IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/corsem/v32y2025i1p44-57.html

The impact of ownership structure on environmental performance in the G20 energy sector

Author

Listed:
  • Shaimaa Mursi Alghawwas
  • Noora Imad Aljabr

Abstract

The relationship between ownership structure and environmental performance has long been a subject of debate in the literature. This study investigates the effects of various ownership characteristics on environmental performance within the energy sector firms of G20 countries. We hypothesize that ownership concentration, as well as institutional, government, and foreign ownership, are significantly associated with firms' environmental performance. Using a dataset of energy sector companies from 2018 to 2022, collected from the Thomson Reuters Eikon database, we employ multiple linear regression analysis to test our hypotheses. The results reveal that foreign ownership is significantly and positively related to environmental performance. In contrast, institutional ownership has a significant negative effect on environmental performance. We also find that the developed G20 countries have a stronger influence on the overall sample results compared to the developing G20 countries. These findings contribute to the ongoing debate on the role of ownership structure in shaping corporate environmental practices, with important implications for policymakers, regulators, and energy companies operating within the G20 context.

Suggested Citation

  • Shaimaa Mursi Alghawwas & Noora Imad Aljabr, 2025. "The impact of ownership structure on environmental performance in the G20 energy sector," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(1), pages 44-57, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:32:y:2025:i:1:p:44-57
    DOI: 10.1002/csr.2941
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2941
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/csr.2941?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wenjing Li & Ran Zhang, 2010. "Corporate Social Responsibility, Ownership Structure, and Political Interference: Evidence from China," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 96(4), pages 631-645, November.
    2. Gianpaolo Iazzolino & Maria Elena Bruni & Stefania Veltri & Donato Morea & Giovanni Baldissarro, 2023. "The impact of ESG factors on financial efficiency: An empirical analysis for the selection of sustainable firm portfolios," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(4), pages 1917-1927, July.
    3. Valentina Lagasio & Nicola Cucari, 2019. "Corporate governance and environmental social governance disclosure: A meta‐analytical review," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(4), pages 701-711, July.
    4. repec:eme:jbsed0:jbsed-07-2021-0094 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Chunya Ren & Irene Wei Kiong Ting & Wen‐Min Lu & Qian Long Kweh, 2022. "Nonlinear effects of ESG on energy‐adjusted firm efficiency: Evidence from the stakeholder engagement of apple incorporated," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(5), pages 1231-1246, September.
    6. Hamzeh Al Amosh & Saleh F.A. Khatib, 2021. "Ownership structure and environmental, social and governance performance disclosure: the moderating role of the board independence," Journal of Business and Socio-economic Development, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 2(1), pages 49-66, August.
    7. Holderness, Clifford G. & Sheehan, Dennis P., 1988. "The role of majority shareholders in publicly held corporations : An exploratory analysis," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(1-2), pages 317-346, January.
    8. Helmi A. Boshnak, 2021. "Determinants of corporate social and environmental voluntary disclosure in Saudi listed firms," Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 20(3/4), pages 667-692, February.
    9. repec:eme:jaar00:jaar-05-2021-0141 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Luk Luk Fuadah & Mukhtaruddin Mukhtaruddin & Isni Andriana & Anton Arisman, 2022. "The Ownership Structure, and the Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Disclosure, Firm Value and Firm Performance: The Audit Committee as Moderating Variable," Economies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-16, December.
    11. Murya Habbash, 2016. "Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility disclosure: evidence from Saudi Arabia," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 12(4), pages 740-754, October.
    12. Shleifer, Andrei & Vishny, Robert W, 1997. "A Survey of Corporate Governance," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 52(2), pages 737-783, June.
    13. Won Oh & Young Chang & Aleksey Martynov, 2011. "The Effect of Ownership Structure on Corporate Social Responsibility: Empirical Evidence from Korea," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 104(2), pages 283-297, December.
    14. José Manuel Maside‐Sanfiz & Óscar Suárez Fernández & María‐Celia López‐Penabad & Mohammad Omar Alzghoul, 2024. "Does corporate social performance improve environmentally adjusted efficiency? Evidence from the energy sector," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(3), pages 1510-1530, May.
    15. Mohammed Abdullah Ammer & Meqbel Mishary Aliedan & Mansour Abdullah Alyahya, 2020. "Do Corporate Environmental Sustainability Practices Influence Firm Value? The Role of Independent Directors: Evidence from Saudi Arabia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-21, November.
    16. Jensen, Michael C. & Meckling, William H., 2008. "Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure," RAE - Revista de Administração de Empresas, FGV-EAESP Escola de Administração de Empresas de São Paulo (Brazil), vol. 48(2), April.
    17. Murya Habbash, 2016. "Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility disclosure: evidence from Saudi Arabia," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 12(4), pages 740-754, October.
    18. Timo Busch & Gunnar Friede, 2018. "The Robustness of the Corporate Social and Financial Performance Relation: A Second‐Order Meta‐Analysis," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(4), pages 583-608, July.
    19. Murya Habbash, 2016. "Corporate Governance And Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: Evidence From Saudi Arabia," Journal of Economic and Social Development, Clinical Journals Press, vol. 3(01), pages 01-17.
    20. Pedersen, Torben & Thomsen, Steen & Kvist, Hans Kurt, 2001. "The Direction of Causality Between Blockholder Ownership and Firm Value: US and EU Evidence," Working Papers 16-2001, Copenhagen Business School, Department of International Economics and Management.
    21. Yeh, Yin-Hua & Liao, Chen-Chieh, 2024. "Ownership structure and carbon emissions reduction," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    22. Lois Mahoney & Robin W. Roberts, 2007. "Corporate social performance, financial performance and institutional ownership in Canadian firms," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(3), pages 233-253, September.
    23. Anjali Kaimal & Shigufta Hena Uzma, 2024. "CSR and ownership structure: Moderating role of board characteristics in an emerging country context," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(5), pages 4933-4955, September.
    24. Jennifer Martínez-Ferrero & María-Belén Lozano, 2021. "The Nonlinear Relation between Institutional Ownership and Environmental, Social and Governance Performance in Emerging Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-16, February.
    25. Judith L. Walls & Pascual Berrone & Phillip H. Phan, 2012. "Corporate governance and environmental performance: is there really a link?," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(8), pages 885-913, August.
    26. Camélia Radu & Nadia Smaili & Adela Constantinescu, 2022. "The impact of the board of directors on corporate social performance: a multivariate approach," Journal of Applied Accounting Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 23(5), pages 1135-1156, February.
    27. Francesco Calza & Giorgia Profumo & Ilaria Tutore, 2013. "Does corporate ownership structure affect firms' environmental performance? Evidence in the European energy industry," International Journal of Globalisation and Small Business, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 5(1/2), pages 58-77.
    28. Lyton Chithambo & Ishmael Tingbani & Godfred Afrifa Agyapong & Ernest Gyapong & Isaac Sakyi Damoah, 2020. "Corporate voluntary greenhouse gas reporting: Stakeholder pressure and the mediating role of the chief executive officer," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(4), pages 1666-1683, May.
    29. McGuire, Jean & Dow, Sandra & Ibrahim, Bakr, 2012. "All in the family? Social performance and corporate governance in the family firm," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(11), pages 1643-1650.
    30. David P. Baron, 2009. "A Positive Theory of Moral Management, Social Pressure, and Corporate Social Performance," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(1), pages 7-43, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mohammad A. A. Zaid & Sara T. F. Abuhijleh & María Consuelo Pucheta‐Martínez, 2020. "Ownership structure, stakeholder engagement, and corporate social responsibility policies: The moderating effect of board independence," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(3), pages 1344-1360, May.
    2. Christian M. Faller & Dodo zu Knyphausen-Aufseß, 2018. "Does Equity Ownership Matter for Corporate Social Responsibility? A Literature Review of Theories and Recent Empirical Findings," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 150(1), pages 15-40, June.
    3. Ameen Qasem & Shaker Dahan AL-Duais & Wan Nordin Wan-Hussin & Hasan Mohamad Bamahros & Abdulsalam Alquhaif & Murad Thomran, 2022. "Institutional Ownership Types and ESG Reporting: The Case of Saudi Listed Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-23, September.
    4. Barbara Maggi & Rafaela Gjergji & Luigi Vena & Salvatore Sciascia & Alessandro Cortesi, 2023. "Family firm status and environmental disclosure: The moderating effect of board gender diversity," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(4), pages 1334-1351, October.
    5. Shamsuddeen Mamuda Ali & Muhammad Aminu Isa, 2018. "Firms Attributes and Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: A Literature Review," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 8(4), pages 312-324, April.
    6. Yusen Dong & Pengcheng Ma & Lanzhu Sun & Daniel Han Ming Chng, 2024. "Goodwill Hunting: Why and When Ultimate Controlling Owners Affect Their Firms’ Corporate Social Responsibility Performance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 193(3), pages 535-553, September.
    7. Aditya Pandu Wicaksono & Doddy Setiawan, 2024. "Impacts of stakeholder pressure on water disclosure within Asian mining companies," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 6493-6515, March.
    8. James J. Cordeiro & Giorgia Profumo & Ilaria Tutore, 2020. "Board gender diversity and corporate environmental performance: The moderating role of family and dual‐class majority ownership structures," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 1127-1144, March.
    9. Ali Meftah Gerged, 2021. "Factors affecting corporate environmental disclosure in emerging markets: The role of corporate governance structures," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 609-629, January.
    10. Asuman Erben Yavuz & Bade Ekim Kocaman & Mesut Doğan & Adalet Hazar & Şenol Babuşcu & Raikhan Sutbayeva, 2024. "The Impact of Corporate Governance on Sustainability Disclosures: A Comparison from the Perspective of Financial and Non-Financial Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-21, September.
    11. Musa Ghazwani & Rami Salem & Muhammad Usman & Ali T. Somaili, 2026. "Bridging Governance and Integrity: The Consequence of CSR Committee and Audit Committee Characteristics on Anti‐Corruption Disclosure in Saudi Arabia," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(2), pages 2128-2146, March.
    12. Sanja Pekovic & Sebastian Vogt, 2021. "The fit between corporate social responsibility and corporate governance: the impact on a firm’s financial performance," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 1095-1125, May.
    13. Othar Kordsachia & Maximilian Focke & Patrick Velte, 2022. "Do sustainable institutional investors contribute to firms’ environmental performance? Empirical evidence from Europe," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 16(5), pages 1409-1436, July.
    14. Francesco Gangi & Antonio Meles & Eugenio D'Angelo & Lucia Michela Daniele, 2019. "Sustainable development and corporate governance in the financial system: Are environmentally friendly banks less risky?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(3), pages 529-547, May.
    15. María del Mar Miras‐Rodríguez & Amalia Carrasco‐Gallego & Bernabé Escobar‐Pérez, 2015. "Are Socially Responsible Behaviors Paid Off Equally? A Cross‐cultural Analysis," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(4), pages 237-256, July.
    16. Franco Rubino & Francesco Napoli, 2020. "What Impact Does Corporate Governance Have on Corporate Environmental Performances? An Empirical Study of Italian Listed Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-21, July.
    17. Abdulaziz Ahmed Aljammaz & Suresh Ramakrishnan & Hamid Ghazi H. Sulimany & Saleh F.A. Khatib & Adnan Ali & Ehsan Almoataz & Abdulrhman Atllah Alharbi, 2025. "Mediating role of financial sustainability between board diversity and firms’ resilience: evidence from Saudi listed firms," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, December.
    18. Patrick Velte, 2023. "Which institutional investors drive corporate sustainability? A systematic literature review," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 42-71, January.
    19. Ebrahim Ahmed Ali Assakaf & Ameen Qasem & Sumaia Ayesh Qaderi & Mohammad Zaid Alaskar, 2025. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Intellectual Capital: The Moderating Role of Institutional Ownership in an Emerging Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-26, May.
    20. Ahmed A. Sarhan & Basil Al‐Najjar, 2023. "The influence of corporate governance and shareholding structure on corporate social responsibility: The key role of executive compensation," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(4), pages 4532-4556, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:32:y:2025:i:1:p:44-57. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1535-3966 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.