IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ulp/buopee/v39y2018m12i5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Initiative « une ceinture et une route » : implications économiques pour l’Union européenne

Author

Listed:
  • Meixing Dai

    (Université de Strasbourg (BETA))

  • Ke Dai

    (Institut d’études commerciales, Université Hohai)

  • Gengxin Dai

    (Institut d’études commerciales, Université de Qingdao)

Abstract

L’Initiative « une Ceinture et une Route », lancée en 2013 par le président chinois Xi Jingping, vise à créer de nouvelles routes de la soie pour mieux relier la Chine à l’Asie du Sud-Est, à l’Europe en passant par l’Asie centrale, au Proche-Orient, à l’Afrique et à l’Amérique du Sud, à la fois par voies terrestre et maritime. Cette initiative aux dimensions multiples dotée des fonds colossaux pourrait avoir des impacts importants et durables sur l’économie mondiale. Ses effets économiques positifs sur l’Union européenne (UE) seraient plus ou moins importants selon les réponses politiques européennes.

Suggested Citation

  • Meixing Dai & Ke Dai & Gengxin Dai, 2018. "Initiative « une ceinture et une route » : implications économiques pour l’Union européenne," Bulletin de l'Observatoire des politiques économiques en Europe, Observatoire des Politiques Économiques en Europe (OPEE), vol. 39(1), pages 25-38, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:ulp:buopee:v:39:y:2018:m:12:i:5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://opee.unistra.fr/Initiative-une-ceinture-et-une-route-implications-economiques-pour-l-Union
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Li-Gang Liu, 2016. "Europe and China in the Global Economy in the Next 50 Years: A Partnership for Global Peace and Stability," Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics;Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), vol. 51(1), pages 37-42, January.
    2. Li-Gang Liu, 2016. "Europe and China in the Global Economy in the Next 50 Years: A Partnership for Global Peace and Stability," Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics;Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), vol. 51(1), pages 37-42, January.
    3. Zhai, Fan, 2018. "China’s belt and road initiative: A preliminary quantitative assessment," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 84-92.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Eric Rugraff, 2019. "La politique industrielle de l’UE face à son décrochage technologique," Bulletin de l'Observatoire des politiques économiques en Europe, Observatoire des Politiques Économiques en Europe (OPEE), vol. 41(1), pages 33-45, November.
    2. Eric Rugraff, 2019. "La politique industrielle de l’UE face à son décrochage technologique," Post-Print hal-04031324, HAL.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liu, Haiyun & Islam, Mollah Aminul & Khan, Muhammad Asif & Hossain, Md Ismail & Pervaiz, Khansa, 2020. "Does financial deepening attract foreign direct investment? Fresh evidence from panel threshold analysis," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    2. Krishna Chaitanya Vadlamannati & Yuanxin Li & Samuel Brazys & Alexander Dukalskis, 2019. "Building Bridges or Breaking Bonds? The Belt and Road Initiative and Foreign Aid Competition," Working Papers 201906, Geary Institute, University College Dublin.
    3. Wang, Hao & Han, Yonghui & Fidrmuc, Jan & Wei, Dongming, 2021. "Confucius Institute, Belt and Road Initiative, and Internationalization," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 237-256.
    4. de Soyres, François & Mulabdic, Alen & Ruta, Michele, 2020. "Common transport infrastructure: A quantitative model and estimates from the Belt and Road Initiative," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    5. Yuan, Qianqian & Baležentis, Tomas & Shen, Zhiyang & Streimikiene, Dalia, 2021. "Economic and environmental performance of the belt and road countries under convex and nonconvex production technologies," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    6. Koffi Dumor & Yao Li & Ma Yongkai & Enock Mintah Ampaw & Hafez Komla Dumor, 2022. "Evaluating the belt and road initiative effects on trade and migration: Evidence from the East African community," African Development Review, African Development Bank, vol. 34(1), pages 16-28, March.
    7. Dylan Sutherland & John Anderson & Nicholas Bailey & Ilan Alon, 0. "Policy, institutional fragility, and Chinese outward foreign direct investment: An empirical examination of the Belt and Road Initiative," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 0, pages 1-24.
    8. Kwang-Jing Yii & Kai-Ying Bee & Wei-Yong Cheam & Yee-Lee Chong & Ching-Mei Lee, 2018. "Is Transportation Infrastructure Important to the One Belt One Road (OBOR) Initiative? Empirical Evidence from the Selected Asian Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-18, November.
    9. Koffi Dumor & Li Yao, 2019. "Estimating China’s Trade with Its Partner Countries within the Belt and Road Initiative Using Neural Network Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-22, March.
    10. L. Kostecka-Tomaszewska & K. Czerewacz-Filipowicz, 2019. "Poland – A Gate to the EU or a Bottleneck in the Belt and Road Initiative," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 472-492.
    11. Jeffrey B. Nugent & Jiaxuan Lu, 2020. "Does the All-China Federation of Industry and Commerce Align Private Firms with the Goals of the People's Republic of China's Belt and Road Initiative?," Asian Development Review, MIT Press, vol. 37(2), pages 45-76, September.
    12. Yang, Yiwen & Lin, Chinho, 2021. "Impact of the “Belt and Road Initiative” on machinery production networks," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    13. Jianping Li & Yinhong Yao & Yuanjie Xu & Jingyu Li & Lu Wei & Xiaoqian Zhu, 2019. "Consumer’s risk perception on the Belt and Road countries: evidence from the cross-border e-commerce," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 823-840, December.
    14. Razzaq, Asif & An, Hui & Delpachitra, Sarath, 2021. "Does technology gap increase FDI spillovers on productivity growth? Evidence from Chinese outward FDI in Belt and Road host countries," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    15. Nangia, Rita, 2019. "Securing Asia's energy future with regional integration," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 1262-1273.
    16. Mingchun Cao & Ilan Alon, 2020. "Intellectual Structure of the Belt and Road Initiative Research: A Scientometric Analysis and Suggestions for a Future Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-40, August.
    17. Galán Enrique Martínez & Leandro Francisco José, 2019. "The Belt and Road Initiative: The Cornerstone of the New-Fangled Financial Institutionalism Led by China," TalTech Journal of European Studies, Sciendo, vol. 9(2), pages 153-182, September.
    18. Bojan Beškovnik & Marko Golnar, 2020. "Eliminating Barriers for Sustainable Transport Systems on Maritime Silk Road and Baltic–Adriatic Corridor under BRI," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-18, September.
    19. Qianqian, Li & Yijun, Liu, 2020. "The China-Pakistan economic corridor: The Pakistani media attitudes perspective," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    20. Hongxing Cao & Huirong Zhan & Yuan Wang & Ziyao Wei, 2021. "Sino-Bulgarian Economic Relations in the Post Pandemic World," Economic Alternatives, University of National and World Economy, Sofia, Bulgaria, issue 2, pages 177-196, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ulp:buopee:v:39:y:2018:m:12:i:5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/opstrfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.