IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jforec/v44y2025i6p1993-2001.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Deep Learning Test of the Martingale Difference Hypothesis

Author

Listed:
  • João A. Bastos

Abstract

A deep learning binary classifier is proposed to test if asset returns follow martingale difference sequences. The Neyman–Pearson classification paradigm is applied to control the type I error of the test. In Monte Carlo simulations, I find that this approach has better power properties than variance ratio and portmanteau tests against several alternative processes. I apply this procedure to a large set of exchange rate returns and find that it detects several potential deviations from the martingale difference hypothesis that the conventional statistical tests fail to capture.

Suggested Citation

  • João A. Bastos, 2025. "A Deep Learning Test of the Martingale Difference Hypothesis," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(6), pages 1993-2001, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jforec:v:44:y:2025:i:6:p:1993-2001
    DOI: 10.1002/for.3280
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/for.3280
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/for.3280?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jforec:v:44:y:2025:i:6:p:1993-2001. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jhome/2966 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.