IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/buseth/v35y2026i1p215-230.html

Corporate Foundations' Governance Mechanisms as a Tool for Stakeholder Engagement

Author

Listed:
  • Nathalie Touratier‐Muller
  • Anna Cournac

Abstract

Although governance and stakeholder practices have been widely researched in both the private and public sectors, governance still remains a fuzzy concept when it comes to corporate foundations (CFs). The latter target social creation, fulfilling societal needs and expectations. Using a multiple case study design in respect of 16 French CFs, this qualitative research contributes to the theoretical discussion around stakeholder engagement, examining how governance processes are implemented. Our results point out that involving the foundation's stakeholders is a roundabout way to engage in dialogue with and involve the company's stakeholders. New relationships and value propositions are then developed that have nothing to do with the company's core competencies. This study makes a major contribution to the CF' governance field by highlighting an imbalance between the impact of internal and external stakeholders, with an overinvestment of internal staff (employees and managers). The governance mechanisms are based on a three‐stage process (project submission, selection phase and final approval), in which external stakeholder involvement is limited. Finally, the analysis identifies that upward accountability practices are put in place (mainly toward the company), while horizontal accountability is respected but not publicly disclosed.

Suggested Citation

  • Nathalie Touratier‐Muller & Anna Cournac, 2026. "Corporate Foundations' Governance Mechanisms as a Tool for Stakeholder Engagement," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 35(1), pages 215-230, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:buseth:v:35:y:2026:i:1:p:215-230
    DOI: 10.1111/beer.12784
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12784
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/beer.12784?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dawkins, Cedric, 2015. "Agonistic Pluralism and Stakeholder Engagement," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 25(1), pages 1-28, January.
    2. Michelle Greenwood, 2007. "Stakeholder Engagement: Beyond the Myth of Corporate Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 74(4), pages 315-327, September.
    3. Birte Freudenreich & Florian Lüdeke-Freund & Stefan Schaltegger, 2020. "A Stakeholder Theory Perspective on Business Models: Value Creation for Sustainability," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 166(1), pages 3-18, September.
    4. Simone De Colle, 2005. "A stakeholder management model for ethical decision making," International Journal of Management and Decision Making, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 6(3/4), pages 299-314.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Francesca Iandolo & Antonio La Sala & Lorenzo Turriziani & Francesco Caputo, 2025. "Stakeholder engagement in managing systemic risk management," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(4), pages 1069-1085, October.
    2. Marco Valerio Rossi & Pasquale Sasso & Andrea Perna & Ludovico Solima, 2025. "Engaging marginal stakeholders on social networking sites. A cross‐country exploratory analysis among Generation Z consumers," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(1), pages 155-173, January.
    3. Watson, Rosina & Wilson, Hugh N. & Macdonald, Emma K., 2020. "Business-nonprofit engagement in sustainability-oriented innovation: What works for whom and why?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 87-98.
    4. Fabien Martinez, 2023. "Exploring the syncretic dynamics involved in dyadic business–NGO partnerships," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(7), pages 4068-4083, November.
    5. Sara Moggi & Fabietti Giacomo & Isonni Elisa, 2025. "Enhancing value creation through stakeholder engagement in sustainable mega‐events: The case of Expo 2020 Dubai legacy," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(4), pages 1928-1941, October.
    6. Damiano Cortese & Chiara Civera & Cecilia Casalegno & Alessandro Zardini, 2024. "Transformative social innovation in developing and emerging ecosystems: a configurational examination," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 827-857, March.
    7. Xueting Jiang & Bogdan Prokopovych & Garett DiStefano, 2022. "Leveraging A Lenient Category in Practicing Responsible Leadership: A Case Study," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 181(2), pages 413-425, November.
    8. Renata Konadu & Gabriel Sam Ahinful & Samuel Owusu-Agyei, 2021. "Corporate governance pillars and business sustainability: does stakeholder engagement matter?," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 18(3), pages 269-289, September.
    9. Lea Fobbe & Camilla Niss & Per Hilletofth, 2024. "Continuous and changing stakeholder engagement for organisational sustainability: Proposing the stakeholder engagement flow model," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(6), pages 6061-6074, November.
    10. Lara Bianchi & Robert Caruana & Alysha Kate Shivji, 2025. "Engaging Marginalized Stakeholders: Towards a Dialogical Theorization of Effective Corporate-Rightsholder Remedy," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 201(3), pages 605-619, October.
    11. Veronica, Scuotto & Alexeis, Garcia-Perez & Valentina, Cillo & Elisa, Giacosa, 2020. "Do stakeholder capabilities promote sustainable business innovation in small and medium-sized enterprises? Evidence from Italy," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 131-141.
    12. Siebold, Nicole & Oelrich, Sebastian & Roche, Olivier P., 2023. "“I Am Your Partner, Am I Not?” An inquiry into stakeholder inclusion in platform organizations in times of crisis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    13. Tahir Alshukri & Opeoluwa Seun Ojekemi & Tolga Öz & Ahmad Alzubi, 2024. "The Interplay of Corporate Social Responsibility, Innovation Capability, Organizational Learning, and Sustainable Value Creation: Does Stakeholder Engagement Matter?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-30, June.
    14. Piera Buonincontri & Roberto Micera & Ornella Papaluca, 2025. "A technology‐enabled framework for stakeholder engagement in a destination management system: Evidence from DMS Puglia," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(4), pages 1561-1575, October.
    15. Izabela Delabre & Joss Lyons‐White & Clara Melot & Eirik Ingwardo Veggeberg & Anthony Alexander & Martin C. Schleper & Robert M. Ewers & Andrew T. Knight, 2023. "Should I stay or should I go? Understanding stakeholder dis/engagement for deforestation‐free palm oil," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(8), pages 5128-5145, December.
    16. Veldhuizen, Caroline & Desouza, Kevin C. & Bandara, Wasana & Chang, Artemis, 2022. "How much is not enough: Corporate social responsibility and beyond in the resources sector," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    17. Minna Saunila & Juhani Ukko & Jorma Kinnunen, 2024. "Sustainability partnership as a moderator in the relationship between business sustainability and firm competitiveness," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 123-133, February.
    18. Civera, Chiara & Casalegno, Cecilia & Morelli, Brigida & Santoro, Gabriele, 2026. "Seeds of change: Unpacking the enduring effects of MNC knowledge transfer in autonomous social innovation projects by fringe stakeholders," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    19. Chiara Civera & Sara Moggi & Valentina Chiaudano & Edward R. Freeman, 2025. "Stakeholder Relationships in the Circular Economy. Conceptualizing Relational Approaches Through Systematic Literature Review," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(8), pages 10698-10722, December.
    20. Yoo Na Youm & Jennifer J. Griffin & Andrew Bryant, 2025. "An exploration of cooperative stakeholder engagement and risk‐taking behavior in privately held family firms," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(4), pages 1576-1591, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:buseth:v:35:y:2026:i:1:p:215-230. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/26946424 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.