IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/url/upravl/v12y2021i6p33-48.html

Municipal strategizing methodology: Comparative analysis and unification

Author

Listed:
  • Ivan A. Antipin

    (Ural State University of Economics, Ekaterinburg, Russia)

  • Natalya Yu. Vlasova

    (Ural State University of Economics, Ekaterinburg, Russia)

  • Olga Yu. Ivanova

    (Ural State University of Economics, Ekaterinburg, Russia)

Abstract

Tackling the current issues in the strategic planning system of the Russian Federation through providing recommendations for the improvement of the municipal strategizing is among the most topical challenges. The paper deals with the unification of the methodological approaches to the formation (development, updating) of a municipal strategy for the socio-economic development, theoretically substantiates the stages of effective strategizing, and gives recommendations for organizing and improving this process. The theoretical provisions of institutionalism, strategic management, regional and municipal economics and administration, political science, sociology, planning and forecasting constitute the methodological framework of the study. The key peculiarities of the research methodology are (i) the application of a set of approaches highlighting the change in the municipal strategic planning system under the influence of theoretical views that prevail at a particular time, and (ii) the substantiation of the criteria for analyzing the strategic planning process. A wide range of research methods, such as logical, dialectical, cause-and-effect and comparative analysis were used. The authors propose the criteria for mapping out a territory’s socio-economic strategy, and presents their theoretical basis and practical implementation in various cities and countries. We also work out a step-by-step algorithm for municipal strategizing, which covers not only the process of forming a strategy for the socio-economic development, but also the process of its coordination with other strategic planning documents, as well as the necessary analytical and preparatory activities. The theoretical importance of the study is to prove the feasibility of applying uniform rules for strategizing the municipal development. The practical significance is due to the high need to coordinate the municipal strategies with one another and with those at other hierarchical levels in order to ensure the unity of the strategic planning system in the Russian Federation.

Suggested Citation

  • Ivan A. Antipin & Natalya Yu. Vlasova & Olga Yu. Ivanova, 2021. "Municipal strategizing methodology: Comparative analysis and unification," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 12(6), pages 33-48, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:url:upravl:v:12:y:2021:i:6:p:33-48
    DOI: 10.29141/2218-5003-2021-12-6-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://upravlenets.usue.ru/images/94/3.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://upravlenets.usue.ru/en/issues-2021/916
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.29141/2218-5003-2021-12-6-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Raine Mäntysalo & Johanna Tuomisaari & Kaisa Granqvist & Vesa Kanninen, 2019. "The Strategic Incrementalism of Lahti Master Planning: Three Lessons," Planning Theory & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(4), pages 555-572, August.
    2. Agatino Rizzo & Abdolrasoul Habibipour & Anna Ståhlbröst, 2021. "Transformative thinking and urban living labs in planning practice: a critical review and ongoing case studies in Europe," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(10), pages 1739-1757, October.
    3. Yakov P. SILIN & Yelena B. DVORYADKINA & Ivan A. ANTIPIN, 2018. "The priorities of the strategic development of a new industrial city," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 9(6), pages 2-16, December.
    4. Therese Bjärstig & Camilla Thellbro & Olof Stjernström & Johan Svensson & Camilla Sandström & Per Sandström & Anna Zachrisson, 2018. "Between protocol and reality – Swedish municipal comprehensive planning," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(1), pages 35-54, January.
    5. Åge Johnsen, 2018. "Impacts of strategic planning and management in municipal government: an analysis of subjective survey and objective production and efficiency measures in Norway," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(3), pages 397-420, March.
    6. Ivan A. Antipin & Natalya Yu. Vlasova & Olga Yu. Ivanova, 2020. "Strategic priorities for managing spatial inequalities in the socio-economic development of the Russian regions," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 11(6), pages 29-43, December.
    7. N. V. Zubarevich., 2019. "Spatial Development Strategy: Priorities and instruments," VOPROSY ECONOMIKI, N.P. Redaktsiya zhurnala "Voprosy Economiki", vol. 1.
    8. Uri Avin & Robert Goodspeed, 2020. "Using Exploratory Scenarios in Planning Practice," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 86(4), pages 403-416, October.
    9. John M. Bryson & Lauren Hamilton Edwards & David M. Van Slyke, 2018. "Getting strategic about strategic planning research," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(3), pages 317-339, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guyadeen, Dave & Henstra, Daniel & Kaup, Shivani & Wright, Grace, 2023. "Evaluating the quality of municipal strategic plans," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    2. I. A. Antipin & N. Yu. Vlasova, 2020. "Incremental approach to regional strategising: Theory, methodology, practices," Journal of New Economy, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 21(3), pages 73-90, October.
    3. Johan Svensson & Wiebke Neumann & Therese Bjärstig & Anna Zachrisson & Camilla Thellbro, 2020. "Landscape Approaches to Sustainability—Aspects of Conflict, Integration, and Synergy in National Public Land-Use Interests," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-23, June.
    4. Cecilie Sachs Olsen & Merlijn van Hulst, 2024. "Reimagining Urban Living Labs: Enter the Urban Drama Lab," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 61(6), pages 991-1012, May.
    5. Pavel Aleksandrovich Minakir, 2019. "Far Eastern Institutional Novations: Imitation of a New Stage," Spatial Economics=Prostranstvennaya Ekonomika, Economic Research Institute, Far Eastern Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences (Khabarovsk, Russia), issue 1, pages 7-17.
    6. A. A. Pankratov & E. A. Kuvshinova & L. S. Galstyan, 2021. "Quantitative Assessment of the Socioeconomic Potential of Advanced Development Territories of Regions of the Far Eastern Federal District," Studies on Russian Economic Development, Springer, vol. 32(4), pages 407-414, July.
    7. L. V. Melnikova, 2022. "Efficiency and Equality: Twenty Years of Discussion on Spatial Development," Regional Research of Russia, Springer, vol. 12(4), pages 439-450, December.
    8. I. P. Glazyrina & L. M. Faleychik & A. A. Faleychik, 2023. "Cross-Border Cooperation in the East of Russia: Foreign Direct Investment," Regional Research of Russia, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 98-106, December.
    9. Francesca Imperiale & Alessandro Sancino & Roberta Fasiello & Paolo Ricci, 2024. "Governing public heritage assets with civil society: exploring the typologies of collaboration by the dominant actor," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 28(4), pages 1151-1197, December.
    10. Darya S. Bents, 2021. "The effectiveness of a territory’s spatial development as an indicator of regional authorities performance: The case of Chelyabinsk oblast," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 12(6), pages 49-66, October.
    11. Jacinta Barrins & Peter C McKeown & Una Murray & Charles Spillane, 2025. "What constitutes “institutional arrangements” for Member State reporting within the UNFCCC and Paris Agreement?," PLOS Climate, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(1), pages 1-25, January.
    12. James Wan & Ling Wang & Raafat Saade & Hong Guan & Hao Liu, 2022. "Empirical Analysis of Strategic Management in Inter-Governmental Organization," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-26, July.
    13. Karachurina, L. & Mkrtchyan, N., 2023. "Population dynamics of large cities, their suburbs, and periphery in Russia during the intercensal period of 2011-2021," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 61(4), pages 93-109.
    14. I. P. Glazyrina & L. M. Faleychik & A. A. Faleychik, 2021. "Institutional Policy and the Role of Foreign Direct Investment in the Far East of Russia," Regional Research of Russia, Springer, vol. 11(4), pages 625-637, October.
    15. Johan Högström & Peter Brokking & Berit Balfors & Monica Hammer, 2021. "Approaching Sustainability in Local Spatial Planning Processes: A Case Study in the Stockholm Region, Sweden," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-19, March.
    16. Tamara Dimitrijevska-Markoski & J. Dallas Breen & Julius A. Nukpezah & Robert Mobley, 2021. "Strategic Planning and Management in Small Municipalities in Mississippi – Implementation, Perceived Benefits, and Determinants of Use," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 437-452, September.
    17. Darren Sierhuis & Luca Bertolini & Willem Van Winden, 2024. "“Recovering†the political: Unpacking the implications of (de)politicization for the transformative capacities of urban experiments," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 42(2), pages 303-321, March.
    18. Chen, Xiaoyu & Zheng, Lin & Cai, Guotian & Qi, Xiaoling & He, Jiaxin, 2025. "Promoting innovation: Policy impacts on global hydrogen value chain," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    19. Giles Thomson & Henrik Ny & Varvara Nikulina & Sven Borén & James Ayers & Jayne Bryant, 2020. "‘Rapid Scenario Planning’ to Support a Regional Sustainability Transformation Vision: A Case Study from Blekinge, Sweden," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-26, August.
    20. Alessandro Fergnani & John A. Sweeney, 2021. "Identity Wind Tunneling: A method for discovering an organization’s strategic identity using scenarios," Futures & Foresight Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 3(3-4), September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • P41 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Other Economic Systems - - - Planning, Coordination, and Reform
    • R50 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Regional Government Analysis - - - General
    • R58 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Regional Government Analysis - - - Regional Development Planning and Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:url:upravl:v:12:y:2021:i:6:p:33-48. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Victor Blaginin (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/usueeru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.