IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/corsem/v32y2025i6p8338-8352.html

Sustainability Beyond Reporting? Unpacking the Intersections Between Impact Topics and Functions of Social Impact Assessment Models

Author

Listed:
  • Enrico Bellazzecca
  • Irene Bengo
  • Danny Casprini
  • Filippo Cavaliere
  • Elisa Ghilardi

Abstract

The growing importance of social impact in business has driven changes in organizational practices, with increased scrutiny on contributions to society and the environment through Social Impact Assessment (SIA). This paper examines 77 SIA models, focusing on two dimensions: the impacts they measure—social, environmental, and economic—and their roles in communication, management, and strategy. Using text analytics and qualitative content analysis, we identify recurring themes and categorize models by their emphasis on sustainability and functional use. While social impact is often prioritized, SIA models are primarily used for reporting and accountability, with limited integration into strategic decision‐making. This underutilization raises concerns about organizations' ability to achieve transformative change, as SIA tools are not consistently leveraged to embed sustainability into core strategies. The findings highlight the need to evolve SIA models to better align with long‐term sustainability goals.

Suggested Citation

  • Enrico Bellazzecca & Irene Bengo & Danny Casprini & Filippo Cavaliere & Elisa Ghilardi, 2025. "Sustainability Beyond Reporting? Unpacking the Intersections Between Impact Topics and Functions of Social Impact Assessment Models," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(6), pages 8338-8352, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:32:y:2025:i:6:p:8338-8352
    DOI: 10.1002/csr.70140
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.70140
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/csr.70140?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ester Clementino & Richard Perkins, 2021. "How Do Companies Respond to Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) ratings? Evidence from Italy," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 171(2), pages 379-397, June.
    2. William Alomoto & Angels Niñerola & Laia Pié, 2022. "Social Impact Assessment: A Systematic Review of Literature," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 161(1), pages 225-250, May.
    3. Hanan Alhaddi, 2015. "Triple Bottom Line and Sustainability: A Literature Review," Business and Management Studies, Redfame publishing, vol. 1(2), pages 6-10, September.
    4. Molecke, Greg & Pinkse, Jonatan, 2017. "Accountability for social impact: A bricolage perspective on impact measurement in social enterprises," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 32(5), pages 550-568.
    5. Birte Freudenreich & Florian Lüdeke-Freund & Stefan Schaltegger, 2020. "A Stakeholder Theory Perspective on Business Models: Value Creation for Sustainability," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 166(1), pages 3-18, September.
    6. Ericka Costa & Caterina Pesci, 2016. "Social impact measurement: why do stakeholders matter?," Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 7(1), pages 99-124, March.
    7. Nicholls, Alex, 2010. "Institutionalizing social entrepreneurship in regulatory space: Reporting and disclosure by community interest companies," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 394-415, May.
    8. Elisa Baraibar-Diez & Manuel Luna & María D. Odriozola & Ignacio Llorente, 2020. "Mapping Social Impact: A Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-20, November.
    9. Magali Delmas & Vered Doctori Blass, 2010. "Measuring corporate environmental performance: the trade‐offs of sustainability ratings," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 19(4), pages 245-260, May.
    10. Ericka Costa & Caterina Pesci, 2016. "Social impact measurement: why do stakeholders matter?," Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 7(1), pages 99-124, March.
    11. Nazim Hussain & Ugo Rigoni & René P. Orij, 2018. "Corporate Governance and Sustainability Performance: Analysis of Triple Bottom Line Performance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 149(2), pages 411-432, May.
    12. Hans Rawhouser & Michael Cummings & Scott L. Newbert, 2019. "Social Impact Measurement: Current Approaches and Future Directions for Social Entrepreneurship Research," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 43(1), pages 82-115, January.
    13. Luigi Corvo & Lavinia Pastore & Arianna Manti & Daniel Iannaci, 2021. "Mapping Social Impact Assessment Models: A Literature Overview for a Future Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-16, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Laura Berardi & Laurie Mook, 2023. "New digital technologies for social impact assessment: Considerations for Italian social economy organizations," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2023(2 Suppl.), pages 109-132.
    2. Olivier Boiral & Marie‐Christine Brotherton & Léo Rivaud & David Talbot, 2022. "Comparing the uncomparable? An investigation of car manufacturers' climate performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 2213-2229, July.
    3. Luigi Corvo & Lavinia Pastore & Arianna Manti & Daniel Iannaci, 2021. "Mapping Social Impact Assessment Models: A Literature Overview for a Future Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-16, April.
    4. Po‐Sheng Yang & Jin‐Li Hu, 2026. "Intersections Between Digital Innovation and Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence From Listed Electronics Companies in Taiwan," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(2), pages 2705-2736, March.
    5. Rawhouser, Hans & Symmes, Felipe & Argiolas, Alessia, 2025. "Everyday aesthetics and visual methods for enlarging our approach to social impact," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 24(C).
    6. Jimin Shim & Joonho Moon & Won Seok Lee & Namho Chung, 2021. "The Impact of CSR on Corporate Value of Restaurant Businesses Using Triple Bottom Line Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-14, February.
    7. Dario Cottafava & Francesco Marengo & Giuseppe Emiliano Di Martino & Laura Corazza, 2026. "From Impact Accounting to Accounting for the Loops: Activating Sustainable Communities for Climate Action," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(5), pages 7172-7195, July.
    8. Othmar Manfred Lehner & Alex Nicholls & Sarah Beatrice Kapplmüller, 2022. "Arenas of Contestation: A Senian Social Justice Perspective on the Nature of Materiality in Impact Measurement," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 179(4), pages 971-989, September.
    9. Annebeth Roor & Karen Maas, 2024. "Do impact investors live up to their promise? A systematic literature review on (im)proving investments' impacts," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 3707-3732, May.
    10. Guillaume Dumont, 2024. "Evaluating the Credibility of Entrepreneurs’ Impact Promises in Early-Stage Impact Investing," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 48(6), pages 1525-1555, November.
    11. E. A. Shvarts & A. I. Voropaev & A. V. Ptichnikov & A. S. Baibar, 2024. "Market-Oriented Mechanisms of Environmental Responsibility and Global Environmental Regulation," Regional Research of Russia, Springer, vol. 14(4), pages 608-623, December.
    12. Camélia Radu & Nadia Smaili, 2021. "Corporate performance patterns of Canadian listed firms: Balancing financial and corporate social responsibility outcomes," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(7), pages 3344-3359, November.
    13. Singaram, Raja & Radu-Lefebvre, Miruna & Gartner, William B., 2023. "Gordian knot uncut: Understanding the problem of founder exit in social ventures," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 19(C).
    14. Md. Fazla Mohiuddin & Ida Md. Yasin & Ahmed R. A. Latiff, 2023. "Knowledge base for social capital's role in scaling social impact: A bibliometric analysis," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(2), pages 742-772, April.
    15. Sarah Margaretha Jastram & Johanna Foersterling, 2024. "Clarifying ends in institutional decoupling theory: insights from social impact research," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 94(3), pages 501-523, April.
    16. Pradeep Kumar Hota, 2023. "Tracing the Intellectual Evolution of Social Entrepreneurship Research: Past Advances, Current Trends, and Future Directions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 182(3), pages 637-659, January.
    17. Driss El Kadiri Boutchich, 2023. "Model for Promoting Corporate Social Performance Measurement and Social Change: Elaboration from Causal Analysis Between the Both," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 169(1), pages 209-234, September.
    18. Noelia Franco-Leal & Rosalia Diaz-Carrion, 2022. "How financing and information drive international corporate entrepreneurs’ innovations," Journal of International Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 316-343, June.
    19. Angela Nativio, 2025. "Impact She Wrote: Genres of Narrative Accounting in the Cultural Sector," Working Papers 09, Venice School of Management - Department of Management, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia.
    20. Marcelo F. Cruz Jara & Jelena Spanjol, 2025. "Understanding Multiple Perspectives on Social Value in Business: An Integrative Review and Typology," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 198(2), pages 407-435, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:32:y:2025:i:6:p:8338-8352. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1535-3966 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.