—A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-21, May.
    8. Shang, Delei & Yin, Guangzhi & Li, Xiaoshuang & Li, Yaoji & Jiang, Changbao & Kang, Xiangtao & Liu, Chao & Zhang, Chi, 2015. "Analysis for Green Mine (phosphate) performance of China: An evaluation index system," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(P2), pages 71-84.
    9. PrasannaVenkatesan, S. & Goh, M., 2016. "Multi-objective supplier selection and order allocation under disruption risk," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 124-142.
    10. Vicente Rodríguez Montequín & Joaquín Manuel Villanueva Balsera & Marina Díaz Piloñeta & César Álvarez Pérez, 2020. "A Bradley-Terry Model-Based Approach to Prioritize the Balance Scorecard Driving Factors: The Case Study of a Financial Software Factory," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-15, February.
    11. Badreya Gharib Khamis Mohammed Alblooshi & Syed Zamberi Ahmad & Matloub Hussain & Sanjay Kumar Singh, 2022. "Sustainable management of electronic waste: Empirical evidences from a stakeholders' perspective," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 1856-1874, May.
    12. Muhammad Mohsin & Yin Hengbin & Zhang Luyao & Li Rui & Qian Chong & Ana Mehak, 2022. "An Application of Multiple-Criteria Decision Analysis for Risk Prioritization and Management: A Case Study of the Fisheries Sector in Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-21, July.
    13. Nyimbili, Penjani Hopkins & Erden, Turan, 2020. "GIS-based fuzzy multi-criteria approach for optimal site selection of fire stations in Istanbul, Turkey," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    14. Yiqing Sun & Zhenzhong Shen & Weihua Fang & Jiaao Yu & Lei Gan & Liqun Xu & Runying Wang & Hongwei Zhang & Ruiwen Liu & Congcong Zhou & Zhangxin Huang, 2024. "Evaluation of ecologically clean small watersheds in the Yangtze river estuary area of China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(10), pages 26147-26170, October.
    15. Dibyandu Roy & Anirban Dhar & Venkappayya R. Desai, 2024. "A grey fuzzy analytic hierarchy process-based flash flood vulnerability assessment in an ungauged Himalayan watershed," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(7), pages 18181-18206, July.
    16. Fang-Shii Ning & Kuang-Chang Pien & Wei-Jie Liou & Tsung-Chi Cheng, 2024. "Site Selection for Offshore Wind Power Farms with Natural Disaster Risk Assessment: A Case Study of the Waters off Taiwan’s West Coast," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-24, June.
    17. Chiung-Wen Hsu, 2014. "Key Factors and Recommendations for Adopting Renewable Energy Systems by Families and Firms," International Journal of Business and Economics, School of Management Development, Feng Chia University, Taichung, Taiwan, vol. 13(1), pages 39-58, June.
    18. Wanqiu Zhu & Jian Lu & Yunxuan Li & Yi Yang, 2019. "A Pick-Up Points Recommendation System for Ridesourcing Service," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-19, February.
    19. Sanjoy Kumar Paul & Priyabrata Chowdhury, 2020. "Strategies for Managing the Impacts of Disruptions During COVID-19: an Example of Toilet Paper," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 21(3), pages 283-293, September.
    20. Song, Yongze & Thatcher, Dominique & Li, Qindong & McHugh, Tom & Wu, Peng, 2021. "Developing sustainable road infrastructure performance indicators using a model-driven fuzzy spatial multi-criteria decision making method," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:16:p:7375-:d:1724924. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.