IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/reoecp/v17y2017i4p425-440n5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is profitability a good proxy for efficiency? Evidence from the subsector of tour operators

Author

Listed:
  • Hedija Veronika

    ()

  • Fiala Roman

    ()

  • Kuncová Martina

    () (Department of Economic Studies, College of Polytechnics Jihlava, Tolstého 16, 586 01 JihlavaCzech Republic)

Abstract

The goal of the paper is to evaluate the economic efficiency of tour operators in the Czech Republic in the period 2007-2014 using data envelopment analysis (DEA) models and prove the link between economic efficiency and profitability and to find out if profitability is a good proxy for economic efficiency. Data was exported from the database Albertina CZ Gold Edition. We calculated the efficiency score using CCR (Charnes, Cooper and Rhodes) and BCC (Banker, Charnes and Cooper) models based on 3 inputs and 1 output. In the years 2007 to 2010, the efficiency score of almost all the companies was higher than 0.5; however, in years since 2011, we revealed significant differences in the efficiency of individual firms and only about 40 percent of tour operators achieved an efficiency score higher than 0.5. Using Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients, our findings show that, in the case of the Czech tour operator market, profitability ratios do not correspond with firm efficiency. Profitability ratios are not a good proxy for economic efficiency and should not be used as the only firm criterion of performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Hedija Veronika & Fiala Roman & Kuncová Martina, 2017. "Is profitability a good proxy for efficiency? Evidence from the subsector of tour operators," Review of Economic Perspectives, Sciendo, vol. 17(4), pages 425-440, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:reoecp:v:17:y:2017:i:4:p:425-440:n:5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/revecp.2017.17.issue-4/revecp-2017-0022/revecp-2017-0022.xml?format=INT
    Download Restriction: no

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:reoecp:v:17:y:2017:i:4:p:425-440:n:5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Peter Golla). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com/services/journals .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.