IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jnlaaa/v2014y2014i1n971648.html

Identifying the Best Coach by an Improved AHP Model

Author

Listed:
  • Jinming Xing
  • Chang Zhao
  • Xiao-liang Wang
  • Nan Xiang

Abstract

The evaluation of coaches in college ball game is very essential, since a better choice of coaches will help get more scores for a team. In this paper, a simple, however, comprehensive model is proposed to evaluate college coaches of a century. By comparing the compressive index of different coaches in the evaluation, the top five coaches are found with their influence over time discussed either. Based on data of certain sport, a basic model is introduced. The superimposed application of the model makes it possible for the data of different levels to deliver proper evaluation. And by optimizing the data, we can provide precise evaluation items and authentic synthetic scores for each coach. Among their applications, the models of various sports are obtained in which relatively accurate results are still available. Although a number of deficiencies were disclosed by multiple expansions, this model is still simple, accurate, and valuable to select the best coaches.

Suggested Citation

  • Jinming Xing & Chang Zhao & Xiao-liang Wang & Nan Xiang, 2014. "Identifying the Best Coach by an Improved AHP Model," Abstract and Applied Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2014(1).
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jnlaaa:v:2014:y:2014:i:1:n:971648
    DOI: 10.1155/2014/971648
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/971648
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1155/2014/971648?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wei, Chun-Chin & Chien, Chen-Fu & Wang, Mao-Jiun J., 2005. "An AHP-based approach to ERP system selection," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(1), pages 47-62, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ge, Liping & Voß, Stefan, 2009. "ERP application in China: An overview," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(1), pages 501-507, November.
    2. Kevin Kam Fung Yuen, 2022. "Decision models for information systems planning using primitive cognitive network process: comparisons with analytic hierarchy process," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 1759-1785, July.
    3. Yu-Hsin Lin & Hsien-Ching Chen & Chen-Yu Chien & Chih-Hung Tsai & Min-Jer Lu, 2014. "A Study of Selecting Criteria for Material Substitution under Green Environmental Consideration," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 4(1), pages 459-473, January.
    4. Büşra Dağci Yüksel & Filiz Ersöz, 2024. "Evaluation of ERP software selection criteria with fuzzy AHP approach: an application in the metal production enterprises in the aviation industry," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 15(6), pages 2656-2667, June.
    5. Dimitra Skoumpopoulou & Catherine Moss, 2018. "The Importance of Culture in ERP Adoption – A Case Study Analysis," Athens Journal of Business & Economics, Athens Institute for Education and Research (ATINER), vol. 4(3), pages 259-278, July.
    6. Gholamreza Shojatalab & Seyed Hadi Nasseri & Iraj Mahdavi, 2023. "New multi-objective optimization model for tourism systems with fuzzy data and new approach developed epsilon constraint method," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 60(3), pages 1360-1385, September.
    7. Faramondi, Luca & Oliva, Gabriele & Setola, Roberto & Bozóki, Sándor, 2023. "Robustness to rank reversal in pairwise comparison matrices based on uncertainty bounds," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 304(2), pages 676-688.
    8. Fritz, M. & Canavari, M., . "Management of Perceived Risks in E-Business for Efficient Food Supply Network Management: The Case of Trust," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 43.
    9. Shruti Nagpal & Ashok Kumar & Sunil Kumar Khatri, 2017. "Modeling interrelationships between CSF in ERP implementations: total ISM and MICMAC approach," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 8(4), pages 782-798, December.
    10. Deng, Xinyang & Jiang, Wen & Wang, Zhen, 2020. "An Information Source Selection Model Based on Evolutionary Game Theory," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 385(C).
    11. Nityesh Bhatt & Sunita Guru & Shashank Thanki & Gunjan Sood, 2021. "Analysing the factors affecting the selection of ERP package: a fuzzy AHP approach," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 641-682, June.
    12. He-Yau Kang & Amy H. I. Lee & Yao-Chuan Chan, 2019. "An Integrated Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach for Evaluating Business Process Information Systems," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(10), pages 1-23, October.
    13. Jie Wu & Junfei Chu & Qingyuan Zhu & Pengzhen Yin & Liang Liang, 2016. "DEA cross-efficiency evaluation based on satisfaction degree: an application to technology selection," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(20), pages 5990-6007, October.
    14. Serkan Atmaca & Hacı Ahmet Karadaş, 2020. "Decision making on financial investment in Turkey by using ARDL long-term coefficients and AHP," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 6(1), pages 1-22, December.
    15. Shen, Yung-Chi & Lin, Grace T.R. & Li, Kuang-Pin & Yuan, Benjamin J.C., 2010. "An assessment of exploiting renewable energy sources with concerns of policy and technology," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(8), pages 4604-4616, August.
    16. Cengiz Kerem Kütahya & Bükra Doğaner Duman & Gültekin Altuntaş, 2025. "Multi-Criteria Evaluation of Transportation Management System (TMS) Software: A Bayesian Best–Worst and TOPSIS Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-25, August.
    17. Büyüközkan, Gülçin & Ruan, Da, 2008. "Evaluation of software development projects using a fuzzy multi-criteria decision approach," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 77(5), pages 464-475.
    18. Molnár Bálint & Szabó Gyula & Benczúr András, 2013. "Selection Process of ERP Systems," Business Systems Research, Sciendo, vol. 4(1), pages 36-48, March.
    19. S H Choi & S M Bae, 2009. "Strategic information systems selection with incomplete preferences: a case of a Korean electronics company," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(2), pages 180-190, February.
    20. Rađenović Žarko & Veselinović Ivana, 2017. "Integrated AHP-TOPSIS Method for the Assessment of Health Management Information Systems Efficiency," Economic Themes, Sciendo, vol. 55(1), pages 121-142, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jnlaaa:v:2014:y:2014:i:1:n:971648. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/4058 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.