IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/corsem/v25y2018i6p1099-1107.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Organizational structure, slack resources and sustainable corporate socially responsible performance

Author

Listed:
  • Ying Zhang
  • Ji Li
  • Wanxing Jiang
  • Haomin Zhang
  • Yanghong Hu
  • Min Liu

Abstract

The current research on the slack–performance relationship pays attention mainly to a set of overlapping slack natures, such as being sticky or absorbed, without sufficient consideration of variables related to the internal structure of a given organization. We posit that this weakness may prevent us from further understanding how different slack resources (the slacks) influence firms' corporate socially responsible performance (CSR). Combining the resource‐based view of the firm with a perspective of international integration, we propose a new model explaining how structural‐related variables may interact with the slacks and influence firms' CSR. Analyzing data from publicly listed US firms (2002–2012), we obtain evidence supporting the importance of organizational integration structure for understanding the slack–performance relationship.

Suggested Citation

  • Ying Zhang & Ji Li & Wanxing Jiang & Haomin Zhang & Yanghong Hu & Min Liu, 2018. "Organizational structure, slack resources and sustainable corporate socially responsible performance," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(6), pages 1099-1107, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:25:y:2018:i:6:p:1099-1107
    DOI: 10.1002/csr.1524
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1524
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/csr.1524?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ikujiro Nonaka, 1994. "A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 5(1), pages 14-37, February.
    2. Valentina Marano & Peter Tashman & Tatiana Kostova, 2017. "Escaping the iron cage: Liabilities of origin and CSR reporting of emerging market multinational enterprises," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 48(3), pages 386-408, April.
    3. Yongqiang Gao & Jian Wu & Taïeb Hafsi, 2017. "The Inverted U‐Shaped Relationship between Corporate Philanthropy and Spending on Research and Development: A Case of Complementarity and Competition Moderated by Firm Size and Visibility," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(6), pages 465-477, November.
    4. Giacomo Boesso & Francesco Favotto & Giovanna Michelon, 2015. "Stakeholder Prioritization, Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility and Company Performance: Further Evidence," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(6), pages 424-440, November.
    5. Hausman, Jerry, 2015. "Specification tests in econometrics," Applied Econometrics, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), vol. 38(2), pages 112-134.
    6. Katarzyna Klimkiewicz & Victor Oltra, 2017. "Does CSR Enhance Employer Attractiveness? The Role of Millennial Job Seekers' Attitudes," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(5), pages 449-463, September.
    7. Alessandri, Todd M. & Pattit, Jason M., 2014. "Drivers of R&D investment: The interaction of behavioral theory and managerial incentives," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(2), pages 151-158.
    8. Umit Alniacik & Esra Alniacik & Nurullah Genc, 2011. "How corporate social responsibility information influences stakeholders' intentions," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(4), pages 234-245, July.
    9. David J. Collis, 1994. "Research Note: How Valuable are Organizational Capabilities?," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(S1), pages 143-152, December.
    10. David J. Collis, 1991. "A resource‐based analysis of global competition: The case of the bearings industry," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(S1), pages 49-68, June.
    11. Yuri Mishina & Timothy G. Pollock & Joseph F. Porac, 2004. "Are more resources always better for growth? Resource stickiness in market and product expansion," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(12), pages 1179-1197, December.
    12. José M. Agudo‐Valiente & Concepción Garcés‐Ayerbe & Manuel Salvador‐Figueras, 2015. "Corporate Social Performance and Stakeholder Dialogue Management," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(1), pages 13-31, January.
    13. Ritter, Thomas & Gemunden, Hans Georg, 2004. "The impact of a company's business strategy on its technological competence, network competence and innovation success," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 57(5), pages 548-556, May.
    14. Scott L. Newbert, 2008. "Value, rareness, competitive advantage, and performance: a conceptual‐level empirical investigation of the resource‐based view of the firm," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(7), pages 745-768, July.
    15. E. Geoffrey Love & Nitin Nohria, 2005. "Reducing slack: the performance consequences of downsizing by large industrial firms, 1977–93," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(12), pages 1087-1108, December.
    16. Giovanna Michelon & Giacomo Boesso & Kamalesh Kumar, 2013. "Examining the Link between Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility and Company Performance: An Analysis of the Best Corporate Citizens," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(2), pages 81-94, March.
    17. Matthew S. Kraatz & Edward J. Zajac, 2001. "How Organizational Resources Affect Strategic Change and Performance in Turbulent Environments: Theory and Evidence," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 12(5), pages 632-657, October.
    18. Amy J. Hillman & Gerald D. Keim, 2001. "Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: what's the bottom line?," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(2), pages 125-139, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kun Su, 2019. "Does religion benefit corporate social responsibility (CSR)? Evidence from China," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(6), pages 1206-1221, November.
    2. Yu‐Shan Chen & Xin Yan, 2022. "The small and medium enterprises' green human resource management and green transformational leadership: A sustainable moderated‐mediation practice," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(5), pages 1341-1356, September.
    3. Yi Zhao & Jegoo Lee, 2023. "How does board interlock network matter for sustainability? A social learning approach to corporate environmental performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(8), pages 5889-5908, December.
    4. Zhe Ouyang & Peng Cheng & Yang Liu & Ruiju Yang, 2020. "Institutional drivers for corporate philanthropic activities in China: Mediating roles of top management participation," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1), pages 244-255, January.
    5. Uyar, Ali & Lodh, Suman & Nandy, Monomita & Kuzey, Cemil & Karaman, Abdullah S., 2023. "Tradeoff between corporate investment and CSR: The moderating effect of financial slack, workforce slack, and board gender diversity," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    6. Dolores Gallardo-Vázquez & Luis Enrique Valdez-Juárez & José Luis Lizcano-Álvarez, 2019. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Intellectual Capital: Sources of Competitiveness and Legitimacy in Organizations’ Management Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-29, October.
    7. Jinliang Chen & Kangkang Yu & Jiaowei Gong, 2022. "Supply chain slack and sustainable development performance: The “fit–adjust” effect of objective and perceived environmental uncertainties," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(5), pages 1595-1604, September.
    8. Su-In Kim & Hyejeong Shin & Heejeong Shin & Sorah Park, 2019. "Organizational Slack, Corporate Social Responsibility, Sustainability, and Integrated Reporting: Evidence from Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-17, August.
    9. Blanco-González, Alicia & Cachón-Rodríguez, Gabriel & Hernández-Perlines, Felipe & Prado-Román, Camilo, 2023. "Effects of social responsibility on legitimacy and revisit intention: The moderating role of anxiety," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    10. Ying Zhang & Li Tong & Ji Li, 2020. "Minding the gap: Asymmetric effects of pay dispersion on stakeholder engagement in corporate environmental (Ir)responsibility," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(5), pages 2354-2367, September.
    11. Riha Dedi Priantana & Abdul Rohman & Fuad, 2020. "Attainment Discrepancy Level, Firm Resources Slack, and Sticky Cost," International Journal of Financial Research, International Journal of Financial Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 11(2), pages 97-110, April.
    12. del-Castillo-Feito, Cristina & Blanco-González, Alicia & Hernández-Perlines, Felipe, 2022. "The impacts of socially responsible human resources management on organizational legitimacy," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    13. Md. Abdul Kaium Masud & Md. Harun Ur Rashid & Tehmina Khan & Seong Mi Bae & Jong Dae Kim, 2019. "Organizational Strategy and Corporate Social Responsibility: The Mediating Effect of Triple Bottom Line," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-18, November.
    14. Marcela Rocha Haase Uhlig & Emerson Wagner Mainardes & Valcemiro Nossa, 2020. "Corporate social responsibility and consumer's relationship intention," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1), pages 313-324, January.
    15. Salome Zimmermann, 2019. "Same Same but Different: How and Why Banks Approach Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-20, April.
    16. Jesus Barrena‐Martinez & Macarena López‐Fernández & Pedro M. Romero‐Fernández, 2019. "The link between socially responsible human resource management and intellectual capital," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(1), pages 71-81, January.
    17. Alessandro Da Giau & Nicolai J. Foss & Andrea Furlan & Andrea Vinelli, 2020. "Sustainable development and dynamic capabilities in the fashion industry: A multi‐case study," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(3), pages 1509-1520, May.
    18. Shaista Wasiuzzaman & Ali Uyar & Cemil Kuzey & Abdullah S. Karaman, 2022. "Corporate social responsibility: Is it a matter of slack financial resources or strategy or both?," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(6), pages 2444-2466, September.
    19. Muazza Muazza & Akhmad Habibi & Amirul Mukminin, 2023. "The Socially Responsible Human Resources Management and Its Impacts on the Organizational Legitimacy: The Case of Indonesian Employees," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 3, pages 162-177.
    20. Lee Siew Peng & Mansor Isa, 2020. "Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Practices And Performance In Shariah Firms: Agency or Stakeholder Theory?," Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance (AAMJAF), Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia, vol. 16(1), pages 1-34.
    21. Luca Marrucci & Tiberio Daddi & Fabio Iraldo, 2023. "Institutional and stakeholder pressures on organisational performance and green human resources management," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(1), pages 324-341, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ji Li & Ying Zhang & Yanghong Hu & Xiaolong Tao & Wanxing Jiang & Lei Qi, 2018. "Developed market or developing market?: A perspective of institutional theory on multinational enterprises’ diversification and sustainable development with environmental protection," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(7), pages 858-871, November.
    2. Lorenzo Dal Maso & Giovanni Liberatore & Francesco Mazzi, 2017. "Value Relevance of Stakeholder Engagement: The Influence of National Culture," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(1), pages 44-56, January.
    3. Ciprian Stan & Mike Peng & Garry Bruton, 2014. "Slack and the performance of state-owned enterprises," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 31(2), pages 473-495, June.
    4. Shao‐Chi Chang & Heng‐Yu Chang, 2015. "Corporate Motivations of Product Recall Strategy: Exploring the Role of Corporate Social Responsibility in Stakeholder Engagement," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(6), pages 393-407, November.
    5. Wioleta Kucharska & Rafał Kowalczyk, 2019. "How to achieve sustainability?—Employee's point of view on company's culture and CSR practice," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(2), pages 453-467, March.
    6. Pablo Gomez‐Carrasco & Giovanna Michelon, 2017. "The Power of Stakeholders' Voice: The Effects of Social Media Activism on Stock Markets," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(6), pages 855-872, September.
    7. Wójcik Piotr, 2018. "The business case for corporate social responsibility: A literature overview and integrative framework," Journal of Management and Business Administration. Central Europe, Sciendo, vol. 26(1), pages 121-148, March.
    8. Kull, Alexander J. & Mena, Jeannette A. & Korschun, Daniel, 2016. "A resource-based view of stakeholder marketing," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(12), pages 5553-5560.
    9. Michael Greiner & Jing Sun, 2021. "How corporate social responsibility can incentivize top managers: A commitment to sustainability as an agency intervention," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(4), pages 1360-1375, July.
    10. Sanja Pekovic & Marcus Wagner & Sebastian Vogt, 2022. "Differential effects of corporate social responsibility on downsizing: Evidence from the United States," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(4), pages 1021-1033, July.
    11. Shahzad, Ali M. & Mousa, Fariss T. & Sharfman, Mark P., 2016. "The implications of slack heterogeneity for the slack-resources and corporate social performance relationship," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(12), pages 5964-5971.
    12. Javier Aguilera-Caracuel & Jaime Guerrero-Villegas & María Dolores Vidal-Salazar & Blanca L. Delgado-Márquez, 2015. "International Cultural Diversification and Corporate Social Performance in Multinational Enterprises: The Role of Slack Financial Resources," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 55(3), pages 323-353, June.
    13. Altaf, Nufazil & Shah, Farooq, 2017. "Slack heterogeneity and firm performance: Investigating the relationship in Indian context," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 390-403.
    14. Du, Yunzhou & Kim, Phillip H. & Fourné, Sebastian P.L. & Wang, Xiaowei, 2022. "In times of plenty: Slack resources, R&D investment, and entrepreneurial firms in challenging institutional environments," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 360-376.
    15. Khawaja Fawad Latif & Aymen Sajjad, 2018. "Measuring corporate social responsibility: A critical review of survey instruments," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(6), pages 1174-1197, November.
    16. Tabesh, Pooya & Vera, Dusya & Keller, Robert T., 2019. "Unabsorbed slack resource deployment and exploratory and exploitative innovation: How much does CEO expertise matter?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 65-80.
    17. Marlin, Dan & Geiger, Scott W., 2015. "A reexamination of the organizational slack and innovation relationship," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(12), pages 2683-2690.
    18. Mario Vaupel & David Bendig & Denise Fischer-Kreer & Malte Brettel, 2023. "The Role of Share Repurchases for Firms’ Social and Environmental Sustainability," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 183(2), pages 401-428, March.
    19. Malen, Joel, 2015. "Motivating And Enabling Firm Innovation Effort: Integrating Penrosian And Behavioral Theory Perspectives On Slack Resources," Hitotsubashi Journal of commerce and management, Hitotsubashi University, vol. 49(1), pages 37-54, October.
    20. Grougiou, Vassiliki & Leventis, Stergios & Dedoulis, Emmanouil & Owusu-Ansah, Stephen, 2014. "Corporate social responsibility and earnings management in U.S. banks," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 155-169.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:25:y:2018:i:6:p:1099-1107. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1535-3966 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.