IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/amposc/v59y2015i3p708-723.html

The Productivity Consequences of Political Turnover: Firm‐Level Evidence from Ukraine's Orange Revolution

Author

Listed:
  • John S. Earle
  • Scott Gehlbach

Abstract

We examine the impact of political turnover on economic performance in a setting of largely unanticipated political change and profoundly weak institutions: the 2004 Orange Revolution in Ukraine. Exploiting census‐type panel data on over 7,000 manufacturing enterprises, we find that the productivity of firms in the regions most supportive of Viktor Yushchenko increased by more than 15 percentage points in the three years following his election, relative to that in the most anti‐Yushchenko regions. We conclude that this effect is driven primarily by particularistic rather than general economic policies that disproportionately increased output among large enterprises, government suppliers, and private enterprises—three types of firms that had much to gain or lose from turnover at the national level. Our results demonstrate that political turnover in the context of weak institutions can have substantial distributional effects that are reflected in economic productivity.

Suggested Citation

  • John S. Earle & Scott Gehlbach, 2015. "The Productivity Consequences of Political Turnover: Firm‐Level Evidence from Ukraine's Orange Revolution," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 59(3), pages 708-723, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:amposc:v:59:y:2015:i:3:p:708-723
    DOI: 10.1111/ajps.12170
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12170
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ajps.12170?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ishac Diwan & Philip Keefer & Marc Schiffbauer, 2020. "Pyramid capitalism: Cronyism, regulation, and firm productivity in Egypt," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 211-246, January.
    2. Huynh, Kim P. & Jacho-Chávez, David T. & Kryvtsov, Oleksiy & Shepotylo, Oleksandr & Vakhitov, Volodymyr, 2016. "The evolution of firm-level distributions for Ukrainian manufacturing firms," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 148-162.
    3. Francis,David C. & Kubinec ,Robert, 2022. "Beyond Political Connections : A Measurement Model Approach to Estimating Firm-levelPolitical Influence in 41 Economies," Policy Research Working Paper Series 10119, The World Bank.
    4. Yu, Jingwen & Mai, Dongren, 2020. "Political turnover and stock crash risk: Evidence from China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    5. Cieślik Andrzej & Michałek Jan Jakub & Gauger Iryna, 2018. "Regional dimension of firm level productivity determinants: the case of manufacturing and service firms in Ukraine," Central European Economic Journal, Sciendo, vol. 5(52), pages 81-95, January.
    6. Liangxiong Huang & Peilun Li & Xianbin Wang & Caiting Yang, 2023. "The Geographical Rotation of Local Officials and Enterprise Cross‐city Mergers and Acquisitions in China," China & World Economy, Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 31(4), pages 66-89, July.
    7. Nitsova, Silviya, 2025. "Oligarchic Networks of Influence and Legislatures in Developing Democracies: Evidence from Ukraine," OSF Preprints k27ez_v1, Center for Open Science.
    8. Ahmed, Faisal Z. & Schwab, Daniel & Werker, Eric, 2021. "The political transfer problem: How cross-border financial windfalls affect democracy and civil war," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(2), pages 313-339.
    9. Hallward-Driemeier,Mary C. & Kochanova,Anna & Rijkers,Bob, 2020. "Does Democratization Promote Competition? : Indonesian Manufacturing Pre and Post Suharto," Policy Research Working Paper Series 9112, The World Bank.
    10. Fazekas, Mihaly & Poltoratskaia, Viktoriia & Schiffbauer, Marc Tobias & Tóth, Bence, 2025. "Procuring Low Growth : The Impact of Political Favoritism on Public Procurement and Firm Performance in Bulgaria," Policy Research Working Paper Series 11085, The World Bank.
    11. Hosny Amr, 2017. "Political Stability, Firm Characteristics and Performance: Evidence from 6,083 Private Firms in the Middle East," Review of Middle East Economics and Finance, De Gruyter, vol. 13(1), pages 1-21, April.
    12. Levoshko, Tamila, 2017. ""Pork-Barrel"-Politik und das regionale Wirtschaftswachstum. Empirische Evidenz für die Ukraine und Polen," Working Papers 0642, University of Heidelberg, Department of Economics.
    13. Shi, Xiangyu & Xi, Tianyang & Zhang, Xiaobo & Zhang, Yifan, 2021. "“Moving Umbrella”: Bureaucratic transfers and the comovement of interregional investments in China," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    14. Faisal Z. Ahmed, 2022. "From grievances to civil war: The impact of geopolitics," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 427-451, July.
    15. Deng, Yuping & Wu, Yanrui & Xu, Helian, 2019. "Political turnover and firm pollution discharges: An empirical study," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    16. Jiang, Xiandeng & Kong, Dongming & Xiao, Chengrui, 2020. "Policy certainty and heterogeneous firm innovation: Evidence from China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    17. Musa Abdu & Adamu Jibir & Salihu Abdullahi & Aisha Adamu Hassan, 2021. "Drivers of manufacturing firms’ productivity: a micro-perspective to industrialization in Nigeria," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 1(2), pages 1-17, February.
    18. Andrzej Cieslik & Jan Jakub Michalek & Iryna Nasadiuk, 2015. "Determinants Of Export Performance Of Ukrainian Firms," Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 10(3), pages 91-103, September.
    19. Cieślik Andrzej & Michałek Jan Jakub & Nasadiuk Iryna, 2017. "The Regional Heterogeneity of Productivity Determinants: Evidence from Ukrainian Firms," Miscellanea Geographica. Regional Studies on Development, Sciendo, vol. 21(1), pages 44-50, March.
    20. Andrea De Meo & Lorenzo Ferrari, 2018. "Political Turnover and the Performance of Local Public Enterprises," CEIS Research Paper 438, Tor Vergata University, CEIS, revised 08 Aug 2018.
    21. Balán, Pablo & Dodyk, Juan & Puente, Ignacio, 2022. "The political behavior of family firms: Evidence from Brazil," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    22. Timm Betz & Amy Pond, 2020. "Political Ownership," Munich Papers in Political Economy 01, Munich School of Politics and Public Policy and the School of Management at the Technical University of Munich.
    23. Ahmed, Faisal Z., 2021. "Muslim conquest and institutional formation," Explorations in Economic History, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    24. Andrzej Cieślik & Iryna Gauger & Jan Jakub Michałek, 2018. "Agglomeration externalities, competition and productivity: empirical evidence from firms located in Ukraine," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 60(1), pages 213-233, January.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • H32 - Public Economics - - Fiscal Policies and Behavior of Economic Agents - - - Firm
    • D72 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Political Processes: Rent-seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior
    • P26 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Socialist and Transition Economies - - - Property Rights

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:amposc:v:59:y:2015:i:3:p:708-723. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1540-5907 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.