IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i16p4472-d258731.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the Greenness of Enterprise Resource Planning Systems through Green IT Solutions: A Romanian Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Minodora Ursacescu

    (Faculty of Management, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 6 Romana Square, Bucharest 010374, Romania)

  • Dan Popescu

    (Faculty of Management, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 6 Romana Square, Bucharest 010374, Romania)

  • Cristina State

    (Faculty of Management, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 6 Romana Square, Bucharest 010374, Romania)

  • Ion Smeureanu

    (Faculty of Management, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 6 Romana Square, Bucharest 010374, Romania)

Abstract

Businesses and technology play an important role in the global economy, where the achievement of sustainability goals has a positive impact on society and companies. In this regard, there is a need to integrate information technology and sustainability to enable companies to act in a greener manner. Knowing that the Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system is one of the most powerful business solutions for companies, it is crucial to align its use with sustainability elements through the use of green information technology (IT). We explored the relationship between ERP systems and green IT practices to assess how green IT provides an opportunity for organizations to improve ERP systems in more environmentally responsible initiatives. For that purpose, we empirically analyzed four Romanian economic sectors based on an online survey that contained criteria to explore organizational awareness about developing green ERP systems. The findings indicate that companies are generally focused on the key benefits of ERP systems related to operational aspects and less on the sustainability benefits. Based on these results, the main conclusion highlights the strong need to embed IT in business sustainability initiatives by adopting green IT solutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Minodora Ursacescu & Dan Popescu & Cristina State & Ion Smeureanu, 2019. "Assessing the Greenness of Enterprise Resource Planning Systems through Green IT Solutions: A Romanian Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-32, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:16:p:4472-:d:258731
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/16/4472/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/16/4472/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Helen Hasan, 2012. "Unordered Business Processes, Sustainability and Green IS," Springer Books, in: Jan vom Brocke & Stefan Seidel & Jan Recker (ed.), Green Business Process Management, edition 127, pages 39-58, Springer.
    2. Hua-Hung (Robin) Weng & Ja-Shen Chen & Pei-Ching Chen, 2015. "Effects of Green Innovation on Environmental and Corporate Performance: A Stakeholder Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(5), pages 1-30, April.
    3. Stoney Brooks & Xuequn Wang & Saonee Sarker, 2012. "Unpacking Green IS: A Review of the Existing Literature and Directions for the Future," Springer Books, in: Jan vom Brocke & Stefan Seidel & Jan Recker (ed.), Green Business Process Management, edition 127, pages 15-37, Springer.
    4. Qi Deng & Shaobo Ji, 2015. "Organizational Green IT Adoption: Concept and Evidence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(12), pages 1-19, December.
    5. Robert H. W. Boyer & Nicole D. Peterson & Poonam Arora & Kevin Caldwell, 2016. "Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-18, September.
    6. Ranjit Bose & Xin (Robert) Luo, 2012. "Green IT adoption: a process management approach," International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 20(1), pages 63-77, February.
    7. Wei, Chun-Chin & Chien, Chen-Fu & Wang, Mao-Jiun J., 2005. "An AHP-based approach to ERP system selection," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(1), pages 47-62, April.
    8. Michal Pohludka & Hana Stverkova & Beata Ślusarczyk, 2018. "Implementation and Unification of the ERP System in a Global Company as a Strategic Decision for Sustainable Entrepreneurship," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-16, August.
    9. Ranjit Bose & Xin (Robert) Luo, 2012. "Green IT adoption: a process management approach," International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 20(1), pages 63-77, February.
    10. Stefan Seidel & Jan Recker & Jan Brocke, 2012. "Green Business Process Management," Springer Books, in: Jan vom Brocke & Stefan Seidel & Jan Recker (ed.), Green Business Process Management, edition 127, pages 3-13, Springer.
    11. Umble, Elisabeth J. & Haft, Ronald R. & Umble, M. Michael, 2003. "Enterprise resource planning: Implementation procedures and critical success factors," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 146(2), pages 241-257, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Barna Laura-Eugenia-Lavinia & Ionescu Bogdan-Ștefan & Haralambie Maria-Monica Popescu, 2021. "Using ERP systems for a green company," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 15(1), pages 280-291, December.
    2. Ramona Lacurezeanu & Alexandru Chis & Vasile Paul Bresfelean, 2021. "Integrated Management Solution for a Sustainable SME—Selection Proposal Using AHP," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-23, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alenka Baggia & Matjaž Maletič & Anja Žnidaršič & Alenka Brezavšček, 2019. "Drivers and Outcomes of Green IS Adoption in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-19, March.
    2. Molnár Bálint & Szabó Gyula & Benczúr András, 2013. "Selection Process of ERP Systems," Business Systems Research, Sciendo, vol. 4(1), pages 36-48, March.
    3. B S Ahn & S H Choi, 2008. "ERP system selection using a simulation-based AHP approach: a case of Korean homeshopping company," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 59(3), pages 322-330, March.
    4. Kerim Goztepe & Sahin CETIN & Alper Kayaalp, 2015. "Designing ERP Software Evaluation Procedure for a Governmental Organization," Proceedings of International Academic Conferences 1003266, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
    5. Jan Brocke & Peter Loos & Stefan Seidel & Richard Watson, 2013. "Green IS," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 5(5), pages 295-297, October.
    6. Dimitra Skoumpopoulou & Catherine Moss, 2018. "The Importance of Culture in ERP Adoption – A Case Study Analysis," Athens Journal of Business & Economics, Athens Institute for Education and Research (ATINER), vol. 4(3), pages 259-278, July.
    7. He-Yau Kang & Amy H. I. Lee & Yao-Chuan Chan, 2019. "An Integrated Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach for Evaluating Business Process Information Systems," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(10), pages 1-23, October.
    8. Kusa, Rafał & Suder, Marcin & Duda, Joanna, 2023. "Impact of greening on performance in the hospitality industry: Moderating effect of flexibility and inter-organizational cooperation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    9. Mohammad AL-Zoubi, 2018. "The Role of Technology, Organization, and Environment Factors in Enterprise Resource Planning Implementation Success in Jordan," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(8), pages 48-65, August.
    10. Md. Ahashan Habib & Md. Rezaul Karim & Marzia Dulal & Mohammad Shayekh Munir, 2022. "Impact of Institutional Pressure on Cleaner Production and Sustainable Firm Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-25, December.
    11. Shaorui Xu & Yang Chen & Oleksii Lyulyov & Tetyana Pimonenko, 2023. "Green Technology Innovation and High-Quality Economic Development: Spatial Spillover Effect," Prague Economic Papers, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2023(3), pages 292-319.
    12. Agnieszka Wojewódzka-Wiewiórska & Anna Kłoczko-Gajewska & Piotr Sulewski, 2019. "Between the Social and Economic Dimensions of Sustainability in Rural Areas—In Search of Farmers’ Quality of Life," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-26, December.
    13. Abu Elnasr E. Sobaih & Ahmed Hasanein & Ibrahim Elshaer, 2020. "Influences of Green Human Resources Management on Environmental Performance in Small Lodging Enterprises: The Role of Green Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-19, December.
    14. Kalaivani Jayaraman & Sreenivasan Jayashree & Magiswary Dorasamy, 2023. "The Effects of Green Innovations in Organizations: Influence of Stakeholders," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-13, January.
    15. Akca Yasar & Gokhan Ozer, 2016. "Determination the Factors that Affect the Use of Enterprise Resource Planning Information System through Technology Acceptance Model," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(10), pages 1-91, September.
    16. Suyu Huang & Hanlian Lin & Yongjunbei Zhou & Haonan Ji & Naiping Zhu, 2022. "The Influence of the Policy of Replacing Environmental Protection Fees with Taxes on Enterprise Green Innovation—Evidence from China’s Heavily Polluting Industries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-23, June.
    17. Ge, Liping & Voß, Stefan, 2009. "ERP application in China: An overview," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(1), pages 501-507, November.
    18. Justyna Patalas-Maliszewska & Hanna Łosyk, 2020. "An Approach to Assessing Sustainability in the Development of a Manufacturing Company," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-18, October.
    19. Büyüközkan, Gülçin & Ruan, Da, 2008. "Evaluation of software development projects using a fuzzy multi-criteria decision approach," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 77(5), pages 464-475.
    20. Juha Lukkarinen & Jukka Majava, 2020. "Supplies Inventory Management in a Corporation Context: A Case Study," International Journal of Management, Knowledge and Learning, International School for Social and Business Studies, Celje, Slovenia, vol. 9(2), pages 169-184.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:16:p:4472-:d:258731. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.