IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/ectrin/v34y2026i3p517-529.html

Supply‐Induced Litigation and the Role of Informal Institutions

Author

Listed:
  • Tingting Peng
  • Chun‐Yu Ho
  • Shaoqing Huang
  • Mingda Zhang

Abstract

Access to legal services is argued to be an integral part of inclusive growth. This paper examines how litigation demand responds to an increased supply of legal professionals, that is, supply‐induced litigation, in a developing economy using a newly constructed city‐level panel dataset of litigation rate, law firms and socioeconomic variables from China throughout 2013–23. Our empirical analysis reaches several conclusions. We find that an increase in the number of law firms has a positive and significant effect on the litigation rate, which supports supply‐induced litigation. This result is robust to the instrument variable (IV) estimation and several robustness checks. Further, we find that the supply‐induced litigation potentially attributes to a better matching between lawyers and clients. Finally, we find that supply‐induced litigation is more pronounced for cities with higher social trust. In other words, formal and informal institutions, such as social trust, are complementary in driving the use of the judicial system.

Suggested Citation

  • Tingting Peng & Chun‐Yu Ho & Shaoqing Huang & Mingda Zhang, 2026. "Supply‐Induced Litigation and the Role of Informal Institutions," Economics of Transition and Institutional Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(3), pages 517-529, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:ectrin:v:34:y:2026:i:3:p:517-529
    DOI: 10.1111/ecot.70028
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ecot.70028
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ecot.70028?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:ectrin:v:34:y:2026:i:3:p:517-529. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)2577-6983 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.