IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jjmath/v2022y2022i1n2281202.html

Research on Forest Carbon Sequestration Based on FSC Model and DeepAR Algorithm

Author

Listed:
  • Yin-di Xu

Abstract

Forestry resources play an irreplaceable role in solving the problem of climate change. Forest managers to find a balance between carbon sinks and forest products, decisions must therefore take into account many aspects of forest value. This paper clarifies that forest carbon sequestration is mainly influenced by three aspects: human, climate, and nonclimatic physical factors, constructs a model for estimating the carbon sequestration rate of forest ecosystems based on forest age and the logistic growth equation, and combines human behaviour and climate influencing factors to make comprehensive corrections to the carbon sequestration rate of forest ecosystems per unit area. A model for calculating the carbon sequestration rate over time in a forest system was developed, which combined with the DeepAR Algorithm to obtain carbon sequestration. Then, this paper then assesses the various values of the forest, dividing the 25 factors affecting forest value assessment into five indices to establish a model of the forest ecosystem value assessment system for application to forest value assessment under different conditions. After determining the index system, we use the EWM‐CVM to integrate the indexes into the value index based on the forest ecosystem to propose a management plan. And the PSO‐BP algorithm is used to determine the transition point for forest management in order to optimise the ecological value of the forest.

Suggested Citation

  • Yin-di Xu, 2022. "Research on Forest Carbon Sequestration Based on FSC Model and DeepAR Algorithm," Journal of Mathematics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2022(1).
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jjmath:v:2022:y:2022:i:1:n:2281202
    DOI: 10.1155/2022/2281202
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2281202
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1155/2022/2281202?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gren, Ing-Marie & Zeleke, Abenezer Aklilu, 2016. "Policy design for forest carbon sequestration: A review of the literature," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 128-136.
    2. Stéphane S. Couture & Arnaud A. Reynaud, 2011. "Forest management under fire risk when forest carbon sequestration has value," Post-Print hal-02651317, HAL.
    3. Xiaowei Tong & Martin Brandt & Yuemin Yue & Philippe Ciais & Martin Rudbeck Jepsen & Josep Penuelas & Jean-Pierre Wigneron & Xiangming Xiao & Xiao-Peng Song & Stephanie Horion & Kjeld Rasmussen & Sass, 2020. "Forest management in southern China generates short term extensive carbon sequestration," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-10, December.
    4. Couture, Stéphane & Reynaud, Arnaud, 2011. "Forest management under fire risk when forest carbon sequestration has value," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(11), pages 2002-2011, September.
    5. Brent Sohngen & Robert Mendelsohn, 2003. "An Optimal Control Model of Forest Carbon Sequestration," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 85(2), pages 448-457.
    6. Kenneth Richards & Krister Andersson, 2001. "The leaky sink: persistent obstacles to a forest carbon sequestration program based on individual projects," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1(1), pages 41-54, March.
    7. Guo, Jinggang & Gong, Peichen, 2017. "The potential and cost of increasing forest carbon sequestration in Sweden," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(PB), pages 78-86.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gong, Peichen & Susaeta, Andres, 2025. "Is forest conservation a socially optimal strategy for increasing forest carbon sequestration?," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    2. Zhou, Mo, 2015. "Adapting sustainable forest management to climate policy uncertainty: A conceptual framework," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 66-74.
    3. Susaeta, Andres & Chang, Sun Joseph & Carter, Douglas R. & Lal, Pankaj, 2014. "Economics of carbon sequestration under fluctuating economic environment, forest management and technological changes: An application to forest stands in the southern United States," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 47-64.
    4. Ekholm, Tommi, 2020. "Optimal forest rotation under carbon pricing and forest damage risk," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    5. Isaac-Renton, M. & Moore, B. & Degner, J. & Bealle Statland, C. & Bogdanski, B. & Sun, L. & Stoehr, M., 2025. "Economic gain of genetically-selected coastal Douglas-fir: Timber, log and carbon value at varying planting densities," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    6. Tommi Ekholm, 2019. "Optimal forest rotation under carbon pricing and forest damage risk," Papers 1912.00269, arXiv.org.
    7. Luo, Li & Gao, Yuan & Regan, Courtney M. & Summers, David M. & Connor, Jeffery D. & O'Hehir, Jim & Meng, Li & Chow, Christopher W.K., 2024. "Emissions offset incentives, carbon storage and profit optimization for Australian timber plantations," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    8. Ekholm, Tommi, 2016. "Optimal forest rotation age under efficient climate change mitigation," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 62-68.
    9. Assmuth, Aino & Autto, Hilja & Halonen, Kirsi-Maria & Haltia, Emmi & Huttunen, Suvi & Lintunen, Jussi & Lonkila, Annika & Nieminen, Tiina M. & Ojanen, Paavo & Peltoniemi, Mikko & Pietilä, Kaisa & Pohj, 2024. "Forest carbon payments: A multidisciplinary review of policy options for promoting carbon storage in EU member states," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    10. Kim, Yeon-Su & Rodrigues, Marcos & Robinne, François-Nicolas, 2021. "Economic drivers of global fire activity: A critical review using the DPSIR framework," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    11. Nguyen, Trung Thanh & Nghiem, Nhung, 2016. "Optimal forest rotation for carbon sequestration and biodiversity conservation by farm income levels," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 185-194.
    12. Gren, Ing-Marie & Carlsson, Mattias & Elofsson, Katarina & Munnich, Miriam, 2012. "Stochastic carbon sinks for combating carbon dioxide emissions in the EU," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 1523-1531.
    13. G. Cornelis van Kooten & Tim Bogle & Frans P. de Vries, 2012. "Rent Seeking and the Smoke and Mirrors Game in the Creation of Forest Sector Carbon Credits: An Example from British Columbia," Working Papers 2012-06, University of Victoria, Department of Economics, Resource Economics and Policy Analysis Research Group.
    14. Anderson, Blake & M'Gonigle, Michael, 2012. "Does ecological economics have a future?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 37-48.
    15. Rossi, David J. & Baker, Justin S. & Abt, Robert C., 2023. "Quantifying additionality thresholds for forest carbon offsets in Mississippi pine pulpwood markets," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    16. Dumollard, Gaspard, 2018. "Multiple-stand forest management under fire risk: Analytical characterization of stationary rotation ages and optimal carbon sequestration policy," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 146-154.
    17. Hernandez, M. & Gómez, T. & Molina, J. & León, M.A. & Caballero, R., 2014. "Efficiency in forest management: A multiobjective harvest scheduling model," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 236-251.
    18. Lora Stoeva & Gabriella Szajko & Viktor Racz, 2026. "Assessing Forestry's Carbon Sink Potential in Bulgaria: A Comparative Study under Different Carbon Pricing Scenarios," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 1, pages 152-168.
    19. Parisa, Zack & Marland, Eric & Sohngen, Brent & Marland, Gregg & Jenkins, Jennifer, 2022. "The time value of carbon storage," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    20. Chu, Long & Grafton, R. Quentin & Nguyen, Hai, 2022. "A global analysis of the break-even prices to reduce atmospheric carbon dioxide via forest plantation and avoided deforestation," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jjmath:v:2022:y:2022:i:1:n:2281202. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/1469 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.