IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/complx/v2022y2022i1n2555182.html

High‐Tech Industrial Agglomeration and Urban Innovation in China’s Yangtze River Delta Urban Agglomeration: From the Perspective of Industrial Structure Optimization and Industrial Attributes

Author

Listed:
  • Dan Xu
  • Bo Yu
  • Lina Liang

Abstract

What is the interplay of high‐tech industrial agglomeration and urban innovation? How does high‐tech industrial agglomeration affect urban innovation? What are the heterogeneous effects of high‐tech industry agglomeration on urban innovation in different conditions? To answer these questions, this paper analyzes the interrelationship between high‐tech industry agglomeration and urban innovation based on panel data of China’s Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration from 2010 to 2019. We discuss the influence mechanism of high‐tech industrial agglomeration on urban innovation by exploring the mediating effect of industrial structure optimization and the threshold effect of industrial attributes. The heterogeneous impact of high‐tech industry agglomeration on urban innovation is also been further studied. We find that (1) the interaction relationship between high‐tech industry agglomeration and urban innovation output is positive. (2) The advancement of industrial structure plays a positive intermediary role between high‐tech industrial agglomeration and urban innovation output, while the rationalization of industrial structure shows a suppressing effect. (3) There are different threshold effects between capital intensity and technology intensity. The influence of high‐tech agglomeration on urban innovation is positive only when the capital intensity exceeds 1.125. However, the influence is always positive in different levels of technology intensity, significantly. When the technology intensity is higher than 9.012E − 06, the degree and significance of this positive impact would decrease. (4) There are heterogeneous impacts of high‐tech industry agglomeration on urban innovation output in the Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration in different time stages, urban innovation development stages, and urban circles.

Suggested Citation

  • Dan Xu & Bo Yu & Lina Liang, 2022. "High‐Tech Industrial Agglomeration and Urban Innovation in China’s Yangtze River Delta Urban Agglomeration: From the Perspective of Industrial Structure Optimization and Industrial Attributes," Complexity, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2022(1).
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:complx:v:2022:y:2022:i:1:n:2555182
    DOI: 10.1155/2022/2555182
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2555182
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1155/2022/2555182?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael Porter, 2003. "The Economic Performance of Regions," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(6-7), pages 549-578.
    2. Zhi Li & Chengri Ding & Yi Niu, 2019. "Industrial structure and urban agglomeration: evidence from Chinese cities," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 63(1), pages 191-218, August.
    3. Yong Hu & Jiaochen Liang, 2018. "Related variety and industrial growth: evidence from U.S. commuting zones," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(21), pages 1512-1516, December.
    4. Ciccone, Antonio, 2002. "Agglomeration effects in Europe," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 213-227, February.
    5. Feldman, Maryann P. & Audretsch, David B., 1999. "Innovation in cities:: Science-based diversity, specialization and localized competition," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 409-429, February.
    6. Ning, Lutao & Wang, Fan & Li, Jian, 2016. "Urban innovation, regional externalities of foreign direct investment and industrial agglomeration: Evidence from Chinese cities," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(4), pages 830-843.
    7. Niccolò Innocenti & Francesco Capone & Luciana Lazzeretti, 2020. "Knowledge networks and industrial structure for regional innovation: An analysis of patents collaborations in Italy," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 99(1), pages 55-72, February.
    8. Ekaterina Turkina & Boris Oreshkin & Raja Kali, 2019. "Regional innovation clusters and firm innovation performance: an interactionist approach," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(8), pages 1193-1206, August.
    9. Zvi Griliches, 1998. "Issues in Assessing the Contribution of Research and Development to Productivity Growth," NBER Chapters, in: R&D and Productivity: The Econometric Evidence, pages 17-45, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    10. Bo Kyeong Lee & So Young Sohn, 2019. "Disparities in exploitative and exploratory patenting performance across regions: Focusing on the roles of agglomeration externalities," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 98(1), pages 241-263, February.
    11. Zoltan J. Acs & Luc Anselin & Attila Varga, 2008. "Patents and Innovation Counts as Measures of Regional Production of New Knowledge," Chapters, in: Entrepreneurship, Growth and Public Policy, chapter 11, pages 135-151, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    12. George, Gerard & Zahra, Shaker A. & Wood, D. Jr., 2002. "The effects of business-university alliances on innovative output and financial performance: a study of publicly traded biotechnology companies," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 17(6), pages 577-609, October.
    13. Rafael Boix & Vittorio Galletto, 2009. "Innovation and Industrial Districts: A First Approach to the Measurement and Determinants of the I-District Effect," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(9), pages 1117-1133.
    14. Josef Zweimüller & Johann K. Brunner, 2005. "Innovation And Growth With Rich And Poor Consumers," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(2), pages 233-262, May.
    15. David Gibson & Michael Oden, 2019. "The launch and evolution of a technology‐based economy: The case of Austin Texas," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(3), pages 947-968, September.
    16. Baptista, Rui & Swann, Peter, 1998. "Do firms in clusters innovate more?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 27(5), pages 525-540, September.
    17. Krugman, Paul, 1991. "Increasing Returns and Economic Geography," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 99(3), pages 483-499, June.
    18. Liang, Jiaochen & Goetz, Stephan J., 2018. "Technology intensity and agglomeration economies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(10), pages 1990-1995.
    19. David L. Rigby & W. Mark Brown, 2015. "Who Benefits from Agglomeration?," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(1), pages 28-43, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nana Yang & Qiming Liu, 2023. "How does industrial agglomeration affect regional innovation? A spatial econometric analysis," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(4), pages 826-852, December.
    2. Richard Briesch & Ernan Haruvy & Glenn B. Voss & Zannie Giraud Voss, 2024. "The countervailing effects of spatial competition in the performing arts: examining local versus traded market performance," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 48(4), pages 527-574, December.
    3. Tappeiner, Gottfried & Hauser, Christoph & Walde, Janette, 2008. "Regional knowledge spillovers: Fact or artifact?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(5), pages 861-874, June.
    4. Li, Junwei & Liu, Wenxiao & Du, Lei & Xiao, Jin, 2024. "High-tech industry agglomeration and regional green development: An analysis of spatial Durbin model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    5. Delgado, Mercedes & Porter, Michael E. & Stern, Scott, 2014. "Clusters, convergence, and economic performance," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(10), pages 1785-1799.
    6. Feldman, Maryann P. & Kogler, Dieter F., 2010. "Stylized Facts in the Geography of Innovation," Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, in: Bronwyn H. Hall & Nathan Rosenberg (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 0, pages 381-410, Elsevier.
    7. Yuandi Wang & Lutao Ning & Jian Li & Martha Prevezer, 2016. "Foreign Direct Investment Spillovers and the Geography of Innovation in Chinese Regions: The Role of Regional Industrial Specialization and Diversity," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(5), pages 805-822, May.
    8. Niccolò Ghio & Massimiliano Guerini & Erik Lehmann & Cristina Rossi-Lamastra, 2015. "The emergence of the knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 44(1), pages 1-18, January.
    9. Jiwu Wang & Nina Liu & Yichen Ruan, 2020. "Influence Factors of Spatial Distribution of Urban Innovation Activities Based on Ensemble Learning: A Case Study in Hangzhou, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-19, January.
    10. Tomas del Barrio Castro & Jose Andres Garcia Quevedo, 2004. "The geography of innovation: the effects of university research," Working Papers in Economics 120, Universitat de Barcelona. Espai de Recerca en Economia.
    11. Li Fang, 2019. "Manufacturing Clusters and Firm Innovation," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 33(1), pages 6-18, February.
    12. Kleoniki Kalapouti & Konstantinos Petridis & Chrisovalantis Malesios & Prasanta Kumar Dey, 2020. "Measuring efficiency of innovation using combined Data Envelopment Analysis and Structural Equation Modeling: empirical study in EU regions," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 294(1), pages 297-320, November.
    13. Michael Fritsch & Viktor Slavtchev, 2010. "How does industry specialization affect the efficiency of regional innovation systems?," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 45(1), pages 87-108, August.
    14. Rui Baptista & Joana Mendonça, 2010. "Proximity to knowledge sources and the location of knowledge-based start-ups," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 45(1), pages 5-29, August.
    15. Liang, Jiaochen & Goetz, Stephan J., 2018. "Technology intensity and agglomeration economies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(10), pages 1990-1995.
    16. Rosalia Castellano & Gaetano Musella & Gennaro Punzo, 2024. "How Do Agglomeration Externalities and Workforce Skills Drive Innovation? Empirical Evidence from Italy," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(2), pages 6737-6760, June.
    17. Christ, Julian P., 2009. "The geography and co-location of European technology-specific co-inventorship networks," Violette Reihe: Schriftenreihe des Promotionsschwerpunkts "Globalisierung und Beschäftigung" 31/2010, University of Hohenheim, Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, Evangelisches Studienwerk.
    18. Qin, Xionghe & Wang, Xueli & Kwan, Mei-Po, 2023. "The contrasting effects of interregional networks and local agglomeration on R&D productivity in Chinese provinces: Insights from an empirical spatial Durbin model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    19. Taelim Choi & Jeong-Il Park, 2020. "Related variety and productivity in the environmental industry: establishment-level evidence from South Korea," Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 287-295, December.
    20. Stefano Usai, 2011. "The Geography of Inventive Activity in OECD Regions," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(6), pages 711-731.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:complx:v:2022:y:2022:i:1:n:2555182. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/8503 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.