IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/unt/jnapdj/v19y2012i1p1-35.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The economic relations of China and India with Pakistan: a comparative analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Pravakar Sahoo

    (Associate Professor, Institute of Economic Growth (IEG), Delhi University, Delhi, India)

Abstract

In recent years China has taken several steps to improve trade and investment relations with Pakistan, including, among others, the signing of a bilateral free trade agreement (FTA) in 2006. Trade between the two countries has increased manifold, which, in turn, has resulted in a huge gap between the amount of trade China engages in with Pakistan compared with India. This slowing of India-Pakistan economic relations vis-?-vis China-Pakistan coupled with strained and uncertain political relations is a cause for concern. In this context, the present study examines trade and investment relations between China and Pakistan and analyses factors that have led to the growing presence of China in Pakistan vis-?-vis India. India has lost out to China in many important industries due to non-tariff barriers and non-economic factors. In addition, China scores over India in scale economies, price competitiveness and trade complementarity.

Suggested Citation

  • Pravakar Sahoo, 2012. "The economic relations of China and India with Pakistan: a comparative analysis," Asia-Pacific Development Journal, United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP), vol. 19(1), pages 1-35, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:unt:jnapdj:v:19:y:2012:i:1:p:1-35
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.unescap.org/sites/default/files/chap-1-Pravakar_0.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pascha, Werner, 2002. "Economic relations between Germany and Japan: An analysis of recent data," Duisburg Working Papers on East Asian Economic Studies 61, University Duisburg-Essen, Asia-Pacific Economic Research Institute (FIP).
    2. Nisha Taneja, 2006. "India - Pakistan Trade," Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations, New Delhi Working Papers 182, Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations, New Delhi, India.
    3. F. Gerard Adams & Byron Gangnes & Yochanan Shachmurove, 2006. "Why is China so Competitive? Measuring and Explaining China's Competitiveness," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 95-122, February.
    4. Mohsin S. Khan, 2009. "India-Pakistan Trade: A Roadmap for Enhancing Economic Relations," Policy Briefs PB09-15, Peterson Institute for International Economics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Arsalan Ahmed & Qi Jian Hong & Hassan Tahir, 2021. "Analysis of Pakistan–China FTA by propensity score matching with difference in differences," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 1(7), pages 1-29, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Saima Gul & Shaukat & Shaista Gohar, 2018. "Pakistan and India Trade Potential," Global Regional Review, Humanity Only, vol. 3(1), pages 208-221, June.
    2. Dilip Das, 2008. "Repositioning the Chinese economy on the global economic stage," International Review of Economics, Springer;Happiness Economics and Interpersonal Relations (HEIRS), vol. 55(4), pages 401-417, December.
    3. Ari Van Assche & Chang Hong & Veerle Slootmaekers, 2008. "China's International Competitiveness: Reassessing the Evidence," LICOS Discussion Papers 20508, LICOS - Centre for Institutions and Economic Performance, KU Leuven.
    4. Moritz Cruz, 2008. "Can Free Trade Guarantee Gains from Trade?," WIDER Working Paper Series RP2008-97, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    5. Díaz-Bonilla, Carolina, 2007. "Poverty and Income Distribution Under Different Factor Market Assumptions: A Macro-Micro Model," Conference papers 331625, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    6. Ahmed, Saira & Ahmed, Vaqar & Sohail, Safdar, 2010. "Trade agreements between developing countries: a case study of Pakistan - Sri Lanka free trade agreement," MPRA Paper 29209, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Yochanan Shachmurove & Uriel Spiegel, 2006. "Technological Improvements and Comparative Advantage Reconsidered," PIER Working Paper Archive 06-023, Penn Institute for Economic Research, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania.
    8. repec:kap:iaecre:v:16:y:2010:i:1:p:11-23 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Pragya Bhawsar & Utpal Chattopadhyay, 2015. "Competitiveness: Review, Reflections and Directions," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 16(4), pages 665-679, August.
    10. Zakee SAADAT & Dawood MAMOON, 2016. "Destination EU and USA: Improving Export Potential of Pakistan by Trading with India," Journal of Economics and Political Economy, KSP Journals, vol. 3(4), pages 659-669, December.
    11. Wim Naudé & Stephanié Rossouw, 2010. "Early international entrepreneurship in China: Extent and determinants," Journal of International Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 87-111, March.
    12. Myint Moe Chit & Marian Rizov & Dirk Willenbockel, 2010. "Exchange Rate Volatility and Exports: New Empirical Evidence from the Emerging East Asian Economies," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 239-263, February.
    13. Caporale, Guglielmo Maria & Sova, Anamaria & Sova, Robert, 2015. "Trade flows and trade specialisation: The case of China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 261-273.
    14. Altaf Hussain Kira, 2011. "Cross-LoC trade in Kashmir: From line of control to line of commerce," Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Mumbai Working Papers 2011-020, Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Mumbai, India.
    15. Rutzer, Christian, 2014. "From the Loser to the Winner - How Trade Liberalization can lead to Leapfrogging between Countries," VfS Annual Conference 2014 (Hamburg): Evidence-based Economic Policy 100313, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    16. Wim Naudé, 2009. "'Rushing in where Angels Fear to Tread?': The Early Internationalization of Indigenous Chinese Firms," WIDER Working Paper Series RP2009-27, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    17. Resmini, Laura, 2006. "Theoretical and Methodological Study on Comparative Advantages in Dynamic Growth Regions, Convergence and Inequalities Patterns," Papers DYNREG03, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI).
    18. Nasrullah, Muhammad & Chang, Liu & Khan, Khalid & Rizwanullah, Muhammad & Zulfiqar, Farah & Ishfaq, Muhammad, 2020. "Determinants of forest product group trade by gravity model approach: A case study of China," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    19. Hae-du Hwang & Xiangshuo Yin, 2008. "Recent developments on RTAs in North East Asia," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 6(3), pages 455-466, November.
    20. Nisha Taneja & Samridhi Bimal & Isha Dayal, 2016. "India’s Informal Trade with Pakistan," Working Papers id:11076, eSocialSciences.
    21. Junshi Li & Yao Pan, 2023. "EU and China’s comparative advantage, trade complementarity and trade specialization dynamics in agricultural products," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 351-379, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Trade; investment; comparative advantage; trade complimentarity; trade barriers;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F14 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Empirical Studies of Trade
    • F18 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Trade and Environment

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:unt:jnapdj:v:19:y:2012:i:1:p:1-35. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Macroeconomic Policy and Development Division, ESCAP (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/escapth.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.