IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i18p5795-d635129.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cash Flow Optimization for Renewable Energy Construction Projects with a New Approach to Critical Chain Scheduling

Author

Listed:
  • Janusz Kulejewski

    (Civil Engineering Faculty, Warsaw University of Technology, Armii Ludowej 16, 00-637 Warszawa, Poland)

  • Nabi Ibadov

    (Civil Engineering Faculty, Warsaw University of Technology, Armii Ludowej 16, 00-637 Warszawa, Poland)

  • Jerzy Rosłon

    (Civil Engineering Faculty, Warsaw University of Technology, Armii Ludowej 16, 00-637 Warszawa, Poland)

  • Jacek Zawistowski

    (Polish Association of Building Managers, Emili Plater 18, 00-688 Warszawa, Poland)

Abstract

This study concerns the use of the critical chain method to schedule the construction of renewable energy facilities. The critical chain method is recognized as a useful project management tool, transforming a stochastic problem of uncertainty in activity durations into a deterministic one. However, this method has some shortcomings. There are no clear principles of grouping non-critical activities into feeding chains. Another ambiguity is sizing the feeding buffers with regard to the topology of the network model and the resulting dependencies between activities, located in different chains. As a result, it is often necessary to arbitrarily adjust the calculated sizes of feeding buffers before inserting them into the schedule. The authors present the new approach to sizing the time buffers in the schedule, enabling a quick assessment of the quality of a given solution variant and finding a solution that best meets the established criteria, conditions, and constraints. The essence of the presented approach is the two-step sizing of time buffers with the use of deterministic optimization and stochastic optimization techniques. Taking into account construction management needs, the optimization criteria are based on the construction project cash flow analysis. The effectiveness of the presented approach is illustrated by an example of developing a wind power plant construction schedule. According to the results, the presented approach ensures the protection of the scheduled completion date of the construction and the stability of the schedule.

Suggested Citation

  • Janusz Kulejewski & Nabi Ibadov & Jerzy Rosłon & Jacek Zawistowski, 2021. "Cash Flow Optimization for Renewable Energy Construction Projects with a New Approach to Critical Chain Scheduling," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-15, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:18:p:5795-:d:635129
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/18/5795/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/18/5795/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Al-Fawzan, M. A. & Haouari, Mohamed, 2005. "A bi-objective model for robust resource-constrained project scheduling," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(2), pages 175-187, May.
    2. Lambrechts, Olivier & Demeulemeester, Erik & Herroelen, Willy, 2008. "A tabu search procedure for developing robust predictive project schedules," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(2), pages 493-508, February.
    3. Tavares, L. Valadares & Antunes Ferreira, J. A. & Silva Coelho, J., 1998. "On the optimal management of project risk," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 107(2), pages 451-469, June.
    4. Jerzy Rosłon & Mariola Książek-Nowak & Paweł Nowak, 2020. "Schedules Optimization with the Use of Value Engineering and NPV Maximization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-20, September.
    5. Jerzy Rosłon & Mariola Książek-Nowak & Paweł Nowak & Jacek Zawistowski, 2020. "Cash-Flow Schedules Optimization within Life Cycle Costing (LCC)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-14, October.
    6. Tukel, Oya I. & Rom, Walter O. & Eksioglu, Sandra Duni, 2006. "An investigation of buffer sizing techniques in critical chain scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 172(2), pages 401-416, July.
    7. James Bleeg & Mark Purcell & Renzo Ruisi & Elizabeth Traiger, 2018. "Wind Farm Blockage and the Consequences of Neglecting Its Impact on Energy Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-20, June.
    8. Kobylanski, Przemyslaw & Kuchta, Dorota, 2007. "A note on the paper by M. A. Al-Fawzan and M. Haouari about a bi-objective problem for robust resource-constrained project scheduling," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(2), pages 496-501, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. HazIr, Öncü & Haouari, Mohamed & Erel, Erdal, 2010. "Robust scheduling and robustness measures for the discrete time/cost trade-off problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(2), pages 633-643, December.
    2. Hazır, Öncü & Ulusoy, Gündüz, 2020. "A classification and review of approaches and methods for modeling uncertainty in projects," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    3. Öncü Hazir & Gündüz Ulusoy, 2020. "A classification and review of approaches and methods for modeling uncertainty in projects," Post-Print hal-02898162, HAL.
    4. HazIr, Öncü & Erel, Erdal & Günalay, Yavuz, 2011. "Robust optimization models for the discrete time/cost trade-off problem," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(1), pages 87-95, March.
    5. Said, Samer S. & Haouari, Mohamed, 2015. "A hybrid simulation-optimization approach for the robust Discrete Time/Cost Trade-off Problem," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 259(C), pages 628-636.
    6. Xiong, Jian & Xing, Li-ning & Chen, Ying-wu, 2013. "Robust scheduling for multi-objective flexible job-shop problems with random machine breakdowns," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(1), pages 112-126.
    7. Lin, B.M.T. & Liu, S.T., 2008. "Maximizing the reward in the relocation problem with generalized due dates," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(1), pages 55-63, September.
    8. Hartmann, Sönke & Briskorn, Dirk, 2010. "A survey of variants and extensions of the resource-constrained project scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(1), pages 1-14, November.
    9. Mengqi Zhao & Xiaoling Wang & Jia Yu & Lei Bi & Yao Xiao & Jun Zhang, 2020. "Optimization of Construction Duration and Schedule Robustness Based on Hybrid Grey Wolf Optimizer with Sine Cosine Algorithm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-17, January.
    10. Hartmann, Sönke & Briskorn, Dirk, 2008. "A survey of variants and extensions of the resource-constrained project scheduling problem," Working Paper Series 02/2008, Hamburg School of Business Administration (HSBA).
    11. Yangyang Liang & Nanfang Cui & Tian Wang & Erik Demeulemeester, 2019. "Robust resource-constrained max-NPV project scheduling with stochastic activity duration," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 41(1), pages 219-254, March.
    12. KIlIç, Murat & Ulusoy, Gündüz & Serifoglu, Funda Sivrikaya, 2008. "A bi-objective genetic algorithm approach to risk mitigation in project scheduling," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(1), pages 202-216, March.
    13. Bruni, M.E. & Di Puglia Pugliese, L. & Beraldi, P. & Guerriero, F., 2017. "An adjustable robust optimization model for the resource-constrained project scheduling problem with uncertain activity durations," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 66-84.
    14. Xue Li & Zhengwen He & Nengmin Wang & Mario Vanhoucke, 2022. "Multimode time-cost-robustness trade-off project scheduling problem under uncertainty," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 43(5), pages 1173-1202, July.
    15. Farnaz Torabi Yeganeh & Seyed Hessameddin Zegordi, 2020. "A multi-objective optimization approach to project scheduling with resiliency criteria under uncertain activity duration," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 285(1), pages 161-196, February.
    16. Janusz Kulejewski & Jerzy Rosłon, 2023. "Optimization of Ecological and Economic Aspects of the Construction Schedule with the Use of Metaheuristic Algorithms and Artificial Intelligence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-26, January.
    17. Wendi Tian & Erik Demeulemeester, 2014. "Railway scheduling reduces the expected project makespan over roadrunner scheduling in a multi-mode project scheduling environment," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 213(1), pages 271-291, February.
    18. Servranckx, Tom & Vanhoucke, Mario, 2019. "Strategies for project scheduling with alternative subgraphs under uncertainty: similar and dissimilar sets of schedules," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 279(1), pages 38-53.
    19. Junguang Zhang & Xiwei Song & Hongyu Chen & Ruixia (Sandy) Shi, 2016. "Determination of critical chain project buffer based on information flow interactions," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 67(9), pages 1146-1157, September.
    20. Morteza Davari & Erik Demeulemeester, 2019. "The proactive and reactive resource-constrained project scheduling problem," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 211-237, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:18:p:5795-:d:635129. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.