IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/mgtdec/v24y2003i5p393-402.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The profitability-risk tradeoff of just-in-time manufacturing technologies

Author

Listed:
  • Jeffrey L. Callen

    (Rotman Faculty of Management, University of Toronto, 105 St. George Street, Toronto, Ont., Canada M5S 3E6)

  • Mindy Morel

    (School of Business Administration, Ben-Gurion University, Beer-Sheva, Israel)

  • Chris Fader

    (Department of Economics, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ont., Canada)

Abstract

Qualitative survey studies and a recent quantitative study by Callen et al. (2000) indicate that JIT manufacturing is more profitable than conventional non-JIT manufacturing. This study tests the hypothesis that the excess profitability of JIT manufacturing just compensates for the additional operational risks of JIT technology relative to conventional manufacturing. An often-suggested alternative hypothesis is that JIT manufacturing dominates conventional manufacturing in reducing costs and increasing revenues and that risk is not an issue. The multivariate results unambiguously reject the hypothesis that excess JIT profits are compensation for additional risk. We find that profitability is inversely related to risk, especially for JIT plants. We also find that the JIT plants in our sample are more profitable than non-JIT plants even after adjusting for risk, consistent with the dominance argument. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeffrey L. Callen & Mindy Morel & Chris Fader, 2003. "The profitability-risk tradeoff of just-in-time manufacturing technologies," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(5), pages 393-402.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:24:y:2003:i:5:p:393-402
    DOI: 10.1002/mde.1104
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1002/mde.1104
    File Function: Link to full text; subscription required
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/mde.1104?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fullerton, Rosemary R. & McWatters, Cheryl S., 2002. "The role of performance measures and incentive systems in relation to the degree of JIT implementation," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 27(8), pages 711-735, November.
    2. Lev, Baruch, 1974. "On the Association between Operating Leverage and Risk," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 9(4), pages 627-641, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anders Johansson, 2009. "An analysis of dynamic risk in the Greater China equity markets," Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(3), pages 299-320.
    2. Karel Janda, 2019. "Earnings Stability and Peer Company Selection for Multiple Based Indirect Valuation," Czech Journal of Economics and Finance (Finance a uver), Charles University Prague, Faculty of Social Sciences, vol. 69(1), pages 37-75, February.
    3. Sengazhani Murugesan Vadivel & Aloysius Henry Sequeira & Robert Rajkumar Sakkariyas & Kirubaharan Boobalan, 2022. "Impact of lean service, workplace environment, and social practices on the operational performance of India post service industry," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 315(2), pages 2219-2244, August.
    4. Ole-Kristian Hope & Danqi Hu & Hai Lu, 2016. "The benefits of specific risk-factor disclosures," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 1005-1045, December.
    5. Groh, Alexander P. & Gottschalg, Oliver, 2009. "The opportunity cost of capital of US buyouts," IESE Research Papers D/780, IESE Business School.
    6. Wulung Li & Ramachandran Natarajan & Yan Zhao & Kenneth Zheng, 2021. "The effect of management control mechanisms through risk-taking incentives on asymmetric cost behavior," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 56(1), pages 219-243, January.
    7. Frank Hartmann & Paolo Perego & Anna Young, 2013. "Carbon Accounting: Challenges for Research in Management Control and Performance Measurement," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 49(4), pages 539-563, December.
    8. Hui Tan & Xinhua Zhang & Lili Zeng, 2023. "Operating Leverage, Equity Incentive, and Enterprise Research and Development Investment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-16, April.
    9. David Johnstone, 2020. "Fama's Ratio and the Effect of Operating Leverage on the Cost of Capital Under CAPM," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 56(2), pages 268-287, June.
    10. Hall, Matthew, 2008. "The effect of comprehensive performance measurement systems on role clarity, psychological empowerment and managerial performance," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 33(2-3), pages 141-163.
    11. Serfling, Matthew A., 2014. "CEO age and the riskiness of corporate policies," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 251-273.
    12. Matthieu Bouvard & Adolfo de Motta, 2021. "Labor leverage, coordination failures, and aggregate risk," Post-Print hal-03524121, HAL.
    13. Udayakumari Vidhyasagara Menon, 2016. "Impact of Capital Structure on Stock Prices: Evidence from Oman," International Journal of Economics and Finance, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(9), pages 249-257, September.
    14. Roi D. Taussig, 2017. "Stickiness of employee expenses and implications for stock returns," Eurasian Economic Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 7(2), pages 297-309, August.
    15. Évelyne Poincelot & Grégory Wegmann, 2005. "Utilisation des critères non financiers pour évaluer ou piloter la performance: analyse théorique," ACCRA, Association francophone de comptabilité, vol. 11(2), pages 109-125.
    16. Shirley Daniel & Dongyoung Lee & Wolf Reitsperger, 2014. "Raising quality consciousness among Chinese manufacturing personnel: Testing the effectiveness of performance management tools," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 31(2), pages 549-573, June.
    17. Xiao, Xinning & Shailer, Greg, 2022. "Stakeholders’ perceptions of factors affecting the credibility of sustainability reports," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 54(1).
    18. Jochen Fähndrich, 2023. "A literature review on the impact of digitalisation on management control," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 9-65, March.
    19. Kothari, S. P., 2001. "Capital markets research in accounting," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(1-3), pages 105-231, September.
    20. Gera Kiewiet & Iman van Lelyveld & Sweder van Wijnbergen, 2017. "Contingent Convertibles: Can the Market Handle them?," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 17-095/VI, Tinbergen Institute.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:24:y:2003:i:5:p:393-402. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jhome/7976 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.