IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/ijcoma/v61y2025i1p202-214n1013.html

Interdisciplinary Approach to Sustainable Employee Development

Author

Listed:
  • Baran Małgorzata

    (Collegium Civitas, Pl. Defilad 1, XII p. *Warsaw 00-901)

  • Zarzycki Roland

    (Collegium Civitas, Pl. Defilad 1, XII p. *Warsaw 00-901)

Abstract

PurposeThe main cognitive goal of this paper is to examine which benefits and gains achieved by the employees are the best indicators of the sustainability of their development. The concept of research and the structure of the paper is based on the following steps: (A) conceptual analysis of the sustainability of employee development; (B) formulation of a new, interdisciplinary and multidimensional approach to the concept of sustainable development of employees; (C) empirical-research-based analysis indicating factors determining the effects of mentoring processes juxtaposed with identified dimensions of sustainable employee development. Design/methodology/approachThe following research questions have been formulated: RQ1: What is the structure of interdependencies between various mentoring effects describing employee development?; RQ2: Which of the different mentoring effects contribute to the specific dimensions of sustainable employee development? The Social Network Analysis study was carried out using traditional methods, i.e., by modelling the analyzed phenomenon using graphs, processed by the most up-to-date version of the Social Network Visualizer software. FindingsWe analyze which aspects of employees' development within the mentoring process are crucial for the sustainability of the process. We obtain these results by conducting a network analysis of a range of parameters commonly used to measure employee development, as well as aspects of mentoring processes. We have formulated a new, interdisciplinary, and multidimensional proposal for defining employee sustainability, which is the main conceptual result of the study. It allows for a holistic approach to employee sustainability within the organization's operations. Empirical analysis confirmed the multidimensionality of the mentoring process. The three groups of factors distinguished in the graph model M1 (I, II, III) correspond to the criteria distinguished in the proposed definition of sustainability of the employee development process. Practical implicationsThe intention behind this study was to explore the interdisciplinarity and multidimensionality of employee development sustainability, aiming to achieve a holistic theoretical approach that could be translated into specific, practical development goals for the organization. The development of an employee can be perceived in the broader context as sustainable employee development. There are four dimensions of such development that can be taken into consideration by employers: organizational, ethical, sociological, and psychological. Originality/valueWe propose an innovative research methodology for the perception of sustainable development among employees using Social Network Analysis (SNA).

Suggested Citation

  • Baran Małgorzata & Zarzycki Roland, 2025. "Interdisciplinary Approach to Sustainable Employee Development," International Journal of Contemporary Management, Sciendo, vol. 61(1), pages 202-214.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:ijcoma:v:61:y:2025:i:1:p:202-214:n:1013
    DOI: 10.2478/ijcm-2025-0014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/ijcm-2025-0014
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/ijcm-2025-0014?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Baran, Małgorzata & Zarzycki, Roland, 2021. "Key effects of mentoring processes — multi-tool comparative analysis of the career paths of mentored employees with non-mentored employees," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 1-11.
    2. Chung-Jen Wang & Kuan-Ju Tseng, 2019. "Effects of Selected Positive Resources on Hospitality Service Quality: The Mediating Role of Work Engagement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-17, April.
    3. Jihye Park & Dawoon Jung & Pyoungsoo Lee, 2019. "How to Make a Sustainable Manufacturing Process: A High-Commitment HRM System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-20, April.
    4. Karianne Kalshoven & Deanne Den Hartog & Annebel De Hoogh, 2011. "Ethical Leader Behavior and Big Five Factors of Personality," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 100(2), pages 349-366, May.
    5. Shao-Long Li & Fang Sun & Mingze Li, 2019. "Sustainable Human Resource Management Nurtures Change-Oriented Employees: Relationship between High-Commitment Work Systems and Employees’ Taking Charge Behaviors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-15, June.
    6. Zhai, Qingguo & Wang, Saifang & Weadon, Helen, 2020. "Thriving at work as a mediator of the relationship between workplace support and life satisfaction," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 26(2), pages 168-184, March.
    7. Thomas Dyllick & Kai Hockerts, 2002. "Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 11(2), pages 130-141, March.
    8. Barbara Mazur & Anna Walczyna, 2020. "Bridging Sustainable Human Resource Management and Corporate Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-21, October.
    9. Jyoti, Jeevan & Rani, Asha, 2019. "Role of burnout and mentoring between high performance work system and intention to leave: Moderated mediation model," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 166-176.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shao-Long Li & Fang Sun & Mingze Li, 2019. "Sustainable Human Resource Management Nurtures Change-Oriented Employees: Relationship between High-Commitment Work Systems and Employees’ Taking Charge Behaviors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-15, June.
    2. Nagamani Subramanian & M. Suresh, 2022. "Social Sustainability Factors Influencing the Implementation of Sustainable HRM in Manufacturing SMEs," Humanistic Management Journal, Springer, vol. 7(3), pages 469-507, December.
    3. Wang, Sheng & Hu, Changya & Pham, Mai & Yu, Hsiang Pin, 2025. "Encouraging newcomer voice through mentoring support: The mediating role of trust and the moderating role of power distance orientation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    4. Ualison Rébula de Oliveira & Rodolfo Pombo Menezes & Vicente Aprigliano Fernandes, 2024. "A systematic literature review on corporate sustainability: contributions, barriers, innovations and future possibilities," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 3045-3079, February.
    5. Gaitree Ramgolam & Needesh Ramphul & Hemant Chittoo, 2025. "Sustainable Human Resource Management—A Systematic Literature Review and Directions for Future Research," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(3), pages 11407-11444, September.
    6. Fatih Akbaş & Ferudun Kaya, 2022. "Investigation of Financial Performance Indicators Affecting Corporate Sustainability of Participation Banks," Journal of Finance Letters (Maliye ve Finans Yazıları), Maliye ve Finans Yazıları Yayıncılık Ltd. Şti., vol. 37(117), pages 159-176, April.
    7. Ioana Gutu & Daniela Tatiana Agheorghiesei & Alexandru Tugui, 2023. "Assessment of a Workforce Sustainability Tool through Leadership and Digitalization," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-30, January.
    8. Jung Eon Kwon & Hyung Rok Woo, 2017. "The Impact of Flipped Learning on Cooperative and Competitive Mindsets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-15, December.
    9. Rambaud, Alexandre & Richard, Jacques, 2015. "The “Triple Depreciation Line” instead of the “Triple Bottom Line”: Towards a genuine integrated reporting," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 92-116.
    10. Maria Björklund & Helena Forslund, 2019. "Challenges Addressed by Swedish Third-Party Logistics Providers Conducting Sustainable Logistics Business Cases," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-15, May.
    11. Merriam Haffar & Cory Searcy, 2018. "Target‐setting for ecological resilience: Are companies setting environmental sustainability targets in line with planetary thresholds?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(7), pages 1079-1092, November.
    12. Pishchulov, Grigory & Trautrims, Alexander & Chesney, Thomas & Gold, Stefan & Schwab, Leila, 2019. "The Voting Analytic Hierarchy Process revisited: A revised method with application to sustainable supplier selection," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 166-179.
    13. Priyanka Aggarwal & Archana Singh & Deepali Malhotra, 2025. "ESG Implementation in Indian NIFTY 500 Companies: A Comprehensive Multi-case Analysis of Strategy, Implementation, and Value Creation," South Asian Journal of Business and Management Cases, , vol. 14(3), pages 243-260, December.
    14. Florentina Moisescu, 2025. "Sustainability and Financial Performance: Exploring the Interconnections Through the Accounting Perspective in Romania," Economics and Applied Informatics, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 2, pages 250-257.
    15. Mara Del Baldo & Maria-Gabriella Baldarelli, 2017. "Renewing and improving the business model toward sustainability in theory and practice," International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 2(1), pages 1-13, December.
    16. Per Engelseth & Richard Glavee-Geo & Artur Janusz & Enoch Niboi, 2020. "The Emergent Nature of Networked Sustainable Procurement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-18, December.
    17. Francesco Di Maddaloni & Roya Derakhshan, 2019. "A Leap from Negative to Positive Bond. A Step towards Project Sustainability," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-19, June.
    18. Simone Carmine & Valentina De Marchi, 2023. "Reviewing Paradox Theory in Corporate Sustainability Toward a Systems Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 184(1), pages 139-158, April.
    19. Bert Scholtens & Feng‐Ching Kang, 2013. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Earnings Management: Evidence from Asian Economies," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(2), pages 95-112, March.
    20. Hsueh, Che-Fu, 2014. "Improving corporate social responsibility in a supply chain through a new revenue sharing contract," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 214-222.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:ijcoma:v:61:y:2025:i:1:p:202-214:n:1013. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.