IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/sustdv/v33y2025is1p108-129.html

Evaluating Sustainable Development Goal 15 Across Various Scenarios Using an Integrated Multi‐Objective Programming and Patch‐Generating Land Use Simulation Framework in the Internationally Significant Wetland of Momoge

Author

Listed:
  • Jiaqi Han
  • Dongyan Wang
  • Andreas Rienow

Abstract

To support sustainable wetland management, this study simulated fine‐scale wetland patterns under four development scenarios for 2035, providing inputs for assessing ecological sustainability in the Momoge Nature Reserve, China. Specifically, future wetland patterns were modeled by an integrated multi‐objective programming and patch‐generating land use simulation framework. The resulting patterns were applied to calculate four Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 15 indicators: 15.1.2, 15.3.1, 15.5.1, and 15.9. These were further integrated into a composite wetland ecological sustainability index. The results show that (1) the simulation framework has high accuracy in simulating land use in wetland protected areas. (2) The wetland area reached the highest under the wetland protection scenario, approaching the pristine wetland pattern in 1965, while under the natural increase scenario, it decreased the most by 10.5% due to urban and agricultural expansion. (3) SDGs 15.1.2, 15.5.1, and 15.9 performed the best under the wetland protection scenario and the worst under the natural increase scenario. SDG 15.3.1 improved in all scenarios but failed to meet the target for land degradation neutrality. It reached the lowest value of 5.64% under the harmonious development scenario, while the highest value of 13.86% occurred under the wetland protection scenario due to water body expansion. (4) By 2035, none of the scenarios achieved a high level of wetland ecological sustainability. The wetland protection scenario was assessed as moderate, while all others were classified as low. Localized SDG 15 indicators effectively revealed differences in sustainability outcomes across scenarios and provided insights for targeted wetland protection and management.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiaqi Han & Dongyan Wang & Andreas Rienow, 2025. "Evaluating Sustainable Development Goal 15 Across Various Scenarios Using an Integrated Multi‐Objective Programming and Patch‐Generating Land Use Simulation Framework in the Internationally Significant Wetland of Momoge," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(S1), pages 108-129, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:33:y:2025:i:s1:p:108-129
    DOI: 10.1002/sd.3548
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3548
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sd.3548?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:33:y:2025:i:s1:p:108-129. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1719 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.