IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/ecoman/v17y2025i2p90-105n1006.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-project buffer setting and dynamic monitoring of a critical chain based on comprehensive factors

Author

Listed:
  • Bu Zhuzhen

    (College of Biomass Science and Engineering, Sichuan University, 24 South Section 1, 1st Ring Road, Chengdu, China)

  • Meng Hu

    (Shanghai Yangtze Delta Innovation Institute, 14-15 Yunfei Building, No. 257 Xiangke Road, Pudong New Area, Shanghai, China)

Abstract

The paper introduces a new multi-factor critical chain buffer estimation model and designs a dynamic monitoring method based on the project elements. A literature analysis determined a research gap and a research problem. It was found that the existing methods offer scarce collaborative studies on buffer setting and monitoring and insufficient research on buffer setting considering project economic indicators. However, these topics are often given priority consideration in practical engineering applications. Therefore, the study proposes a multi-factor critical chain buffer setting and its dynamic monitoring method. The planning stage analyses the impact of income, resources, and probability of success on buffer size setting and defines the calculation model of capacity constraint buffer. The execution stage dynamically sets buffer monitoring points according to the progress of project implementation, monitors the remaining buffer amount at the completion of each activity on the critical chain, and takes corresponding actions to ensure that the progress is controllable. The method was applied in a multi-project of a Chinese software enterprise. To further verify the effectiveness of this research, the method is compared with the traditional static buffer monitoring method (TBMM) and the relative buffer monitoring method (RBMM), and the construction period of the real project is simulated through the computer program for analysis. Results show that the research method can reduce unreasonable buffer settings, enhance the robustness of a buffer against complex environments, and reduce the probability of false warnings in the monitoring process.

Suggested Citation

  • Bu Zhuzhen & Meng Hu, 2025. "Multi-project buffer setting and dynamic monitoring of a critical chain based on comprehensive factors," Engineering Management in Production and Services, Sciendo, vol. 17(2), pages 90-105.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:ecoman:v:17:y:2025:i:2:p:90-105:n:1006
    DOI: 10.2478/emj-2025-0014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/emj-2025-0014
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/emj-2025-0014?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bredael, Dries & Vanhoucke, Mario, 2024. "A genetic algorithm with resource buffers for the resource-constrained multi-project scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 315(1), pages 19-34.
    2. Tukel, Oya I. & Rom, Walter O. & Eksioglu, Sandra Duni, 2006. "An investigation of buffer sizing techniques in critical chain scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 172(2), pages 401-416, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wendi Tian & Erik Demeulemeester, 2014. "Railway scheduling reduces the expected project makespan over roadrunner scheduling in a multi-mode project scheduling environment," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 213(1), pages 271-291, February.
    2. Junguang Zhang & Xiwei Song & Hongyu Chen & Ruixia (Sandy) Shi, 2016. "Determination of critical chain project buffer based on information flow interactions," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 67(9), pages 1146-1157, September.
    3. Yan Zhao & Nanfang Cui & Wendi Tian, 2020. "A two-stage approach for the critical chain project rescheduling," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 285(1), pages 67-95, February.
    4. Junguang Zhang & Dan Wan, 2021. "Determination of early warning time window for bottleneck resource buffer," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 300(1), pages 289-305, May.
    5. Janusz Kulejewski & Nabi Ibadov & Jerzy Rosłon & Jacek Zawistowski, 2021. "Cash Flow Optimization for Renewable Energy Construction Projects with a New Approach to Critical Chain Scheduling," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-15, September.
    6. Hazır, Öncü & Ulusoy, Gündüz, 2020. "A classification and review of approaches and methods for modeling uncertainty in projects," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    7. Seyed Ashkan Zarghami, 2024. "Project schedule contingency planning: Building on von Bertalanffy's open systems theory and critical systems practice," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(2), pages 247-261, March.
    8. Zhang, Jingwen & Elmaghraby, Salah E., 2014. "The relevance of the “alphorn of uncertainty” to the financial management of projects under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 238(1), pages 65-76.
    9. Dorota Kuchta, 2010. "Generalization of the critical chain method supporting the management of projects with a high degree of uncertainty and imperfect information," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 20(2), pages 77-90.
    10. Abdul Razaque & Christian Bach & Nyembo salama & Aziz Alotaibi, 2012. "Fostering Project Scheduling and Controlling Risk Management," Papers 1210.2021, arXiv.org.
    11. She, Bingling & Chen, Bo & Hall, Nicholas G., 2021. "Buffer sizing in critical chain project management by network decomposition," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    12. Xuejun Hu & Jianjiang Wang & Kaijun Leng, 2019. "The Interaction Between Critical Chain Sequencing, Buffer Sizing, and Reactive Actions in a CC/BM Framework," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 36(03), pages 1-22, June.
    13. HazIr, Öncü & Haouari, Mohamed & Erel, Erdal, 2010. "Robust scheduling and robustness measures for the discrete time/cost trade-off problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(2), pages 633-643, December.
    14. Mohammadreza Sharifi Ghazvini & Vahidreza Ghezavati & Sadigh Raissi & Ahmad Makui, 2017. "An Integrated Efficiency–Risk Approach in Sustainable Project Control," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-20, September.
    15. Junguang Zhang & Xiwei Song & Estrella Díaz, 2017. "Critical chain project buffer sizing based on resource constraints," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(3), pages 671-683, February.
    16. Yangyang Liang & Nanfang Cui & Tian Wang & Erik Demeulemeester, 2019. "Robust resource-constrained max-NPV project scheduling with stochastic activity duration," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 41(1), pages 219-254, March.
    17. Sung-Hwan Jo & Eul-Bum Lee & Kyoung-Youl Pyo, 2018. "Integrating a Procurement Management Process into Critical Chain Project Management (CCPM): A Case-Study on Oil and Gas Projects, the Piping Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-22, May.
    18. Asadabadi, Mehdi Rajabi & Zwikael, Ofer, 2021. "Integrating risk into estimations of project activities' time and cost: A stratified approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 291(2), pages 482-490.
    19. Guofeng Ma & Shan Jiang & Tiancheng Zhu & Jianyao Jia, 2019. "A Novel Method of Developing Construction Projects Schedule under Rework Scenarios," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-25, October.
    20. Zhang, Junguang & Song, Xiwei & Díaz, Estrella, 2016. "Project buffer sizing of a critical chain based on comprehensive resource tightness," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(1), pages 174-182.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:ecoman:v:17:y:2025:i:2:p:90-105:n:1006. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.