IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tsj/stataj/v10y2010i4p540-567.html

Fitting heterogeneous choice models with oglm

Author

Listed:
  • Richard Williams

    (University of Notre Dame)

Abstract

When a binary or ordinal regression model incorrectly assumes that er- ror variances are the same for all cases, the standard errors are wrong and (unlike ordinary least squares regression) the parameter estimates are biased. Hetero- geneous choice models (also known as location–scale models or heteroskedastic ordered models) explicitly specify the determinants of heteroskedasticity in an at- tempt to correct for it. Such models are also useful when the variance itself is of substantive interest. This article illustrates how the author’s Stata program oglm (ordinal generalized linear models) can be used to fit heterogeneous choice and related models. It shows that two other models that have appeared in the liter- ature (Allison’s model for group comparisons and Hauser and Andrew’s logistic response model with proportionality constraints) are special cases of a heteroge- neous choice model and alternative parameterizations of it. The article further argues that heterogeneous choice models may sometimes be an attractive alterna- tive to other ordinal regression models, such as the generalized ordered logit model fit by gologit2. Finally, the article offers guidelines on how to interpret, test, and modify heterogeneous choice models. Copyright 2010 by StataCorp LP.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard Williams, 2010. "Fitting heterogeneous choice models with oglm," Stata Journal, StataCorp LLC, vol. 10(4), pages 540-567, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:tsj:stataj:v:10:y:2010:i:4:p:540-567
    Note: to access software from within Stata, net describe http://www.stata-journal.com/software/sj10-4/st0208/
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.stata-journal.com/article.html?article=st0208
    File Function: link to article purchase
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ben Jann, 2005. "Making regression tables from stored estimates," Stata Journal, StataCorp LLC, vol. 5(3), pages 288-308, September.
    2. Yatchew, Adonis & Griliches, Zvi, 1985. "Specification Error in Probit Models," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 67(1), pages 134-139, February.
    3. J. Scott Long & Jeremy Freese, 2006. "Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables using Stata, 2nd Edition," Stata Press books, StataCorp LLC, edition 2, number long2, March.
    4. Rory Wolfe & William Gould, 1998. "An approximate likelihood-ratio test for ordinal response models," Stata Technical Bulletin, StataCorp LLC, vol. 7(42).
    5. Richard Williams, 2006. "Generalized ordered logit/partial proportional odds models for ordinal dependent variables," Stata Journal, StataCorp LLC, vol. 6(1), pages 58-82, March.
    6. Paul D. Allison, 1999. "Comparing Logit and Probit Coefficients Across Groups," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 28(2), pages 186-208, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Charlie Tchinda & Marcus Dejardin, 2021. "Are Business Policy Measures in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic to Be Equally Valued? An Exploration According to SMEs Owners’ Business Expectations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-42, October.
    2. Richard Williams, 2009. "Using Heterogeneous Choice Models to Compare Logit and Probit Coefficients Across Groups," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 37(4), pages 531-559, May.
    3. Wixe, Sofia & Nilsson, Pia & Naldi, Lucia & Westlund, Hans, 2017. "Disentangling Innovation in Small Food Firms: The role of External Knowledge, Support, and Collaboration," Working Paper Series in Economics and Institutions of Innovation 446, Royal Institute of Technology, CESIS - Centre of Excellence for Science and Innovation Studies.
    4. Chakravorty, Swastika & Goli, Srinivas, 2021. "Family Structure, Economic Outcomes and Perceived Change in Economic Well-being in India," OSF Preprints 23kvs, Center for Open Science.
    5. Biagetti, Marco & Scicchitano, Sergio, 2009. "Inequality in workers’ lifelong learning across european countries: Evidence from EU-SILC data-set," MPRA Paper 17356, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Xindong Xue & W. Robert Reed, 2015. "The Relationship Between Social Capital And Health In China," Working Papers in Economics 15/05, University of Canterbury, Department of Economics and Finance.
    7. Zhongda Li & Jianhao Lin & Lu Liu, 2020. "Occupational attainment and stratification in China: The interactive effects of social networks and the hukou system," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(3), pages 1167-1192, August.
    8. Sofia Wixe & Pia Nilsson & Lucia Naldi & Hans Westlund, 2023. "Correction to: The role of collaboration and external knowledge for innovation in small food firms," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 70(1), pages 157-157, February.
    9. Chonnikarn (Fern) Jira & Michael W. Toffel, 2013. "Engaging Supply Chains in Climate Change," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 15(4), pages 559-577, October.
    10. Jeannette Rüge & Anja Broda & Sabina Ulbricht & Gudrun Klein & Hans-Jürgen Rumpf & Ulrich John & Christian Meyer, 2010. "Workplace smoking restrictions: smoking behavior and the intention to change among continuing smokers," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 55(6), pages 599-608, December.
    11. Isphording, Ingo E. & Otten, Sebastian, 2014. "Linguistic barriers in the destination language acquisition of immigrants," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 30-50.
    12. Elvire Guillaud, 2013. "Preferences for redistribution: an empirical analysis over 33 countries," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 11(1), pages 57-78, March.
    13. Hanna Dudek & Joanna Myszkowska-Ryciak, 2022. "Food Insecurity in Central-Eastern Europe: Does Gender Matter?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-18, April.
    14. Frondel, Manuel & Simora, Michael & Sommer, Stephan, 2017. "Risk Perception of Climate Change: Empirical Evidence for Germany," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 173-183.
    15. Zakir Husain & Swagata Sarkar, 2011. "Gender Disparities in Educational Trajectories in India: Do Females Become More Robust at Higher Levels?," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 101(1), pages 37-56, March.
    16. Kaminski, Robert J. & Koons-Witt, Barbara A. & Thompson, Norma Stewart & Weiss, Douglas, 2010. "The impacts of the Virginia Tech and Northern Illinois University shootings on fear of crime on campus," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 88-98, January.
    17. Katrina Lintukangas & Heli Arminen & Anni-Kaisa Kähkönen & Elina Karttunen, 2023. "Determinants of Supply Chain Engagement in Carbon Management," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 186(1), pages 87-104, August.
    18. Herstad, Sverre J., 2015. "Imitate, or innovate and collaborate? On innovation strategy choices in the urban economy," Papers in Innovation Studies 2015/8, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    19. Tolulope Paul Akinbobola & Oluwole Matthew Akinnagbe, 2023. "Determinants of linkages between agricultural institutions and agro-allied industries in Southwest, Nigeria," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 228-248, January.
    20. Andor, Mark A. & Schmidt, Christoph M. & Sommer, Stephan, 2018. "Climate Change, Population Ageing and Public Spending: Evidence on Individual Preferences," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 173-183.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tsj:stataj:v:10:y:2010:i:4:p:540-567. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F. Baum or Lisa Gilmore (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.stata-journal.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.