IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/povpop/v15y2023i4p464-478.html

Triangulating the path: Globalization, development, and migration in developing countries

Author

Listed:
  • A. K. M. Ahsan Ullah
  • Jannatul Ferdous

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to analyze how globalization responds to migration and development. Migration, globalization, and development are interconnected forces shaping our world, where the movement of people across borders, the spread of ideas and technologies, and socioeconomic progress influence and transform societies on a global scale. We argue that the interaction between globalization, migration, and development is three‐way, and that globalization does not always promote migration. To support our argument, we conducted an extensive review of the relevant literature. Content and contextual analyses were also conducted to provide a good overview of contemporary discourse on the three concepts: globalization, migration, and development. Of course, the interaction between globalization and development is controversial. Some argue that globalization has a negative impact on development. Others believe that globalization has been an important factor in reducing poverty and has led to faster improvements in life expectancy and other indicators of progress. We attempt to provide a theoretical framework to explain how globalization, migration, and development affect each other. This study has significant policy implications for both the Global South and the North. 本文旨在分析全球化如何应对移民和发展。移民、全球化和发展是塑造我们世界的相互关联的力量，在这个世界中，人口的跨境流动、思想和技术的传播、以及社会经济进步会在全球范围内影响和改变社会。我们认为，全球化、移民和发展之间的相互作用是三向的，而且全球化并不总是促进移民。为了支持我们的论点，我们对相关文献进行了广泛述评。还进行了内容和情境分析，以概述关于全球化、移民和发展这三个概念的当代话语。当然，全球化与发展之间的相互作用是有争议的。一些人认为，全球化对发展产生负面影响。另一些人则认为，全球化是减贫的一个重要因素，并更快地提升了预期寿命和其他进步指标。我们试图提供一个理论框架来解释全球化、移民和发展如何相互影响。本研究对南方国家和北方国家都具有重大的政策启示。 El propósito de este artículo es analizar cómo la globalización responde a la migración y el desarrollo. La migración, la globalización y el desarrollo son fuerzas interconectadas que dan forma a nuestro mundo, donde el movimiento de personas a través de las fronteras, la difusión de ideas y tecnologías y el progreso socioeconómico influyen y transforman las sociedades a escala global. Sostenemos que la interacción entre globalización, migración y desarrollo es triple y que la globalización no siempre promueve la migración. Para respaldar nuestro argumento, realizamos una revisión extensa de la literatura relevante. También se realizaron análisis de contenido y contexto para proporcionar una buena visión general del discurso contemporáneo sobre los tres conceptos: globalización, migración y desarrollo. Por supuesto, la interacción entre globalización y desarrollo es controvertida. Algunos sostienen que la globalización tiene un impacto negativo en el desarrollo. Otros creen que la globalización ha sido un factor importante en la reducción de la pobreza y ha llevado a mejoras más rápidas en la esperanza de vida y otros indicadores de progreso. Intentamos proporcionar un marco teórico para explicar cómo la globalización, la migración y el desarrollo se afectan entre sí. Este estudio tiene importantes implicaciones políticas tanto para el Sur como para el Norte Global.

Suggested Citation

  • A. K. M. Ahsan Ullah & Jannatul Ferdous, 2023. "Triangulating the path: Globalization, development, and migration in developing countries," Poverty & Public Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(4), pages 464-478, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:povpop:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:464-478
    DOI: 10.1002/pop4.386
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/pop4.386
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/pop4.386?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Baldwin, David A., 1980. "Interdependence and power: a conceptual analysis," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 34(4), pages 471-506, October.
    2. José Antonio Ocampo & Juan Martin, 2003. "Globalization and Development : A Latin American and Caribbean Perspective," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 14455, April.
    3. Caporaso, James A., 1978. "Dependence, dependency, and power in the global system: a structural and behavioral analysis," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 32(1), pages 13-43, January.
    4. Tetreault, Mary Ann, 1980. "Measuring interdependence," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 34(3), pages 429-443, July.
    5. Justine Kyove & Katerina Streltsova & Ufuoma Odibo & Giuseppe T. Cirella, 2021. "Globalization Impact on Multinational Enterprises," World, MDPI, vol. 2(2), pages 1-15, April.
    6. Duvall, Raymond D., 1978. "Dependence and dependencia theory: notes toward precision of concept and argument," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 32(1), pages 51-78, January.
    7. Ramírez, Juan Carlos & Ventura-Dias, Vivianne & Bárcena, Alicia & Lahera, Eugenio, 2003. "Globalization and Development: A Latin American and Caribbean Perspective," IDB Publications (Books), Inter-American Development Bank, number 344, June.
    8. Shujing Li & Jiaping Qiu & Chi Wan, 2011. "Corporate globalization and bank lending," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 42(8), pages 1016-1042, October.
    9. Nasim Masoudi & Nazar Dahmarde & Marziye Esfandiyari, 2017. "Exploring the Relationship between Globalization and Economic Growth in Selected Countries of Middle East," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 7(5), pages 338-344.
    10. Li-Qun Wei & Chung-Ming Lau, 2008. "The impact of market orientation and strategic HRM on firm performance: the case of Chinese enterprises," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 39(6), pages 980-995, September.
    11. Thomas W. Hertel & Terrie Walmsley & Ken Itakura, 2005. "Dynamic Effects Of The "New Age" Free Trade Agreement Between Japan And Singapore," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Philippa Dee & Michael Ferrantino (ed.), Quantitative Methods For Assessing The Effects Of Non-Tariff Measures And Trade Facilitation, chapter 18, pages 483-523, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    12. Thomas W. Hertel & Terrie Walmsley & Ken Itakura, 2005. "Dynamic Effects Of The "New Age" Free Trade Agreement Between Japan And Singapore," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Philippa Dee & Michael Ferrantino (ed.), Quantitative Methods For Assessing The Effects Of Non-Tariff Measures And Trade Facilitation, chapter 18, pages 483-523, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    13. Kaiser, Karl, 1971. "Transnational Politics: Toward a Theory of Multinational Politics," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 25(4), pages 790-817, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zeev Maoz, 2009. "The Effects of Strategic and Economic Interdependence on International Conflict Across Levels of Analysis," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 53(1), pages 223-240, January.
    2. Richard Pomfret & Uwe Kaufmann & Christopher Findlay, 2010. "Are Preferential Tariffs Utilized? Evidence from Australian Imports, 2000-9," Adelaide Economics Working Papers 2010-13, Adelaide University, School of Economics.
    3. Fugazza, Marco & Maur, Jean-Christophe, 2008. "Non-tariff barriers in CGE models: How useful for policy?," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 475-490.
    4. Díaz-Bonilla, Carolina, 2007. "Poverty and Income Distribution Under Different Factor Market Assumptions: A Macro-Micro Model," Conference papers 331625, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    5. Peter Walkenhorst & Tadashi Yasui, 2004. "Quantitative Assessment of the Benefits of Trade Facilitation," International Trade 0401008, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Susan Stone & Anna Strutt, 2010. "Transport Infrastructure and Trade Facilitation in the Greater Mekong Subregion," Chapters, in: Douglas H. Brooks & Susan F. Stone (ed.), Trade Facilitation and Regional Cooperation in Asia, chapter 5, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    7. Phouphet Kyophilavong & Xaignasack Lassachack & Thanouxay Volavong, 2016. "Do cash transfers help the poor during trade liberalization? Evidence from Laos," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 19(4), pages 355-371, December.
    8. ., 2012. "Socio-economic impact of regional transport infrastructure in the Greater Mekong Subregion," Chapters, in: Biswa Nath Bhattacharyay & Masahiro Kawai & Rajat M. Nag (ed.), Infrastructure for Asian Connectivity, chapter 4, pages 95-138, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    9. Benjamin P. Warner & Daniel L. Childers & Christopher Kuzdas & Gabriela Stocks, 2018. "Smallholder Adaptation to Drought in Costa Rica's Crony Capitalist Rice Economy," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 49(6), pages 1392-1421, November.
    10. A. A. Alikhanov & V. Yu. Skryabina & E. V. Tarasyuk, 0. "Liberalization Trade Relationship Between The Countries: Assessment And Consequences," International Trade and Trade Policy, ФГБОУ ВО "Ð Ð¾Ñ Ñ Ð¸Ð¹Ñ ÐºÐ¸Ð¹ Ñ ÐºÐ¾Ð½Ð¾Ð¼Ð¸Ñ‡ÐµÑ ÐºÐ¸Ð¹ ÑƒÐ½Ð¸Ð²ÐµÑ€Ñ Ð¸Ñ‚ÐµÑ‚ им. Г.Ð’. Плеханова", issue 3.
    11. Befus, Tanja & Brockmeier, Martina & Bektasoglu, Beyhan, 2012. "Comparing Gravity Model Specifications to Estimate NTBs Using the GTAP Framework," Conference papers 332178, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    12. Huang, Qingbo & Zhang, Xiaohan & Li, Yan, 2023. "Study on the economic effects of China and ASEAN countries from the New International Land-Sea Trade Corridor," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 123-135.
    13. Rolf J. Langhammer & Daniel Piazolo & Horst Siebert, 2002. "Assessing Proposals for a Transatlantic Free Trade Area," Aussenwirtschaft, University of St. Gallen, School of Economics and Political Science, Swiss Institute for International Economics and Applied Economics Research, vol. 57(02), pages 161-186, June.
    14. Wang, Zhi, 2003. "WTO accession, the "Greater China" free-trade area, and economic integration across the Taiwan Strait," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 14(3), pages 316-349.
    15. Ebenezer OLUBIYI, 2015. "Effects of Trade Facilitation on Inequality: A Case Study of Sub-Sahara Africa," Turkish Economic Review, KSP Journals, vol. 2(3), pages 169-185, September.
    16. Wilson,John S. & Mann, Catherine L. & Otsuki, Tsunehiro, 2003. "Trade facilitation and economic development : measuring the impact," Policy Research Working Paper Series 2988, The World Bank.
    17. Soloaga, Isidro & Wilson, John S. & Mejia, Alejandro, 2006. "Moving forward faster : trade facilitation reform and Mexican competitiveness," Policy Research Working Paper Series 3953, The World Bank.
    18. Marco Fugazza & Jean-Christophe Maur, 2008. "Non-Tariff Barriers In Computable General Equilibrium Modelling," UNCTAD Blue Series Papers 38, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
    19. Walmsley, Terrie & Strutt, Anna, 2019. "Modelling Non-Tariff Barriers as an Exporter Cost," Conference papers 333043, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    20. N. AMINIAN & Cuauhtémoc CALDERON, 2006. "Japanese Direct Investment Determinants and the Prospects for Economic Cooperation in Northeast Asia," LEO Working Papers / DR LEO 829, Orleans Economics Laboratory / Laboratoire d'Economie d'Orleans (LEO), University of Orleans.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:povpop:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:464-478. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1944-2858 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.