IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/ijomae/v60y2024i5p366-378n1004.html

Fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis in the assessment of municipal solid waste treatment efficiency: A case study of EU countries

Author

Listed:
  • Osińska Monika

    (Institute of Informatics and Quantitative Economics, Poznań University of Economics and Business, Poznan, Poland.)

Abstract

The main objective of this article is to demonstrate how fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA) can be successfully applied to assess the conditions of municipal solid waste (MSW) treatment efficiency by comparing the results with those obtained from tobit regression modeling (TRM). TRM identifies two factors significantly determining MSW treatment efficiency: R&D expenditure and educational attainment (levels 5–8). The variables directly related to the MSW treatment process – private investment in circular economy sectors and circular material use (CMU) – turn out to be insignificant. FsQCA provides more detailed insights and shows that a high level of R&D expenditure is necessary but not sufficient to achieve a high level of MSW treatment efficiency. This means that, in addition to increasing R&D expenditure, countries need to do more to achieve a high level of MSW treatment. Moreover, fsQCA shows that both high and low levels of private investment can be a source of high MSW treatment efficiency, which explains the insignificance of private investment in the TRM. Based on the results of Qualitative Comparative Analysis, several recommendations are made in the article for countries with low MSW treatment efficiency. The research confirms that fsQCA provides a more detailed analysis than regression modeling alone.

Suggested Citation

  • Osińska Monika, 2024. "Fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis in the assessment of municipal solid waste treatment efficiency: A case study of EU countries," International Journal of Management and Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of World Economy, vol. 60(5), pages 366-378.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:ijomae:v:60:y:2024:i:5:p:366-378:n:1004
    DOI: 10.2478/ijme-2025-0005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/ijme-2025-0005
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/ijme-2025-0005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pappas, Ilias O. & Woodside, Arch G., 2021. "Fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA): Guidelines for research practice in Information Systems and marketing," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Osakwe, Christian Nedu & Ogunmokun, Oluwatobi A. & Elgammal, Islam & Kwarteng, Michael Adu, 2025. "Individuals' attitudes and their adoption intentions of central bank digital currency: Combining theories and analytics for deeper insights," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    2. Prentice, Catherine & Tianchai, Maneerat & Zeidan, Susan & Wang, Xuequn, 2025. "An asymmetrical pilot resilience model – fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 171-179.
    3. Meina Zhou & Yiqun Sun & Hao Ji, 2025. "The Impact of Financial Inclusion on Sustainable Development in China: A Panel fsQCA Analysis," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(4), pages 21582440251, December.
    4. Juying Wang & Xuelei Lian & Xin Qi, 2025. "Understanding consumers’ willingness to accept digital exhibitions in the metaverse: evidence from China," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-17, December.
    5. Shen Zhong & Zhicheng Zhou & Hongjun Jing & Daizhi Jin, 2025. "What Affects Durable National Innovation Performance? An Analysis in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(3), pages 11856-11895, September.
    6. Zheng, Yunjian & Lin, Chen & Yan, Jiale & Guo, Yani, 2025. "How to enhance the innovation capacity of technology-based enterprises: A fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    7. Acquah, Innocent Senyo Kwasi & Naude, Micheline Juliana & Oguji, Nnamdi, 2025. "Harnessing the dimensions of supply chain collaboration to promote innovation and flexibility in buyer-supplier relationships: Insights from fsQCA and NCA," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    8. Xiaoyu Bai & Shengxu Xiong & Zhe Zhou & Xin Liu, 2024. "How to Improve an Enterprise’s Innovation Capability from the Perspective of High- and Low-Level Enterprises Using Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-15, April.
    9. Xue, Biao & Lin, Yan & Ren, Fangxiao & Li, Runfo, 2024. "Business environment ecosystem and manufacturing upgrading: A configurational approach," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 1225-1237.
    10. Ben Jabeur, Sami & Boubaker, Sabri & Carmona, Pedro & Stef, Nicolae, 2025. "How do environmental concerns and global economic conditions affect energy prices?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    11. Di Paola, Nadia & Chari, Simos & Iannacci, Federico & Kraus, Sascha, 2025. "Configurational theory in business and management research: Status quo and guidelines for the application of qualitative comparative analysis (QCA)," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    12. Carla Curado & Tiago Rodrigues Gonçalves, 2026. "Happy birthday Management Review Quarterly: moving forward and improving research contributions," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 76(1), pages 1-15, February.
    13. Tolin, Giovanni & Piccaluga, Andrea, 2025. "Commercializing technology from university-industry collaborations: A configurational perspective on organizational factors," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    14. Wang, Ye & Jiang, Zongzheng & Li, Xiao & Chen, Yang & Cui, Xiao & Wang, Shipeng, 2023. "Research on antecedent configurations of enterprise digital transformation and enterprise performance from the perspective of dynamic capability," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    15. Wang, Xinyi & Beh, Loo-See, 2025. "The Yin and Yang of social media: Employing PLS-SEM, fsQCA, and NCA to assess its effects on employee work performance," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    16. Brewis, Claire & Dibb, Sally & Meadows, Maureen, 2023. "Leveraging big data for strategic marketing: A dynamic capabilities model for incumbent firms," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    17. Fernando Castelló-Sirvent & Marta Peris-Ortiz & Malar Llopis-Amorós & Pablo Pinazo-Dallenbach, 2024. "How does the COVID-19 economic crisis impact resilience? A configurational analysis of the spinoffs," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 1823-1848, September.
    18. Alshehri, Abdullah, 2025. "When the recipe is more important than the ingredients, understanding factors affecting customer loyalty in unmanned convenience store using fsQCA," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    19. Evan J. Douglas & Vidhula Venugopal, 2025. "The complex causality of gender and entrepreneurship: to grow or not to grow?," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 65(2), pages 1209-1240, August.
    20. Borozan, Dj, 2022. "Detecting a structure in the European energy transition policy instrument mix: What mix successfully drives the energy transition?," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • Q53 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Air Pollution; Water Pollution; Noise; Hazardous Waste; Solid Waste; Recycling
    • Q55 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environmental Economics: Technological Innovation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:ijomae:v:60:y:2024:i:5:p:366-378:n:1004. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sgh.waw.pl/kgs/en .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.