IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/url/izvest/v21y2020i1p29-52.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Structural growth policy in Russia: Resources, technology-intensity, risk, and industrialisation

Author

Listed:
  • O. S. Sukharev

    (Institute of Economics of RAS, Moscow, Russia)

  • E. N. Voronchikhina

    (Perm State National Research University, Perm, Russia)

Abstract

One way to overcome resource constraints in the Russian economy, which could boost its efficiency, is implementing measures of structural policy that affect resource movement. The paper studies opportunities of growth through the development of the manufacturing sector and movement of the resources between sectors. Methodologically the research relies on the Keynesian approach to economic growth, which is of structural nature and appears to be the most relevant for scrutinizing structural specifics of growth and resources distribution within the economy. In terms of methods, the paper applies structural analysis and uses elements of econometric modelling. General and special industrialisation criteria allow establishing whether the economy is industrial by structure or by the level of technological development. On the basis of the obtained models the authors judge how the sectors’ risk profitability ratio impacts on the movement of capital and labour between them. The findings reveal that if the structural policy affects the ratio between risk and profitability, as well as the level of sector’s technology-intensity due to spurring investment into new technologies (under decrease in risk), the manufacturing sector will receive an additional resource, improve its dynamics, and increase its contribution to GDP growth. The scenario forecast of the industrialisation criteria depending on the risk in the manufacturing sector points to the conclusion that the risk is to be diminished to raise the contribution of the manufacturing sector to GDP growth and simultaneously intensify the technological industrialisation.

Suggested Citation

  • O. S. Sukharev & E. N. Voronchikhina, 2020. "Structural growth policy in Russia: Resources, technology-intensity, risk, and industrialisation," Journal of New Economy, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 21(1), pages 29-52, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:url:izvest:v:21:y:2020:i:1:p:29-52
    DOI: 10.29141/2658-5081-2020-21-1-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://jne.usue.ru/images/download/86/2.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://jne.usue.ru/ru/2020/849
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.29141/2658-5081-2020-21-1-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Guido Buenstorf & Uwe Cantner & Horst Hanusch & Michael Hutter & Hans-Walter Lorenz & Fritz Rahmeyer (ed.), 2013. "The Two Sides of Innovation," Economic Complexity and Evolution, Springer, edition 127, number 978-3-319-01496-8, December.
    2. Brinca, Pedro, 2014. "Distortions in the neoclassical growth model: A cross-country analysis," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 1-19.
    3. Romano, Livio & Traù, Fabrizio, 2017. "The nature of industrial development and the speed of structural change," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 26-37.
    4. Alonso-Carrera, Jaime & Raurich, Xavier, 2018. "Labor mobility, structural change and economic growth," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 292-310.
    5. Saviotti, Pier Paolo & Pyka, Andreas & Jun, Bogang, 2016. "Education, structural change and economic development," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 55-68.
    6. Banerjee, Kuntal, 2017. "Suppes–Sen maximality of cyclical consumption: The neoclassical growth model," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 51-65.
    7. Teixeira, Aurora A.C. & Queirós, Anabela S.S., 2016. "Economic growth, human capital and structural change: A dynamic panel data analysis," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(8), pages 1636-1648.
    8. Carroll, Daniel R. & Young, Eric R., 2018. "Neoclassical inequality," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 83-109.
    9. Vu, K.M., 2017. "Structural change and economic growth: Empirical evidence and policy insights from Asian economies," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 64-77.
    10. Dosi, Giovanni & Roventini, Andrea & Russo, Emanuele, 2019. "Endogenous growth and global divergence in a multi-country agent-based model," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 101-129.
    11. Zeira, Joseph & Zoabi, Hosny, 2015. "Economic growth and sector dynamics," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 1-15.
    12. Chen, Shiyi & Jefferson, Gary H. & Zhang, Jun, 2011. "Structural change, productivity growth and industrial transformation in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 133-150, March.
    13. Alonso-Carrera, Jaime & Raurich, Xavier, 2015. "Demand-based structural change and balanced economic growth," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 359-374.
    14. Roberto Samaniego & Juliana Sun, 2016. "Productivity Growth and Structural Transformation," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 21, pages 266-285, July.
    15. Andergassen, Rainer & Nardini, Franco & Ricottilli, Massimo, 2017. "Innovation diffusion, general purpose technologies and economic growth," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 72-80.
    16. Oleg S. Sukharev, 2018. "Structural Analysis of Technological Changes and the Strategy of Economic Growth," Journal of New Economy, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 19(3), pages 26-41, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dmitry O. Skobelev, 2020. "Industrial policy of increasing resource efficiency and the achievement of the sustainable development goals," Journal of New Economy, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 21(4), pages 153-173, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhou, Xiaoxiao & Cai, Ziming & Tan, Kim Hua & Zhang, Linling & Du, Juntao & Song, Malin, 2021. "Technological innovation and structural change for economic development in China as an emerging market," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    2. Oleg Sukharev, 2021. "Measuring the Contribution of the “Knowledge Economy” to the Economic Growth Rate: Comparative Analysis," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 12(4), pages 1809-1829, December.
    3. Wolfgang Britz & Roberto Roson, 2018. "Exploring Long Run Structural Change with a Dynamic General Equilibrium Model," Working Papers 2018: 12, Department of Economics, University of Venice "Ca' Foscari".
    4. Zhang, Pingdan & Yuan, Haoming & Bai, Fuli & Tian, Xin & Shi, Feng, 2018. "How do carbon dioxide emissions respond to industrial structural transitions? Empirical results from the northeastern provinces of China," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 145-154.
    5. Zhou, Xiaoxiao & Pan, Zixuan & Shahbaz, Muhammad & Song, Malin, 2020. "Directed technological progress driven by diversified industrial structural change," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 112-129.
    6. O. Sukharev S. & О. Сухарев С., 2019. "Структурная политика: к новой инвестиционной модели экономического роста // Structural Policy: Towards a New Investment Model of Economic Growth," Финансы: теория и практика/Finance: Theory and Practice // Finance: Theory and Practice, ФГОБУВО Финансовый университет при Правительстве Российской Федерации // Financial University under The Government of Russian Federation, vol. 23(2), pages 84-104.
    7. Orlando Gomes, 2021. "Growth theory under heterogeneous heuristic behavior," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 31(2), pages 533-571, April.
    8. O. Sukharev S. & О. Сухарев С., 2019. "Некоторые императивы экономического лидерства России: развитие науки // Some Imperatives of the Russian Economic Leadership: The Development of Science," Экономика. Налоги. Право // Economics, taxes & law, ФГОБУ "Финансовый университет при Правительстве Российской Федерации" // Financial University under The Government of Russian Federation, vol. 12(3), pages 25-36.
    9. Comunale, Mariarosaria & Felice, Giulia, 2022. "Trade and structural change: An empirical investigation," International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 58-79.
    10. Shujahat Haider Hashmi & Fan Hongzhong & Zeeshan Fareed & Roksana Bannya, 2020. "Testing Non-Linear Nexus between Service Sector and CO 2 Emissions in Pakistan," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-29, January.
    11. Oleg S. SUKHAREV, 2019. "Managing the technological development structure: Risk and “interest portfolio”," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 10(1), pages 2-15, March.
    12. Jaime Alonso-Carrera & Giulia Felice & Xavier Raurich, 2018. "Inequality and Structural Change under Non-Linear Engels' Curve," UB School of Economics Working Papers 2018/374, University of Barcelona School of Economics.
    13. Norbu, Nyingtob Pema & Tateno, Yusuke & Bolesta, Andrzej, 2021. "Structural transformation and production linkages in Asia-Pacific least developed countries: An input-output analysis," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 510-524.
    14. Oleg S. Sukharev, 2020. "Inflation control and adequacy of targeting to economic growth policy," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 11(1), pages 33-44, March.
    15. Yu Liu & Fangchen Shi & Hongman He & Liyin Shen & Wenzhu Luo & Lingyun Sun, 2021. "Study on the Matching Degree between Land Resources Carrying Capacity and Industrial Development in Main Cities of Xinjiang, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-17, September.
    16. Mariarosaria Comunale & Giulia Felice, 2019. "An empirical investigation of the relationship between trade and structural change," Bank of Lithuania Working Paper Series 62, Bank of Lithuania.
    17. Natalia I. Doré & Aurora A. C. Teixeira, 2023. "Empirical Literature on Economic Growth, 1991–2020: Uncovering Extant Gaps and Avenues for Future Research," Global Journal of Emerging Market Economies, Emerging Markets Forum, vol. 15(1), pages 7-37, January.
    18. Patrick Mellacher, 2021. "Growth, Inequality and Declining Business Dynamism in a Unified Schumpeter Mark I + II Model," Papers 2111.09407, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2023.
    19. Naima Chrid & Sami Saafi & Mohamed Chakroun, 2021. "Export Upgrading and Economic Growth: a Panel Cointegration and Causality Analysis," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 12(2), pages 811-841, June.
    20. Shaukat, Badiea & Zhu, Qigui & Khan, M. Ijaz, 2019. "Real interest rate and economic growth: A statistical exploration for transitory economies," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 534(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    economic growth; economic sector; structural proportions; resource movement; technology-intensity; risk; industrialisation; general industrialisation criteria; special industrialization criteria;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O14 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Industrialization; Manufacturing and Service Industries; Choice of Technology
    • O47 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity - - - Empirical Studies of Economic Growth; Aggregate Productivity; Cross-Country Output Convergence
    • O57 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economywide Country Studies - - - Comparative Studies of Countries

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:url:izvest:v:21:y:2020:i:1:p:29-52. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Victor Blaginin (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/usueeru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.