IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/complx/v2022y2022i1n5879010.html

Directing the Diffusion of Public Opinions in Incidents with Not‐in‐My‐Back‐Yard Projects: An Evolutionary Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaofeng Liu
  • Xiaoling Wu
  • Yumin Qiu
  • Shuping Cheng

Abstract

How should the public administrative department direct the diffusion of public opinions in a not‐in‐my‐backyard (NIMBY) crisis? This paper first analyzes the macroevolutionary characteristics of the public opinion associated with a NIMBY crisis. We then examine the perceptive interactions among individuals towards NIMBY projects from a microscopic perspective and develop an evolutionary game model (i.e., replicator dynamics) to describe the interactions among individuals. We also use information entropy and dynamic equations to construct an interaction entropy model and a dynamic equation to capture administrative‐department‐led public opinion. Through examining the existence and stability of the evolutionary equilibrium of these models, we analyze the evolution of NIMBY public opinion.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:wly:complx:v:2022:y:2022:i:1:n:5879010
DOI: 10.1155/2022/5879010
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5879010
Download Restriction: no

File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1155/2022/5879010?utm_source=ideas
LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:complx:v:2022:y:2022:i:1:n:5879010. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/8503 .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.