IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jjmath/v2022y2022i1n8455404.html

Analysis of the Correlation between Cross‐Border E‐Commerce and Economic Growth Based on Hierarchical Multilevel Gray Evaluation Model

Author

Listed:
  • Nie Chen

Abstract

Cross‐border e‐commerce is a new form of global trade development under the background of “Internet+,” and it is also a new engine driving economic development. Cross‐border e‐commerce is growing rapidly and has broad development prospects. As a pioneering pilot zone for comprehensive cross‐border e‐commerce, it has played a leading role in the development of the country’s cross‐border e‐commerce industry. This paper takes China’s 35 cross‐border e‐commerce comprehensive pilot areas as the research object, selects the annual data of 31 provinces across the country, and conducts an empirical research based on the gray‐related Internet development level and economic growth. It analyzes the influencing factors of cross‐border e‐commerce development, constructs a cross‐border e‐commerce development influencing factor model, and applies gray theory to conduct an empirical analysis of the correlation between cross‐border e‐commerce development influencing factors and cross‐border e‐commerce. The research results show that foreign direct investment has the greatest correlation with the number of websites and webpages; the number of patent applications has the greatest correlation with the number of domains and websites; the total fixed assets have the greatest correlation with the number of Internet users and the number of mobile phones at the end of the year; the total amount of foreign investment enterprises in and out. It has the greatest correlation with the number of URLs and Webpages; GDP has the greatest correlation with the number of Internet users and the number of mobile phones at the end of the year. The Internet infrastructure and popularity have a close relationship with economic growth, and the relationship between foreign investment and patent applications and the level of Internet development is more significant.

Suggested Citation

  • Nie Chen, 2022. "Analysis of the Correlation between Cross‐Border E‐Commerce and Economic Growth Based on Hierarchical Multilevel Gray Evaluation Model," Journal of Mathematics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2022(1).
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jjmath:v:2022:y:2022:i:1:n:8455404
    DOI: 10.1155/2022/8455404
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8455404
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1155/2022/8455404?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Takashi Hayashi & Ryoko Wada, 2010. "Choice with imprecise information: an experimental approach," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 69(3), pages 355-373, September.
    2. Peter Klibanoff & Massimo Marinacci & Sujoy Mukerji, 2005. "A Smooth Model of Decision Making under Ambiguity," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 73(6), pages 1849-1892, November.
    3. Byun, Jaemun & Jang, SooCheong (Shawn), 2015. "Effective destination advertising: Matching effect between advertising language and destination type," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 31-40.
    4. Christian K. Karl, 2016. "Investigating the Winner’s Curse Based on Decision Making in an Auction Environment," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 47(3), pages 324-345, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhaoying Ouyang, 2022. "Construction and Application of Economic Management Fuzzy Decision Model Based on Fuzzy Relevance Method," Journal of Mathematics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2022(1).
    2. Xiaoxuan Wang & Jingjing Wang & Ying Zhang & Yixing Du, 2022. "Analysis of Local Macroeconomic Early‐Warning Model Based on Competitive Neural Network," Journal of Mathematics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2022(1).
    3. Yuting Zhao & Yupeng Fang, 2022. "Financial Account Audit Early Warning Based on Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation and Random Forest Model," Journal of Mathematics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2022(1).
    4. Kuizhen Rong, 2022. "Analysis of the Comprehensive Evaluation Model of Enterprise Technological Innovation Ability Based on Improved Genetic Algorithm," Journal of Mathematics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2022(1).
    5. Chao Pang, 2022. "Construction and Analysis of Macroeconomic Forecasting Model Based on Biclustering Algorithm," Journal of Mathematics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2022(1).
    6. Amit Kothiyal & Vitalie Spinu & Peter Wakker, 2014. "An experimental test of prospect theory for predicting choice under ambiguity," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 48(1), pages 1-17, February.
    7. Larry G Epstein & Yoram Halevy, 2024. "Hard-to-Interpret Signals," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 22(1), pages 393-427.
    8. Georgalos, Konstantinos, 2021. "Dynamic decision making under ambiguity: An experimental investigation," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 28-46.
    9. Mulwa, Chalmers & Visser, Martine & Gitonga, Zachary, 2019. "Weather Uncertainty and Demand for Information in Agricultural Technology Adoption: The Case of Namibia," EfD Discussion Paper 19-25, Environment for Development, University of Gothenburg.
    10. Visser, Martine & Mulwa, Chalmers K. & Gitonga, Zachary & Baard, Max, 2025. "Weather uncertainty and demand for information in technology adoption: Case of Namibia," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    11. Horváth, Ferenc, 2017. "Essays on robust asset pricing," Other publications TiSEM e54d7b33-1f27-4b0e-9f84-f, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    12. John D. Hey & Yudistira Permana & Nuttaporn Rochanahastin, 2018. "When and how to satisfice: an experimental investigation," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Experiments in Economics Decision Making and Markets, chapter 5, pages 121-137, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    13. Konstantinos Georgalos, 2019. "An experimental test of the predictive power of dynamic ambiguity models," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 59(1), pages 51-83, August.
    14. Fujikawa, Takemi, 2009. "The hot stove effect in repeated-play decision making under ambiguity," MPRA Paper 17647, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Hansen, Lars Peter, 2013. "Uncertainty Outside and Inside Economic Models," Nobel Prize in Economics documents 2013-7, Nobel Prize Committee.
    16. Luca De Gennaro Aquino & Sascha Desmettre & Yevhen Havrylenko & Mogens Steffensen, 2024. "Equilibrium control theory for Kihlstrom-Mirman preferences in continuous time," Papers 2407.16525, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2024.
    17. Karantounias, Anastasios G., 2023. "Doubts about the model and optimal policy," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    18. Cerreia-Vioglio, Simone & Maccheroni, Fabio & Marinacci, Massimo & Montrucchio, Luigi, 2012. "Probabilistic sophistication, second order stochastic dominance and uncertainty aversion," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(5), pages 271-283.
    19. ,, 2014. "Second order beliefs models of choice under imprecise risk: non-additive second order beliefs vs. nonlinear second order utility," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 9(3), September.
    20. Christian Gollier & James Hammitt & Nicolas Treich, 2013. "Risk and choice: A research saga," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 129-145, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jjmath:v:2022:y:2022:i:1:n:8455404. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/1469 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.