IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/mgtdec/v46y2025i3p1571-1583.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Outsourcing Strategy Selection of Original Brand Manufacturers in the Fashion Industry Under the Influence of Brand Spillover

Author

Listed:
  • Bing Jiang
  • Zhou Fang

Abstract

Outsourcing strategy plays an essential role in manufacturing production. Compared to traditional manufacturing industries, brand spillover behavior from contract manufacturers is more prominent in the fashion industry's outsourcing practices. Therefore, we have developed a model for original brand manufacturers (OBM) to choose an outsourcing strategy under the influence of various factors: OBM can outsource production to a competing manufacturer (CM), a non‐competing manufacturer (NCM), or produce internally. If CM is the only contractor for OBM, it will enhance its brand power through brand spillover. If NCM is the only contractor for OBM, there are quality control issues. In summary, we consider three outsourcing strategies for the OBM: outsourcing production to CM, outsourcing to NCM, or establishing internal production, which correspond to strategies C, N, and F, respectively. We find that the brand spillover has a greater impact on OBM than expected. It affects OBM's production planning by influencing market demand, resulting in the profit of strategy C always being lower than strategy N. This forces OBM to face quality control issues. On this basis, we discuss blockchain technology that enables OBM to address quality control issues while dealing with brand spillovers. Interestingly, blockchain technology does not always bring benefits and can only solve problems under specific conditions. In addition, we also prove that the dual‐source strategy, that is, OBM outsources production to CM and NCM simultaneously, is better than the C and N strategies, but whether it is better than the F strategies depends on the investment cost.

Suggested Citation

  • Bing Jiang & Zhou Fang, 2025. "Outsourcing Strategy Selection of Original Brand Manufacturers in the Fashion Industry Under the Influence of Brand Spillover," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 46(3), pages 1571-1583, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:46:y:2025:i:3:p:1571-1583
    DOI: 10.1002/mde.4454
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.4454
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/mde.4454?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sara Saberi & Mahtab Kouhizadeh & Joseph Sarkis & Lejia Shen, 2019. "Blockchain technology and its relationships to sustainable supply chain management," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(7), pages 2117-2135, April.
    2. Huang, He & Xu, Hongyan, 2015. "Dual sourcing and backup production: Coexistence versus exclusivity," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 57(PA), pages 22-33.
    3. Brian Tomlin, 2006. "On the Value of Mitigation and Contingency Strategies for Managing Supply Chain Disruption Risks," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(5), pages 639-657, May.
    4. Bin Shen & Qingying Li & Ciwei Dong & Vincent Quan, 2016. "Design outsourcing in the fashion supply chain: OEM versus ODM," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 67(2), pages 259-268, February.
    5. Mills, David E, 1995. "Why Retailers Sell Private Labels," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 4(3), pages 509-528, Fall.
    6. Yimin Wang & Wendell Gilland & Brian Tomlin, 2010. "Mitigating Supply Risk: Dual Sourcing or Process Improvement?," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 12(3), pages 489-510, September.
    7. Zhang, Kun & Choi, Tsan-Ming & Chung, Sai-Ho & Dai, Yue & Wen, Xin, 2024. "Blockchain adoption in retail operations: Stablecoins and traceability," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 315(1), pages 147-160.
    8. Li, Qiu-xiang & Ji, Hui-min & Huang, Yi-min, 2022. "The information leakage strategies of the supply chain under the block chain technology introduction," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    9. Jan Klostermann & Tobias K. Hinze & Franziska Völckner & Ann-Kristin Kupfer & Rouven Schwerdtfeger, 2024. "Avengers, assemble! A network-based contingency analysis of spillover effects in multi-brand alliances," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 52(2), pages 449-469, March.
    10. Zhang, Zhiming & Ren, Da & Lan, Yanfei & Yang, Shanxue, 2022. "Price competition and blockchain adoption in retailing markets," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 300(2), pages 647-660.
    11. Chen, Jingxian & Liang, Liang & Yao, Dong-qing, 2019. "Factory encroachment and channel selection in an outsourced supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 73-83.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Papachristos, Ioannis & Pandelis, Dimitrios G., 2022. "Newsvendor models with random supply capacity and backup sourcing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(3), pages 1231-1243.
    2. Xiang Li, 2017. "Optimal procurement strategies from suppliers with random yield and all-or-nothing risks," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 257(1), pages 167-181, October.
    3. Li, Yongjian & Zhen, Xueping & Qi, Xiangtong & Cai, Gangshu (George), 2016. "Penalty and financial assistance in a supply chain with supply disruption," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 167-181.
    4. Long He & Ying Rong & Zuo‐Jun Max Shen, 2020. "Product Sourcing and Distribution Strategies under Supply Disruption and Recall Risks," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(1), pages 9-23, January.
    5. Liu, Zhongyi & Li, Mengyu & Zhai, Xin, 2022. "Managing supply chain disruption threat via a strategy combining pricing and self-protection," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    6. Svoboda, Josef & Minner, Stefan & Yao, Man, 2021. "Typology and literature review on multiple supplier inventory control models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 293(1), pages 1-23.
    7. Huang, Hongfu & He, Yong & Li, Dong & Li, Shanshan, 2023. "Competing multinationals’ backshoring decisions: Tax arbitrage versus production reliability tradeoff," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 311(2), pages 515-532.
    8. Huang, He & Xu, Hongyan, 2015. "Dual sourcing and backup production: Coexistence versus exclusivity," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 57(PA), pages 22-33.
    9. Soroush Saghafian & Mark P. Van Oyen, 2016. "Compensating for Dynamic Supply Disruptions: Backup Flexibility Design," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 64(2), pages 390-405, April.
    10. Joann F. de Zegher & Dan A. Iancu & Hau L. Lee, 2019. "Designing Contracts and Sourcing Channels to Create Shared Value," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 21(2), pages 271-289, May.
    11. Shanshan Guo & Lei Zhao & Xiaowei Xu, 2016. "Impact of supply risks on procurement decisions," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 241(1), pages 411-430, June.
    12. Li, Qingying & Ma, Manqiong & Shi, Tianqin & Zhu, Chen, 2022. "Green investment in a sustainable supply chain: The role of blockchain and fairness," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    13. Chung‐Yee Lee & Tao Lu, 2015. "Inventory competition with yield reliability improvement," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 62(2), pages 107-126, March.
    14. Dou, Runliang & Liu, Xin & Lin, Kuo-Yi & Yan, Xuan, 2024. "Internal- and external-sourcing strategy analysis of group manufacturing enterprises under semiconductor supply chain disruption risk," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    15. Jain, Tarun & Hazra, Jishnu, 2017. "Sourcing strategies under agglomeration economies, capacity risks and retail competition," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 311-322.
    16. Seung Hwan Jung, 2020. "Offshore versus Onshore Sourcing: Quick Response, Random Yield, and Competition," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(3), pages 750-766, March.
    17. Kelei Xue & Ya Xu & Lipan Feng, 2018. "Managing Procurement for a Firm with Two Ordering Opportunities under Supply Disruption Risk," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-32, September.
    18. Liao, Changhua & Lu, Qihui & Ghamat, Salar & Cai, Helen Huifen, 2025. "Blockchain adoption and coordination strategies for green supply chains considering consumer privacy concern," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 323(2), pages 525-539.
    19. Hsieh, Chung-Chi & Wu, Ching-Yu & Lathifah, Artya, 2025. "Cross-channel influence of blockchain technology on green supply chains under asymmetric retail platform competition," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    20. Schmitt, Amanda J. & Sun, Siyuan Anthony & Snyder, Lawrence V. & Shen, Zuo-Jun Max, 2015. "Centralization versus decentralization: Risk pooling, risk diversification, and supply chain disruptions," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 201-212.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:46:y:2025:i:3:p:1571-1583. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jhome/7976 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.