IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/corsem/v33y2026i2p2147-2159.html

Leveraging AI‐Based Analytics, Knowledge Acquisition, Opportunity Exploitation, and Circular Innovation for High‐Performance Circular Product Development

Author

Listed:
  • Chuanli Chen
  • Samina Riaz
  • Amena Sibghatullah
  • Kim Mee Chong
  • Pradeep Paraman A/. L. M. N. Paraman
  • Khurshid Khudoykulov

Abstract

The increasing pressure of sustainability and circular development of products remains a critical challenge for high‐tech SMEs in China. The research has advanced its knowledge by determining how AI‐based analytics, knowledge acquisition, opportunity exploitation, and circular innovation orientation drive circular product development performance. The study also examines these relationships under the influence of knowledge transfer and sustainable entrepreneurial orientation, which serve as mediators and moderators. The outcomes based on PLS‐SEM, reveal that factors such as AI‐based analytics, knowledge acquisition, opportunity exploitation, and circular innovation directly influence circular product development performance. The role of knowledge transfer indirectly appears to be substantial, suggesting its crucial role in circular performance. The findings also highlight that the addition of sustainable orientation as a moderator would amplify the circular performance outcomes. However. These outcomes highlight that not only organizational and technological resources are crucial, but also behavioral factors which are equally essential in the circular product life cycle. The considerations confirm that such performances stem from a resource‐based and knowledge‐based view, which are further shaped by circular innovations; hence, they should be treated as a critical lever of circular performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Chuanli Chen & Samina Riaz & Amena Sibghatullah & Kim Mee Chong & Pradeep Paraman A/. L. M. N. Paraman & Khurshid Khudoykulov, 2026. "Leveraging AI‐Based Analytics, Knowledge Acquisition, Opportunity Exploitation, and Circular Innovation for High‐Performance Circular Product Development," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(2), pages 2147-2159, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:33:y:2026:i:2:p:2147-2159
    DOI: 10.1002/csr.70269
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.70269
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/csr.70269?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Danny Miller, 1983. "The Correlates of Entrepreneurship in Three Types of Firms," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(7), pages 770-791, July.
    2. Genovese, Andrea & Acquaye, Adolf A. & Figueroa, Alejandro & Koh, S.C. Lenny, 2017. "Sustainable supply chain management and the transition towards a circular economy: Evidence and some applications," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 66(PB), pages 344-357.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Adrian Castro-Lopez & Montserrat Entrialgo & Ching T. Liao & María Leticia Santos-Vijande, 2025. "Towards circular economy through innovation: the role of entrepreneurial orientation and human resource management," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 1-35, December.
    2. S. Arunachalam & Sridhar N. Ramaswami & Pol Herrmann & Doug Walker, 2018. "Innovation pathway to profitability: the role of entrepreneurial orientation and marketing capabilities," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 46(4), pages 744-766, July.
    3. Henri A. Schildt & Markku V.J. Maula & Thomas Keil, 2005. "Explorative and Exploitative Learning from External Corporate Ventures," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 29(4), pages 493-515, July.
    4. Swen Nadkarni & Reinhard Prügl, 2021. "Digital transformation: a review, synthesis and opportunities for future research," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 71(2), pages 233-341, April.
    5. Shingo Yoshida & Hironori Yagi, 2021. "Long-Term Development of Urban Agriculture: Resilience and Sustainability of Farmers Facing the Covid-19 Pandemic in Japan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-23, April.
    6. Lu, Jinfeng & Dimov, Dimo, 2023. "A system dynamics modelling of entrepreneurship and growth within firms," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 38(3).
    7. Gundula Glowka & Andreas Kallmünzer & Anita Zehrer, 2021. "Enterprise risk management in small and medium family enterprises: the role of family involvement and CEO tenure," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 1213-1231, September.
    8. German Arana‐Landin & Waleska Sigüenza & Beñat Landeta‐Manzano & Iker Laskurain‐Iturbe, 2024. "Circular economy: On the road to ISO 59000 family of standards," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(3), pages 1977-2009, May.
    9. Chahal, Hardeep & Gupta, Mahesh & Lonial, Subhash & Raina, Swati, 2019. "Operational flexibility-entrepreneurial orientation relationship: Effects and consequences," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 154-167.
    10. Heira Georgina Valdez-Bocanegra & Gonzalo Maldonado-Guzmán & Carmen Castrejón-Mata, 2020. "The Entrepreneurial Orientation and its Impact on Competitiveness and Growth: Empirical Evidence in the State of Aguascalientes in Mexico," Advances in Management and Applied Economics, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 10(3), pages 1-6.
    11. Francisco Javier Forcadell & Fernando Úbeda, 2022. "Individual entrepreneurial orientation and performance: the mediating role of international entrepreneurship," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 875-900, June.
    12. Sumit Maheshwari & Chandra K. Jaggi & Prerna Gautam, 2026. "A state-of-the-art review of green supply chain management: observations and business insights," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 358(1), pages 193-273, March.
    13. Tomski Piotr, 2015. "Towards Family Entrepreneurial Orientation. The Construct, Dimensionality and Measurement," Journal of Intercultural Management, Sciendo, vol. 6(3), pages 123-142, September.
    14. Fabiola Baltar & Sonia de Coulon, 2014. "Dynamics Of The Entrepreneurial Process: The Innovative Entrepreneur And The Strategic Decisions," Review of Business and Finance Studies, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 5(1), pages 69-81.
    15. Diego Matricano & Mario Sorrentino, 2018. "Gender Equalities in Entrepreneurship: How Close, Or Far, Have We Come in Italy?," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(3), pages 1-75, February.
    16. Groza, Mark D. & Groza, Mya Pronschinske, 2018. "Salesperson regulatory knowledge and sales performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 37-46.
    17. Li, Mingxiang, 2021. "Exploring novel technologies through board interlocks: Spillover vs. broad exploration," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(9).
    18. Prosman, Ernst Johannes & Cagliano, Raffaella, 2022. "A contingency perspective on manufacturing configurations for the circular economy: Insights from successful start-ups," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    19. André de Abreu Saraiva Monteiro Alves & Fernando Manuel Pereira de Oliveira Carvalho, 2022. "How Dynamic Managerial Capabilities, Entrepreneurial Orientation, and Operational Capabilities Impact Microenterprises’ Global Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-23, December.
    20. Jacopo Zotti & Andrea Bigano, 2019. "Write circular economy, read economy’s circularity. How to avoid going in circles," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 36(2), pages 629-652, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:33:y:2026:i:2:p:2147-2159. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1535-3966 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.