IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/navres/v56y2009i8p714-729.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

New product introduction against a predator: A bilevel mixed‐integer programming approach

Author

Listed:
  • J. Cole Smith
  • Churlzu Lim
  • Aydın Alptekinoğlu

Abstract

We consider a scenario with two firms determining which products to develop and introduce to the market. In this problem, there exists a finite set of potential products and market segments. Each market segment has a preference list of products and will buy its most preferred product among those available. The firms play a Stackelberg game in which the leader firm first introduces a set of products, and the follower responds with its own set of products. The leader's goal is to maximize its profit subject to a product introduction budget, assuming that the follower will attempt to minimize the leader's profit using a budget of its own. We formulate this problem as a multistage integer program amenable to decomposition techniques. Using this formulation, we develop three variations of an exact mathematical programming method for solving the multistage problem, along with a family of heuristic procedures for estimating the follower solution. The efficacy of our approaches is demonstrated on randomly generated test instances. This article contributes to the operations research literature a multistage algorithm that directly addresses difficulties posed by degeneracy, and contributes to the product variety literature an exact optimization algorithm for a novel competitive product introduction problem. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Naval Research Logistics, 2009

Suggested Citation

  • J. Cole Smith & Churlzu Lim & Aydın Alptekinoğlu, 2009. "New product introduction against a predator: A bilevel mixed‐integer programming approach," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 56(8), pages 714-729, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:56:y:2009:i:8:p:714-729
    DOI: 10.1002/nav.20375
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.20375
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/nav.20375?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thonemann, Ulrich W. & Bradley, James R., 2002. "The effect of product variety on supply-chain performance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 143(3), pages 548-569, December.
    2. John R. Hauser & Steven M. Shugan, 2008. "Defensive Marketing Strategies," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(1), pages 88-110, 01-02.
    3. Diwakar Gupta & Mandyam M. Srinivasan, 1998. "Note: How Does Product Proliferation Affect Responsiveness?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(7), pages 1017-1020, July.
    4. Kelvin Lancaster, 1990. "The Economics of Product Variety: A Survey," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 9(3), pages 189-206.
    5. Champsaur, Paul & Rochet, Jean-Charles, 1989. "Multiproduct Duopolists," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 57(3), pages 533-557, May.
    6. Gregory Dobson & Shlomo Kalish, 1988. "Positioning and Pricing a Product Line," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 7(2), pages 107-125.
    7. Ayd{i}n Alptekinou{g}lu & Charles J. Corbett, 2008. "Mass Customization vs. Mass Production: Variety and Price Competition," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 10(2), pages 204-217, August.
    8. Abdullah Dasci & Gilbert Laporte, 2005. "A Continuous Model for Multistore Competitive Location," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 53(2), pages 263-280, April.
    9. Rhim, Hosun & Ho, Teck H. & Karmarkar, Uday S., 2003. "Competitive location, production, and market selection," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(1), pages 211-228, August.
    10. Vishal Gaur & Dorothée Honhon, 2006. "Assortment Planning and Inventory Decisions Under a Locational Choice Model," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(10), pages 1528-1543, October.
    11. Pittman, Russell W., 1984. "Predatory investment U.S. vs. IBM," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 2(4), pages 341-365, December.
    12. Richard D. McBride & Fred S. Zufryden, 1988. "An Integer Programming Approach to the Optimal Product Line Selection Problem," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 7(2), pages 126-140.
    13. Garrett van Ryzin & Siddharth Mahajan, 1999. "On the Relationship Between Inventory Costs and Variety Benefits in Retail Assortments," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(11), pages 1496-1509, November.
    14. Andrew Lim & Brian Rodrigues & Zhou Xu, 2008. "Transportation Procurement with Seasonally Varying Shipper Demand and Volume Guarantees," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 56(3), pages 758-771, June.
    15. Brian T. Ratchford, 1990. "Commentary on “Marketing Applications of the Economics of Product Variety”," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 9(3), pages 207-211.
    16. Bacel Maddah & Ebru K. Bish, 2007. "Joint pricing, assortment, and inventory decisions for a retailer's product line," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 54(3), pages 315-330, April.
    17. Tallys H. Yunes & Dominic Napolitano & Alan Scheller-Wolf & Sridhar Tayur, 2007. "Building Efficient Product Portfolios at John Deere and Company," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 55(4), pages 615-629, August.
    18. Sridhar Balasubramanian, 1998. "Mail versus Mall: A Strategic Analysis of Competition between Direct Marketers and Conventional Retailers," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(3), pages 181-195.
    19. Anantaram Balakrishnan & Thomas Magnanti & Joel Sokol & Yi Wang, 2001. "Telecommunication Link Restoration Planning with Multiple Facility Types," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 106(1), pages 127-154, September.
    20. Siddharth Mahajan & Garrett van Ryzin, 2001. "Inventory Competition Under Dynamic Consumer Choice," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 49(5), pages 646-657, October.
    21. Hau L. Lee & Christopher S. Tang, 1997. "Modelling the Costs and Benefits of Delayed Product Differentiation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(1), pages 40-53, January.
    22. Dimitris Bertsimas & Georgia Perakis & Sridhar Tayur, 2000. "A New Algebraic Geometry Algorithm for Integer Programming," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(7), pages 999-1008, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mike Prince & J. Cole Smith & Joseph Geunes, 2013. "A three‐stage procurement optimization problem under uncertainty," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 60(5), pages 395-412, August.
    2. Smith, J. Cole & Song, Yongjia, 2020. "A survey of network interdiction models and algorithms," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 283(3), pages 797-811.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ayd{i}n Alptekinou{g}lu & Charles J. Corbett, 2008. "Mass Customization vs. Mass Production: Variety and Price Competition," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 10(2), pages 204-217, August.
    2. Haim Mendelson & Ali K. Parlaktürk, 2008. "Product-Line Competition: Customization vs. Proliferation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(12), pages 2039-2053, December.
    3. Dorothee Honhon & Sreelata Jonnalagedda & Xiajun Amy Pan, 2012. "Optimal Algorithms for Assortment Selection Under Ranking-Based Consumer Choice Models," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 14(2), pages 279-289, April.
    4. Wallace J. Hopp & Xiaowei Xu, 2008. "A Static Approximation for Dynamic Demand Substitution with Applications in a Competitive Market," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 56(3), pages 630-645, June.
    5. Nan Xia & S. Rajagopalan, 2009. "Standard vs. Custom Products: Variety, Lead Time, and Price Competition," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(5), pages 887-900, 09-10.
    6. Shin, Hojung & Park, Soohoon & Lee, Euncheol & Benton, W.C., 2015. "A classification of the literature on the planning of substitutable products," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 246(3), pages 686-699.
    7. Shanshan Guo & H. Sebastian Heese, 2017. "Product variety and distribution channel structure," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(12), pages 3392-3410, June.
    8. Xiao, Tiaojun & Xu, Tiantian, 2014. "Pricing and product line strategy in a supply chain with risk-averse players," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 305-315.
    9. Hongmin Li & Scott Webster & Gwangjae Yu, 2020. "Product Design Under Multinomial Logit Choices: Optimization of Quality and Prices in an Evolving Product Line," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(5), pages 1011-1025, September.
    10. Wan, Xiang & Britto, Rodrigo & Zhou, Zenan, 2020. "In search of the negative relationship between product variety and inventory turnover," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    11. Wilhelm, Wilbert E. & Xu, Kaihong, 2002. "Prescribing product upgrades, prices and production levels over time in a stochastic environment," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 138(3), pages 601-621, May.
    12. Xiao, Tiaojun & Choi, Tsan-Ming & Cheng, T.C.E., 2014. "Product variety and channel structure strategy for a retailer-Stackelberg supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 233(1), pages 114-124.
    13. Jalali, Hamed & Carmen, Raïsa & Van Nieuwenhuyse, Inneke & Boute, Robert, 2019. "Quality and pricing decisions in production/inventory systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 272(1), pages 195-206.
    14. Maria Mayorga & Hyun-Soo Ahn & Goker Aydin, 2013. "Assortment and inventory decisions with multiple quality levels," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 211(1), pages 301-331, December.
    15. Li Chen & Yao Cui & Hau L. Lee, 2021. "Retailing with 3D Printing," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(7), pages 1986-2007, July.
    16. Pol Boada-Collado & Victor Martínez-de-Albéniz, 2020. "Estimating and Optimizing the Impact of Inventory on Consumer Choices in a Fashion Retail Setting," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(3), pages 582-597, May.
    17. Guodong (Gordon) Gao & Lorin M. Hitt, 2012. "Information Technology and Trademarks: Implications for Product Variety," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 58(6), pages 1211-1226, June.
    18. Kamalini Ramdas & Mohanbir S. Sawhney, 2001. "A Cross-Functional Approach to Evaluating Multiple Line Extensions for Assembled Products," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(1), pages 22-36, January.
    19. Haim Mendelson & Ali K. Parlaktürk, 2008. "Competitive Customization," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 10(3), pages 377-390, October.
    20. Sarangi, Subrat & Chakraborty, Abhishek & Triantis, Konstantinos P., 2021. "Multimarket competition effects on product line decisions – A multi-objective decision model in fast moving consumer goods industry," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 388-398.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:56:y:2009:i:8:p:714-729. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6750 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.