IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jjmath/v2022y2022i1n9878815.html

Construction and Application of Economic Management Fuzzy Decision Model Based on Fuzzy Relevance Method

Author

Listed:
  • Zhaoying Ouyang

Abstract

Fuzzy mathematics has been used more and more extensively and deeply in various fields since its emergence, and it has been more and more recognized. However, there is less research on fuzzy mathematics in the field of economic management. This paper attempts to introduce fuzzy theories and methods into economic management. On the premise of introducing fuzzy decision‐making theories and methods, several fuzzy theories and methods that are commonly used in economic management are given. The fuzzy correlation method of economic phenomena is proposed, and the method is used to study the correlation between economic phenomena. Besides, this paper also uses fuzzy methods to analyze the relationship between economic phenomena—fuzzy relevance, and uses fuzzy two‐way decision‐making methods to carry out economic management and decision‐making so that the decision‐making results are more reasonable, scientific, and operability. In addition, this paper rationally explains the phenomena and laws existing in economic activities from a fuzzy perspective and gives models for fuzzy inference, diagnosis, and production decision‐making, which have important meaning and profound theoretical value and practical value.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhaoying Ouyang, 2022. "Construction and Application of Economic Management Fuzzy Decision Model Based on Fuzzy Relevance Method," Journal of Mathematics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2022(1).
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jjmath:v:2022:y:2022:i:1:n:9878815
    DOI: 10.1155/2022/9878815
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9878815
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1155/2022/9878815?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Takashi Hayashi & Ryoko Wada, 2010. "Choice with imprecise information: an experimental approach," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 69(3), pages 355-373, September.
    2. Yoram Halevy, 2007. "Ellsberg Revisited: An Experimental Study," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 75(2), pages 503-536, March.
    3. Peter Klibanoff & Massimo Marinacci & Sujoy Mukerji, 2005. "A Smooth Model of Decision Making under Ambiguity," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 73(6), pages 1849-1892, November.
    4. David Easley & Maureen O'Hara, 2009. "Ambiguity and Nonparticipation: The Role of Regulation," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 22(5), pages 1817-1843, May.
    5. Byun, Jaemun & Jang, SooCheong (Shawn), 2015. "Effective destination advertising: Matching effect between advertising language and destination type," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 31-40.
    6. Christian K. Karl, 2016. "Investigating the Winner’s Curse Based on Decision Making in an Auction Environment," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 47(3), pages 324-345, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiaoxuan Wang & Jingjing Wang & Ying Zhang & Yixing Du, 2022. "Analysis of Local Macroeconomic Early‐Warning Model Based on Competitive Neural Network," Journal of Mathematics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2022(1).
    2. Yuting Zhao & Yupeng Fang, 2022. "Financial Account Audit Early Warning Based on Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation and Random Forest Model," Journal of Mathematics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2022(1).
    3. Kuizhen Rong, 2022. "Analysis of the Comprehensive Evaluation Model of Enterprise Technological Innovation Ability Based on Improved Genetic Algorithm," Journal of Mathematics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2022(1).
    4. Georgalos, Konstantinos, 2021. "Dynamic decision making under ambiguity: An experimental investigation," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 28-46.
    5. Nie Chen, 2022. "Analysis of the Correlation between Cross‐Border E‐Commerce and Economic Growth Based on Hierarchical Multilevel Gray Evaluation Model," Journal of Mathematics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2022(1).
    6. Milos Borozan & Loreta Cannito & Barbara Luppi, 2022. "A tale of two ambiguities: A conceptual overview of findings from economics and psychology," Journal of Behavioral Economics for Policy, Society for the Advancement of Behavioral Economics (SABE), vol. 6(S1), pages 11-21, July.
    7. Larry G Epstein & Yoram Halevy, 2024. "Hard-to-Interpret Signals," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 22(1), pages 393-427.
    8. Keyu Wu & Ernst Fehr & Sean Hofland & Martin Schonger, 2024. "On the Psychological Foundations of Ambiguity and Compound Risk Aversion," CESifo Working Paper Series 11150, CESifo.
    9. Chao Pang, 2022. "Construction and Analysis of Macroeconomic Forecasting Model Based on Biclustering Algorithm," Journal of Mathematics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2022(1).
    10. Anderson, Alyssa Gray, 2019. "Ambiguity in securitization markets," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 231-255.
    11. Ilke Aydogan & Loïc Berger & Valentina Bosetti, 2023. "Unraveling Ambiguity Aversion," Post-Print hal-04071242, HAL.
    12. repec:hal:wpaper:hal-04071242 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Konstantinos Georgalos, 2016. "Dynamic decision making under ambiguity," Working Papers 112111041, Lancaster University Management School, Economics Department.
    14. Stephen G. Dimmock & Roy Kouwenberg & Peter P. Wakker, 2016. "Ambiguity Attitudes in a Large Representative Sample," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(5), pages 1363-1380, May.
    15. Füllbrunn, Sascha & Rau, Holger A. & Weitzel, Utz, 2014. "Does ambiguity aversion survive in experimental asset markets?," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 107(PB), pages 810-826.
    16. John D. Hey & Yudistira Permana & Nuttaporn Rochanahastin, 2018. "When and how to satisfice: an experimental investigation," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Experiments in Economics Decision Making and Markets, chapter 5, pages 121-137, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    17. Konstantinos Georgalos, 2019. "An experimental test of the predictive power of dynamic ambiguity models," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 59(1), pages 51-83, August.
    18. Christian A. Vossler & Dong Yan, 2019. "An Experimental Investigation of Updating under Ambiguity," Working Papers 2019-02, University of Tennessee, Department of Economics.
    19. repec:esx:essedp:770 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Han, Leyla Jianyu & Kasa, Kenneth & Luo, Yulei, 2024. "Ambiguity, information processing, and financial intermediation," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    21. Armantier, Olivier & Treich, Nicolas, 2013. "Eliciting beliefs: Proper scoring rules, incentives, stakes and hedging," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 17-40.
    22. Mohammed Abdellaoui & Peter Klibanoff & Lætitia Placido, 2015. "Experiments on Compound Risk in Relation to Simple Risk and to Ambiguity," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 61(6), pages 1306-1322, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jjmath:v:2022:y:2022:i:1:n:9878815. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/1469 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.