IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/buseth/v34y2025i4p1561-1575.html

A technology‐enabled framework for stakeholder engagement in a destination management system: Evidence from DMS Puglia

Author

Listed:
  • Piera Buonincontri
  • Roberto Micera
  • Ornella Papaluca

Abstract

In tourism, the presence of different stakeholders, sometimes with conflicting interests, requires a clear understanding of how to manage and engage them effectively. Despite the importance of this topic, tourism studies lack a univocal framework for destinations aiming to develop a destination management system (DMS) focused on empowering stakeholder engagement. To fill this gap, this study aims to identify the key dimensions that can strengthen stakeholder engagement in the tourism sector. Particular attention is given to the role of technology in mediating relationships among DMS participants and to the role of ‘intermediary’ stakeholders in facilitating collaboration and engagement. By adopting a cross‐disciplinary approach that integrates stakeholder theory, stakeholder engagement and destination management, and by examining a case study of an Italian best practice, DMS Puglia, a technology‐enabled framework for stakeholder engagement in a DMS was elaborated. This study contributes to the advancement of the literature on stakeholder engagement in tourism by demonstrating that the structure and composition of a DMS, and the communication methods it enables, along with the role of the destination management organisation and the preparedness of stakeholders to participate in a DMS, significantly influence stakeholder engagement and can strengthen relationships among participants in a technologically advanced tourism system. This study also provides directions to stakeholder bridges about how to effectively improve stakeholder engagement through technology‐focused tools and strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Piera Buonincontri & Roberto Micera & Ornella Papaluca, 2025. "A technology‐enabled framework for stakeholder engagement in a destination management system: Evidence from DMS Puglia," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(4), pages 1561-1575, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:buseth:v:34:y:2025:i:4:p:1561-1575
    DOI: 10.1111/beer.12729
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12729
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/beer.12729?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dennis A. Gioia & Kumar Chittipeddi, 1991. "Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(6), pages 433-448, September.
    2. Michelle Greenwood, 2007. "Stakeholder Engagement: Beyond the Myth of Corporate Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 74(4), pages 315-327, September.
    3. Thorsten Roser & Ksenija Kuzmina & Mikko Koria, 2023. "Enabling Sustainable Adaptation and Transitions: Exploring New Roles of a Tourism Innovation Intermediary in Andalusia, Spain," Tourism and Hospitality, MDPI, vol. 4(3), pages 1-16, June.
    4. Thomas Maak, 2007. "Responsible Leadership, Stakeholder Engagement, and the Emergence of Social Capital," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 74(4), pages 329-343, September.
    5. Abigail Oxley Green & Lynsey Hunton‐Clarke, 2003. "A typology of stakeholder participation for company environmental decision‐making," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(5), pages 292-299, September.
    6. Ma, Li-Ching & Li, Han-Lin, 2008. "A fuzzy ranking method with range reduction techniques," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 184(3), pages 1032-1043, February.
    7. Tiina Onkila, 2011. "Multiple forms of stakeholder interaction in environmental management: business arguments regarding differences in stakeholder relationships," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(6), pages 379-393, September.
    8. Freeman, Edward & Liedtka, Jeanne, 1997. "Stakeholder capitalism and the value chain," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 15(3), pages 286-296, June.
    9. Xiang, Zheng & Gretzel, Ulrike, 2010. "Role of social media in online travel information search," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 179-188.
    10. Elisabet Garriga, 2014. "Beyond Stakeholder Utility Function: Stakeholder Capability in the Value Creation Process," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 120(4), pages 489-507, April.
    11. ., 2008. "Historical Data and Methods," Chapters, in: Heat, Power and Light, chapter 3, pages 28-42, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    12. Shane Feyers & Taylor Stein & Kotryna Klizentyte, 2019. "Bridging Worlds: Utilizing a Multi-Stakeholder Framework to Create Extension–Tourism Partnerships," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-23, December.
    13. Stephanie Hays & Stephen Page & Dimitrios Buhalis, 2013. "Social media as a destination marketing tool: its use by national tourism organisations," Current Issues in Tourism, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(3), pages 211-239.
    14. Waligo, Victoria M. & Clarke, Jackie & Hawkins, Rebecca, 2013. "Implementing sustainable tourism: A multi-stakeholder involvement management framework," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 342-353.
    15. Simone De Colle, 2005. "A stakeholder management model for ethical decision making," International Journal of Management and Decision Making, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 6(3/4), pages 299-314.
    16. Kloczko-Gajewska, Anna & Sulewski, Piotr, 2008. "Methods of Risk Protection Used by Polish Farmers," 108th Seminar, February 8-9, 2008, Warsaw, Poland 48109, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    17. Thomas Maak & Nicola M. Pless, 2006. "Responsible Leadership in a Stakeholder Society – A Relational Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 66(1), pages 99-115, June.
    18. Viglia, Giampaolo & Pera, Rebecca & Bigné, Enrique, 2018. "The determinants of stakeholder engagement in digital platforms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 404-410.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Malabika Sahoo & Sumita Mishra, 2022. "Organizational Influences on the Motivation to Transfer Soft Skill Training in an Indian Power Organization," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 47(3), pages 298-318, August.
    2. Linda D. Hollebeek & V. Kumar & Rajendra K. Srivastava & Moira K. Clark, 2023. "Moving the stakeholder journey forward," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(1), pages 23-49, January.
    3. Pantano, Eleonora & Priporas, Constantinos-Vasilios & Viassone, Milena & Migliano, Giuseppe, 2020. "Does the stakeholder engagement result in new drinks? Evidence from family owned SMEs," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 185-194.
    4. Abdulrahman Alnaim & Umar Lawal Dano & Ali M. Alqahtany, 2025. "Factors Influencing Social Interaction in Recreational Parks in Residential Neighborhoods: A Case Study of the Dammam Metropolitan Area, Saudi Arabia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-23, April.
    5. Mariasole Bannò & Emilia Filippi & Sandro Trento, 2023. "Women in top echelon positions and their effects on sustainability: a review, synthesis and future research agenda," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 27(1), pages 181-251, March.
    6. Christian Voegtlin, 2016. "What does it mean to be responsible? Addressing the missing responsibility dimension in ethical leadership research," Post-Print hal-01481471, HAL.
    7. Roberto Linzalone & Salvatore Ammirato & Alberto Michele Felicetti & Vincenzo Corvello & Francesco Santarsiero, 2025. "Exploring stakeholder engagement network behavior: Strategic and managerial implications for corporate social responsibility," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(4), pages 1201-1224, October.
    8. Veronica Scuotto & Alexeis Garcia-Perez & David E. Kalisz & Amandeep Dhir, 2024. "Responsible I(m)ovation in Asia Pacific regions," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 41(3), pages 1005-1029, September.
    9. Chen, Jiawen & Liu, Linlin, 2020. "Customer participation, and green product innovation in SMEs: The mediating role of opportunity recognition and exploitation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 151-162.
    10. Danso, Albert & Adomako, Samuel & Lartey, Theophilus & Amankwah-Amoah, Joseph & Owusu-Yirenkyi, Diana, 2020. "Stakeholder integration, environmental sustainability orientation and financial performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 652-662.
    11. Thomas Maak & Nicola M. Pless & Christian Voegtlin, 2016. "Business Statesman or Shareholder Advocate? CEO Responsible Leadership Styles and the Micro-Foundations of Political CSR," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(3), pages 463-493, May.
    12. Ranjan Chaudhuri & Sheshadri Chatterjee & Demetris Vrontis & Gianpaolo Basile, 2025. "Examining the role of knowledge sharing among stakeholders and firm innovation performance: Moderating role of technology usage," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(1), pages 43-57, January.
    13. Marco Valerio Rossi & Pasquale Sasso & Andrea Perna & Ludovico Solima, 2025. "Engaging marginal stakeholders on social networking sites. A cross‐country exploratory analysis among Generation Z consumers," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(1), pages 155-173, January.
    14. Leonardo Becchetti & Emanuele Bobbio & Federico Prizia & Lorenzo Semplici, 2022. "Going Deeper into the S of ESG: A Relational Approach to the Definition of Social Responsibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-22, August.
    15. Chiara Civera & Gabriele Santoro & Valentina Chiaudano, 2025. "Do Not Stop the Loop: Driving Circular Textiles With Technology and Stakeholder Engagement," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(5), pages 5317-5335, July.
    16. Nathalie Touratier‐Muller & Anna Cournac, 2026. "Corporate Foundations' Governance Mechanisms as a Tool for Stakeholder Engagement," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 35(1), pages 215-230, January.
    17. Nicola Pless & Thomas Maak, 2009. "Responsible Leaders as Agents of World Benefit: Learnings from “Project Ulysses”," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 85(1), pages 59-71, February.
    18. Olivier Boiral & Charles Baron & Olen Gunnlaugson, 2014. "Environmental Leadership and Consciousness Development: A Case Study Among Canadian SMEs," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 123(3), pages 363-383, September.
    19. Letizia Lo Presti & Mario Testa & Vittoria Marino & Pierpaolo Singer, 2019. "Engagement in Healthcare Systems: Adopting Digital Tools for a Sustainable Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, January.
    20. Hassan Danaeefard, 2022. "Implication studies: a methodological framework," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(5), pages 3159-3188, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:buseth:v:34:y:2025:i:4:p:1561-1575. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/26946424 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.