IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/accjnl/v29y2023i2p71-83n1006.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Framework for a Valuation of Digital Start-Ups Using Artificial Intelligence and Fuzzy Sets

Author

Listed:
  • Pešík Jiří

    (University of West Bohemia, Faculty of Economics, Department of Business Administration and Management, Univerzitní 22, 306 14, Plzeň, Czech Republic)

  • Procházková Petra Taušl

    (University of West Bohemia, Faculty of Economics, Department of Business Administration and Management, Univerzitní 22, 306 14, Plzeň, Czech Republic)

  • Januška Martin

    (University of West Bohemia, Faculty of Economics, Department of Business Administration and Management, Univerzitní 22, 306 14, Plzeň, Czech Republic)

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to present an innovative framework for assessing digital start-ups and smaller companies using a fuzzy set approach, considering the founder’s expertise, product marketability, financial health, and social media presence. Four Czech digital startups were analyzed by both human experts and an artificial intelligence model. The methodology is based on using a fuzzy additive ratio assessment. Each start-up was evaluated on a five-point scale, with the results compared to Deloitte’s FAST 50 rank. The AI and human evaluations differed, with humans placing more emphasis on the founder’s experience and product appeal. As a practical contribution, the article suggests a valuation framework involving both human and AI expertise for interactive comparison and update. The article highlights the value of AI in start-up assessment, stressing the necessity of merging human and artificial intelligence in decision-making. To date of the publication, no study combining human expertise and artificial intelligence using fuzzy sets was found. Therefore, both methodology and results can be considered innovative and original.

Suggested Citation

  • Pešík Jiří & Procházková Petra Taušl & Januška Martin, 2023. "A Framework for a Valuation of Digital Start-Ups Using Artificial Intelligence and Fuzzy Sets," ACC Journal, Sciendo, vol. 29(2), pages 71-83.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:accjnl:v:29:y:2023:i:2:p:71-83:n:1006
    DOI: 10.2478/acc-2023-0006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/acc-2023-0006
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/acc-2023-0006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sonja Bettina Keppler & Marieta Olaru & Georgiana Marin, 2015. "Fostering Entrepreneurial Investment Decision in Medical Technology Ventures in a Changing Business Environment," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 17(38), pages 390-390, February.
    2. Goumas, M. & Lygerou, V., 2000. "An extension of the PROMETHEE method for decision making in fuzzy environment: Ranking of alternative energy exploitation projects," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 123(3), pages 606-613, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marco Rogna, 2019. "A First-Phase Screening Device for Site Selection of Large-Scale Solar Plants with an Application to Italy," BEMPS - Bozen Economics & Management Paper Series BEMPS57, Faculty of Economics and Management at the Free University of Bozen.
    2. Aikaterini Papapostolou & Charikleia Karakosta & Kalliopi-Anastasia Kourti & Haris Doukas & John Psarras, 2019. "Supporting Europe’s Energy Policy Towards a Decarbonised Energy System: A Comparative Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-26, July.
    3. M. Beaulieu & P. Lehoux, 2019. "The emergence of health technology organizations among institutional healthcare and economic actors," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 1115-1151, December.
    4. Hernandez-Perdomo, Elvis A. & Mun, Johnathan & Rocco S., Claudio M., 2017. "Active management in state-owned energy companies: Integrating a real options approach into multicriteria analysis to make companies sustainable," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 487-502.
    5. Athanasios Kolios & Varvara Mytilinou & Estivaliz Lozano-Minguez & Konstantinos Salonitis, 2016. "A Comparative Study of Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making Methods under Stochastic Inputs," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-21, July.
    6. G Özerol & E Karasakal, 2008. "Interactive outranking approaches for multicriteria decision-making problems with imprecise information," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 59(9), pages 1253-1268, September.
    7. Kangas, Annika S. & Kangas, Jyrki, 2004. "Probability, possibility and evidence: approaches to consider risk and uncertainty in forestry decision analysis," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 6(2), pages 169-188, March.
    8. Mahsa Montajabiha, 2016. "An Extended PROMETHE II Multi-Criteria Group Decision Making Technique Based on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Logic for Sustainable Energy Planning," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 221-244, March.
    9. Madlener, Reinhard & Stagl, Sigrid, 2005. "Sustainability-guided promotion of renewable electricity generation," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(2), pages 147-167, April.
    10. Jan Macháč & Lenka Zaňková, 2020. "Renewables—To Build or Not? Czech Approach to Impact Assessment of Renewable Energy Sources with an Emphasis on Municipality Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-15, December.
    11. Gitinavard, Hossein & Mousavi, S. Meysam & Vahdani, Behnam, 2017. "Soft computing based on hierarchical evaluation approach and criteria interdependencies for energy decision-making problems: A case study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 556-577.
    12. Dayo-Olupona, Oluwatobi & Genc, Bekir & Onifade, Moshood, 2020. "Technology adoption in mining: A multi-criteria method to select emerging technology in surface mines," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    13. Gamboa, Gonzalo & Munda, Giuseppe, 2007. "The problem of windfarm location: A social multi-criteria evaluation framework," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 1564-1583, March.
    14. Seddiki, Mohammed & Bennadji, Amar, 2019. "Multi-criteria evaluation of renewable energy alternatives for electricity generation in a residential building," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 101-117.
    15. An, Da & Xi, Beidou & Ren, Jingzheng & Wang, Yue & Jia, Xiaoping & He, Chang & Li, Zhiwei, 2017. "Sustainability assessment of groundwater remediation technologies based on multi-criteria decision making method," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 36-46.
    16. PrasannaVenkatesan, S. & Goh, M., 2016. "Multi-objective supplier selection and order allocation under disruption risk," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 124-142.
    17. Kurka, Thomas & Blackwood, David, 2013. "Selection of MCA methods to support decision making for renewable energy developments," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 225-233.
    18. Blanco, G. & Amarilla, R. & Martinez, A. & Llamosas, C. & Oxilia, V., 2017. "Energy transitions and emerging economies: A multi-criteria analysis of policy options for hydropower surplus utilization in Paraguay," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 312-321.
    19. Luciane Graziele Pereira Ferrero & Sergio Luiz Monteiro Salles-Filho, 2025. "Planning and resource allocation models in research‐intensive universities: budget allocation and the search for excellence," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-15, December.
    20. San Cristóbal, José Ramón, 2012. "A goal programming model for the optimal mix and location of renewable energy plants in the north of Spain," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(7), pages 4461-4464.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:accjnl:v:29:y:2023:i:2:p:71-83:n:1006. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.