IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/riskan/v36y2016i6p1211-1223.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Bayesian Semiparametric Model for Radiation Dose‐Response Estimation

Author

Listed:
  • Kyoji Furukawa
  • Munechika Misumi
  • John B. Cologne
  • Harry M. Cullings

Abstract

In evaluating the risk of exposure to health hazards, characterizing the dose‐response relationship and estimating acceptable exposure levels are the primary goals. In analyses of health risks associated with exposure to ionizing radiation, while there is a clear agreement that moderate to high radiation doses cause harmful effects in humans, little has been known about the possible biological effects at low doses, for example, below 0.1 Gy, which is the dose range relevant to most radiation exposures of concern today. A conventional approach to radiation dose‐response estimation based on simple parametric forms, such as the linear nonthreshold model, can be misleading in evaluating the risk and, in particular, its uncertainty at low doses. As an alternative approach, we consider a Bayesian semiparametric model that has a connected piece‐wise‐linear dose‐response function with prior distributions having an autoregressive structure among the random slope coefficients defined over closely spaced dose categories. With a simulation study and application to analysis of cancer incidence data among Japanese atomic bomb survivors, we show that this approach can produce smooth and flexible dose‐response estimation while reasonably handling the risk uncertainty at low doses and elsewhere. With relatively few assumptions and modeling options to be made by the analyst, the method can be particularly useful in assessing risks associated with low‐dose radiation exposures.

Suggested Citation

  • Kyoji Furukawa & Munechika Misumi & John B. Cologne & Harry M. Cullings, 2016. "A Bayesian Semiparametric Model for Radiation Dose‐Response Estimation," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(6), pages 1211-1223, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:36:y:2016:i:6:p:1211-1223
    DOI: 10.1111/risa.12513
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12513
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/risa.12513?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michela Bia & Carlos A. Flores & Alfonso Flores-Lagunes & Alessandra Mattei, 2014. "A Stata package for the application of semiparametric estimators of dose–response functions," Stata Journal, StataCorp LLC, vol. 14(3), pages 580-604, September.
    2. Brian Neelon & David B. Dunson, 2004. "Bayesian Isotonic Regression and Trend Analysis," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 60(2), pages 398-406, June.
    3. Isabelle Bray, 2002. "Application of Markov chain Monte Carlo methods to projecting cancer incidence and mortality," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 51(2), pages 151-164, May.
    4. Kyoji Furukawa & John B. Cologne & Yukiko Shimizu & N. Phillip Ross, 2009. "Predicting Future Excess Events in Risk Assessment," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(6), pages 885-899, June.
    5. Govindarajulu Usha S & Malloy Elizabeth J & Ganguli Bhaswati & Spiegelman Donna & Eisen Ellen A, 2009. "The Comparison of Alternative Smoothing Methods for Fitting Non-Linear Exposure-Response Relationships with Cox Models in a Simulation Study," The International Journal of Biostatistics, De Gruyter, vol. 5(1), pages 1-21, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ida D'Attoma & Silvia Pacei, 2018. "Evaluating the Effects of Product Innovation on the Performance of European Firms by Using the Generalised Propensity Score," German Economic Review, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 19(1), pages 94-112, February.
    2. Steckenleiter, Carina & Lechner, Michael & Pawlowski, Tim & Schüttoff, Ute, 2019. "Do local public expenditures on sports facilities affect sports participation in Germany?," Economics Working Paper Series 1905, University of St. Gallen, School of Economics and Political Science.
    3. A. Giffin & B. J. Reich & S. Yang & A. G. Rappold, 2023. "Generalized propensity score approach to causal inference with spatial interference," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(3), pages 2220-2231, September.
    4. Katrien Antonio & Anastasios Bardoutsos & Wilbert Ouburg, 2015. "Bayesian Poisson log-bilinear models for mortality projections with multiple populations," BAFFI CAREFIN Working Papers 1505, BAFFI CAREFIN, Centre for Applied Research on International Markets Banking Finance and Regulation, Universita' Bocconi, Milano, Italy.
    5. Shively, Thomas S. & Kockelman, Kara & Damien, Paul, 2010. "A Bayesian semi-parametric model to estimate relationships between crash counts and roadway characteristics," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 44(5), pages 699-715, June.
    6. Vera Chiodi & Gabriel Montes‐Rojas, 2022. "Mentoring as a dose treatment: Frequency matters—Evidence from a French mentoring programme," LABOUR, CEIS, vol. 36(2), pages 145-166, June.
    7. Roberto ESPOSTI, 2014. "To match, not to match, how to match: Estimating the farm-level impact of the CAP-first pillar reform (or: How to Apply Treatment-Effect Econometrics when the Real World is;a Mess)," Working Papers 403, Universita' Politecnica delle Marche (I), Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche e Sociali.
    8. Alexander Henzi & Johanna F. Ziegel & Tilmann Gneiting, 2021. "Isotonic distributional regression," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 83(5), pages 963-993, November.
    9. Sinyolo, Sikhulumile, 2020. "Technology adoption and household food security among rural households in South Africa: The role of improved maize varieties," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    10. Shively, Thomas S. & Walker, Stephen G. & Damien, Paul, 2011. "Nonparametric function estimation subject to monotonicity, convexity and other shape constraints," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 161(2), pages 166-181, April.
    11. Cai, Bo & Dunson, David B., 2007. "Bayesian Multivariate Isotonic Regression Splines: Applications to Carcinogenicity Studies," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 102, pages 1158-1171, December.
    12. Alejo, Javier & Galvao, Antonio F. & Montes-Rojas, Gabriel, 2018. "Quantile continuous treatment effects," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 8(C), pages 13-36.
    13. Finn McGuire & Noemi Kreif & Peter C. Smith, 2021. "The effect of distance on maternal institutional delivery choice: Evidence from Malawi," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(9), pages 2144-2167, September.
    14. Björn Bornkamp & Katja Ickstadt, 2009. "Bayesian Nonparametric Estimation of Continuous Monotone Functions with Applications to Dose–Response Analysis," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 65(1), pages 198-205, March.
    15. Juraj Bodik, 2024. "Extreme Treatment Effect: Extrapolating Dose-Response Function into Extreme Treatment Domain," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-36, May.
    16. Giannetti, Caterina, 2019. "Debt specialization and performance of European firms," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 257-271.
    17. Carl Schmertmann & Emilio Zagheni & Joshua R. Goldstein & Mikko Myrskylä, 2014. "Bayesian Forecasting of Cohort Fertility," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 109(506), pages 500-513, June.
    18. Xingdong Feng & Nell Sedransk & Jessie Q. Xia, 2014. "Calibration using constrained smoothing with applications to mass spectrometry data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 70(2), pages 398-408, June.
    19. John Haslett & Andrew Parnell, 2008. "A simple monotone process with application to radiocarbon‐dated depth chronologies," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 57(4), pages 399-418, September.
    20. Natraj Raman & Jochen L. Leidner, 2018. "Municipal Bond Pricing: A Data Driven Method," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-19, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:36:y:2016:i:6:p:1211-1223. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1539-6924 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.