IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/isacfm/v30y2023i4p208-227.html

Cryptoassets: Definitions and accounting treatment under the current International Financial Reporting Standards framework

Author

Listed:
  • Luz Parrondo

Abstract

This paper provides a first comprehensive definition of cryptoassets for accounting purposes in the types of payment tokens, electronic money (e‐money) tokens, utility tokens and security tokens. The delivery of definitions for accounting purposes addresses some of the concerns raised by the European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG) discussion paper and helps accounting regulators adapt current International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) standards to blockchain‐based tokens' taxonomy and nature. The paper helps policymakers reconcile Markets in Cryptoassets Regulation Proposal's (MiCA) definitions and classification of cryptoassets with the EFRAG's specific needs for clarification and/or amendment in the IFRS standards and contributes to providing an accounting guide for practitioners in their financial disclosure.

Suggested Citation

  • Luz Parrondo, 2023. "Cryptoassets: Definitions and accounting treatment under the current International Financial Reporting Standards framework," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(4), pages 208-227, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:isacfm:v:30:y:2023:i:4:p:208-227
    DOI: 10.1002/isaf.1543
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/isaf.1543
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/isaf.1543?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Boon Seng Tan & Kin Yew Low, 2019. "Blockchain as the Database Engine in the Accounting System," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 29(2), pages 312-318, June.
    2. Auer, Raphael, 2019. "Embedded supervision: how to build regulation into blockchain finance," CEPR Discussion Papers 14095, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    3. Andrew B. Jackson & Steven Luu, 2023. "Accounting For Digital Assets," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 33(3), pages 302-312, September.
    4. Shuyu Zhang & Dunli Zhang & Jianming Zheng & Walter Aerts, 2021. "Does policy uncertainty of the blockchain dampen ICO markets?," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(S1), pages 1625-1637, April.
    5. Robert C Nickerson & Upkar Varshney & Jan Muntermann, 2013. "A method for taxonomy development and its application in information systems," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(3), pages 336-359, May.
    6. Benedetti, Hugo & Kostovetsky, Leonard, 2021. "Digital Tulips? Returns to investors in initial coin offerings," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zahid, Haider & Ali, Amjad & Audi, Marc, 2025. "Cryptocurrency Regulation and Financial Disclosure: Cross-Jurisdictional Evidence on Corporate Reporting Practices," MPRA Paper 127482, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Muneer M. Alshater & Mayank Joshipura & Rim El Khoury & Nohade Nasrallah, 2023. "Initial Coin Offerings: a Hybrid Empirical Review," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 61(3), pages 891-908, October.
    2. Conlon, Thomas & Corbet, Shaen & Oxley, Les, 2024. "The influence of European MiCa regulation on cryptocurrencies," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    3. Sangeeta Wats & Mahesh Joshi & Simarjeet Singh, 2024. "Initial coin offerings: current trends and future research directions," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 58(2), pages 1361-1387, April.
    4. Shih‐Chu Chou & Zhe‐An Li & Tawei Wang & Ju‐Chun Yen, 2023. "How the quality of initial coin offering white papers influences fundraising: Using security token offerings white papers as a benchmark," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(1), pages 3-18, January.
    5. Osakwe, Christian Nedu & Ogunmokun, Oluwatobi A. & Elgammal, Islam & Kwarteng, Michael Adu, 2025. "Individuals' attitudes and their adoption intentions of central bank digital currency: Combining theories and analytics for deeper insights," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    6. Thorsten Schoormann & Julia Schweihoff & Ilka Jussen & Frederik Möller, 2023. "Classification tools for business models: Status quo, comparison, and agenda," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-36, December.
    7. Maggie Wang, Yazhu & Matook, Sabine & Dennis, Alan R., 2024. "Unintended consequences of humanoid service robots: A case study of public service organizations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    8. Sascha Julian Oks & Max Jalowski & Michael Lechner & Stefan Mirschberger & Marion Merklein & Birgit Vogel-Heuser & Kathrin M. Möslein, 2024. "Cyber-Physical Systems in the Context of Industry 4.0: A Review, Categorization and Outlook," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 26(5), pages 1731-1772, October.
    9. Hadhri, Sinda & Younus, Mehak & Naeem, Muhammad Abubakr & Yarovaya, Larisa, 2025. "Listening to the Market: Music sentiment and cryptocurrency returns," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    10. Melina Panzner & Sebastian Enzberg & Maurice Meyer & Roman Dumitrescu, 2024. "Characterization of Usage Data with the Help of Data Classifications," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(1), pages 88-109, March.
    11. Maître, Arnaud T. & Pugachyov, Nikolay & Weigert, Florian, 2025. "Social media-based attention and the cross-section of cryptocurrency returns," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    12. Laura Marcus & Sebastian Johannes Schmid & Franziska Friedrich & Maximilian Röglinger & Philipp Grindemann, 2026. "Navigating the Landscape of Organizational Process Mining Setups," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 68(1), pages 137-158, February.
    13. Ströher, Tobias & Strüker, Jens & Konoval, Volodymyr, 2026. "From papers to power plants: A taxonomy of power flow tracing methods in research and practice," Bayreuth Reports on Information Systems Management 73, University of Bayreuth, Chair of Information Systems Management.
    14. Pastwa, Anna M. & Shrestha, Prabal & Thewissen, James & Torsin, Wouter, 2021. "Unpacking the black box of ICO white papers: a topic modeling approach," LIDAM Discussion Papers LFIN 2021018, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain Finance (LFIN).
    15. Stefan Vachkov & Nedyalko Valkanov, 2021. "Regulation, Competition and Partnership in the Financial Sector," Business & Management Compass, University of Economics Varna, issue 3, pages 259-276.
    16. Jongsub Lee & Tao Li & Donghwa Shin, 2022. "The Wisdom of Crowds in FinTech: Evidence from Initial Coin Offerings," The Review of Corporate Finance Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 11(1), pages 1-46.
    17. Anton Miglo, 2022. "Choice between IEO and ICO: Speed vs. Liquidity vs. Risk," FinTech, MDPI, vol. 1(3), pages 1-18, September.
    18. Jochen Wulf & Juerg Meierhofer, 2023. "Towards a Taxonomy of Large Language Model based Business Model Transformations," Papers 2311.05288, arXiv.org.
    19. Yaowen Shan & Sue Wright, 2023. "Contemporary Challenges: Spotlight on Climate, Cryptocurrencies and SME Practices," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 33(3), pages 229-229, September.
    20. Alexander Grünewald & Tan Gürpinar & Carina Culotta & Alicia Guderian, 2024. "Archetypes of blockchain-based business models in enterprise networks," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 633-665, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:isacfm:v:30:y:2023:i:4:p:208-227. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.interscience.wiley.com/jpages/1099-1174/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.