IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/sustdv/v33y2025i6p8190-8202.html

Impact of Industry 5.0 Technologies and Circular Economy on Sustainable Performance: An Evaluation From Stakeholder Theory Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Juan Guo
  • Long Guo
  • Abdul Waheed
  • Yang Jianhua

Abstract

Industry 5.0 enhances sustainable development by integrating human creativity with advanced technologies, promoting personalized and resilient production. It emphasizes social value and environmental responsibility, whereas circular economy and disaster prevention management are vital for bringing sustainable development. This study explores the connection between the Industry 5.0 (I5.0) model and sustainable performance (SP) by adopting three aspects of sustainability, such as social, economic, and environmental performance, within the Chinese market based on stakeholder theory. Another key objective is to explore the moderating influence of disaster prevention practices (DPP) and circular economy (CE) between the connection of I5.0 and SP, respectively. This study confirmed a positive association between the I5.0 model of technologies and SP by showing the significant role of circular economy and disaster prevention management. This study provides insights into I5.0, which could productively achieve sustainable performance, such as social, economic, and environmental performance. In this scenario, managing the circular economy and DPP can additionally augment the relationships of I5.0 toward sustainable performance. On the other hand, this study reports multiple implications, that is, theoretical and managerial applications, along with certain limitations and future directions.

Suggested Citation

  • Juan Guo & Long Guo & Abdul Waheed & Yang Jianhua, 2025. "Impact of Industry 5.0 Technologies and Circular Economy on Sustainable Performance: An Evaluation From Stakeholder Theory Perspective," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(6), pages 8190-8202, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:33:y:2025:i:6:p:8190-8202
    DOI: 10.1002/sd.70087
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.70087
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sd.70087?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Milton Harris & Artur Raviv, 2010. "Control of Corporate Decisions: Shareholders vs. Management," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 23(11), pages 4115-4147, November.
    2. Abdul Waheed & Qingyu Zhang & Yasir Rashid & Muhammad Sohail Tahir & Muhammad Wasif Zafar, 2020. "Impact of green manufacturing on consumer ecological behavior: Stakeholder engagement through green production and innovation," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(5), pages 1395-1403, September.
    3. Murat Kucukvar & Khalel Ahmed Alawi & Galal M. Abdella & Muhammet Enis Bulak & Nuri C. Onat & Melih Bulu & Murat Yalçıntaş, 2021. "A frontier‐based managerial approach for relative sustainability performance assessment of the world's airports," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(1), pages 89-107, January.
    4. Muhammad Wasif Zafar & Asif Saeed & Syed Anees Haider Zaidi & Abdul Waheed, 2021. "The linkages among natural resources, renewable energy consumption, and environmental quality: A path toward sustainable development," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(2), pages 353-362, March.
    5. repec:agr:journl:v:9(586):y:2013:i:9(586):p:7-26 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. González, Andrés & Teräsvirta, Timo & van Dijk, Dick & Yang, Yukai, 2005. "Panel Smooth Transition Regression Models," SSE/EFI Working Paper Series in Economics and Finance 604, Stockholm School of Economics, revised 11 Oct 2017.
    7. Rongying Zhao & Mingkun Wei, 2017. "Academic impact evaluation of Wechat in view of social media perspective," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 112(3), pages 1777-1791, September.
    8. Leeflang, Peter S.H. & Verhoef, Peter C. & Dahlström, Peter & Freundt, Tjark, 2014. "Challenges and solutions for marketing in a digital era," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 1-12.
    9. Giovana Sordi Schiavi & Ariel Behr, 2018. "Emerging technologies and new business models: a review on disruptive business models," Innovation & Management Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 15(4), pages 338-355, October.
    10. Victor DANCIU, 2013. "The sustainable company: new challenges and strategies for more sustainability," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania / Editura Economica, vol. 0(9(586)), pages 7-26, September.
    11. Vincenzo Varriale & Mark Anthony Camilleri & Antonello Cammarano & Francesca Michelino & Julian Müller & Serena Strazzullo, 2025. "Unleashing digital transformation to achieve the sustainable development goals across multiple sectors," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(1), pages 565-579, February.
    12. Jiao, Yawen, 2010. "Stakeholder welfare and firm value," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 34(10), pages 2549-2561, October.
    13. Djerdj Horvat & Angela Jäger & Christian M. Lerch, 2025. "Fostering innovation by complementing human competences and emerging technologies: an industry 5.0 perspective," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 63(3), pages 1126-1149, February.
    14. Flavio Tonelli & Steve Evans & Paolo Taticchi, 2013. "Industrial sustainability: challenges, perspectives, actions," International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(2), pages 143-163.
    15. Yosef Jabareen, 2008. "A New Conceptual Framework for Sustainable Development," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 10(2), pages 179-192, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiaozhong Shi, 2025. "A Novel Approach to Achieve Sustainable Development: Analysis of Industry 4.0 Framework, State‐of‐the‐Art Technologies, and Sustainability Dimensions Based on Stakeholder Theory and Practices," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(4), pages 4896-4908, August.
    2. Nicos A. Scordis & Yoshihiko Suzawa & Astrid Zwick & Lucia Ruckner, 2014. "Principles for Sustainable Insurance: Risk Management and Value," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 17(2), pages 265-276, September.
    3. Long Guo & Dongsheng Sun & Muhammad Akib Warraich & Abdul Waheed, 2023. "Does industry 5.0 model optimize sustainable performance of Agri‐enterprises? Real‐time investigation from the realm of stakeholder theory and domain," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(4), pages 2507-2516, August.
    4. Yuchi Zhang, 2024. "A path to sustainable development of agri‐industries: Analysis of agriculture 5.0 versus industry 5.0 using stakeholder theory with moderation of environmental policy," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(5), pages 4829-4843, October.
    5. Keyu Shang, 2026. "Balancing Corporate Social Responsibility, Environmental Policies, and Stakeholder Expectations for Sustainable Development: A Stakeholder‐Centric Analysis," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(S1), pages 1491-1500, January.
    6. Abdul Waheed & Muhammad Shahid Khan & Muhammad Akib Warraich & Mehwish Asghar Ali, 2024. "Environmental policy vs. Environmental innovation: An examination of policies disclosure on sustainable development from stakeholder theory perspective," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(3), pages 2506-2516, June.
    7. Yindan Zhang & Yuanyuan Li, 2023. "Society 5.0 versus Industry 5.0: An examination of industrialization models in driving sustainable development from a normative stakeholder theory perspective," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(5), pages 3786-3795, October.
    8. Ben Lahouel, Béchir & Ben Zaied, Younes & Managi, Shunsuke & Taleb, Lotfi, 2022. "Re-thinking about U: The relevance of regime-switching model in the relationship between environmental corporate social responsibility and financial performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 498-519.
    9. Marco Ghitti & Gianfranco Gianfrate & Lorenza Palma, 2024. "The agency of greenwashing," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 28(3), pages 905-941, September.
    10. Yi Yu, 2024. "Cultivating sustainable development in corporate internal matters: Nexus among high‐performance work systems, creativity, and impersonal trust from normative stakeholder theory," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(6), pages 7356-7366, December.
    11. Abdul Waheed & Majed Alharthi & Sher Zaman Khan & Muhammad Usman, 2022. "Role of Industry 5.0 in leveraging the Business Performance: Investigating Impact of Shared-Economy on Firms’ Performance with Intervening Role of i5.0 Technologies," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, April.
    12. Muhammad Kamran & Muhammad Zahid Rafique & Abdul Majeed Nadeem & Sofia Anwar, 2023. "Does Inclusive Growth Contribute Towards Sustainable Development? Evidence from Selected Developing Countries," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 165(2), pages 409-429, January.
    13. Xiaohui Du & Zhiyong Li & Long Bai & Lifang Pan, 2024. "Navigating sustainable development: Empirical analysis of corporate social responsibility, eco‐friendly production, and stakeholder green commitment through the lens of stakeholder theory," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(4), pages 4250-4260, August.
    14. Erik Xavier Wood, 2025. "The intersection of climate migration and urban emergency planning: policy gaps and future directions," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 121(14), pages 16765-16778, August.
    15. Coudert, Virginie & Couharde, Cécile & Mignon, Valérie, 2015. "On the impact of volatility on the real exchange rate – terms of trade nexus: Revisiting commodity currencies," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 110-127.
    16. Po-Chin Wu & Chung-Chih Lee, 2018. "The non-linear impact of monetary policy on international reserves: macroeconomic variables nexus," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 45(1), pages 165-185, February.
    17. Ylinen, Mika & Ranta, Mikko, 2025. "Predicting corporate innovation using machine learning and social media data," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    18. Dominik M. Wielgos & Christian Homburg & Christina Kuehnl, 2021. "Digital business capability: its impact on firm and customer performance," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 49(4), pages 762-789, July.
    19. Hervé Corvellec & Johan Hultman & Anne Jerneck & Susanne Arvidsson & Johan Ekroos & Niklas Wahlberg & Timothy W. Luke, 2021. "Resourcification: A non‐essentialist theory of resources for sustainable development," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(6), pages 1249-1256, November.
    20. Wu, Po-Chin & Liu, Shiao-Yen & Pan, Sheng-Chieh, 2013. "Nonlinear bilateral trade balance-fundamentals nexus: A panel smooth transition regression approach," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 318-329.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:33:y:2025:i:6:p:8190-8202. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1719 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.