IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tec/journl/v44y2023i1p416-435.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Technostress, anxiety, and coping strategies in online teaching among nurse educators

Author

Listed:
  • Melania S. Banaticla

    (Graduate School, University of Perpetual Help System.)

  • Antonio R. Yango

    (Graduate School, University of Perpetual Help System.)

Abstract

The use of technology in educational processes accompanies adaptation issues due to the rapid development and cost of technology, internet connectivity, need for electricity, suitable space at home and sufficient knowledge in navigating online platforms (Munoz, et. al., 2020). The goal of this study is to determine the technostress, anxiety, and coping strategies in online teaching of nurse educators in universities and colleges of nursing in Laguna. Further, the study probed the relationship between respondents' level of technostress and level of anxiety, level of technostress and coping strategies, and level of anxiety and coping strategies. The findings revealed that the level of technostress among nurse educators in Laguna was low, have a mild level of anxiety, and very high in utilizing coping strategies. There was a significant relationship between the respondents' level of technostress and level of anxiety, as the probability values of 0.006 (learning-teaching and profession oriented), 0.039 (technical oriented), 0.008 (personal-oriented), and 0.001 (social-oriented) were less than the 0.01 and 0.05 significance level respectively, thus implied that the lower the respondents' level of technostress the more the respondents' have mild anxiety, there was no significant relationship between the respondents' level of technostress and coping strategies, as the probability values 0.586 (learning-teaching process oriented), 0.211 (profession oriented), 0.960 (technical oriented), 0.506 (personal oriented), and 0.297 (social oriented) are more than 0.05 significance level, this implied that the hypothesis that there is no significant relationship between the respondent's level of technostress and coping strategies was accepted, and lastly, there was no significant relationship between the respondents' level of anxiety and coping strategies, as the probability value 0.192 is more than 0.05 significance level, therefore, the hypothesis that there is no significant relationship between the respondent's level of anxiety and coping strategies was accepted.

Suggested Citation

  • Melania S. Banaticla & Antonio R. Yango, 2023. "Technostress, anxiety, and coping strategies in online teaching among nurse educators," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 44(1), pages 416-435, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:tec:journl:v:44:y:2023:i:1:p:416-435
    DOI: 10.47577/tssj.v44i1.8939
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://techniumscience.com/index.php/socialsciences/article/view/8939/3300
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://techniumscience.com/index.php/socialsciences/article/view/8939
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.47577/tssj.v44i1.8939?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Syed Ghulam Meran Shah & Muddassar Sarfraz & Larisa Ivascu, 2021. "Assessing the interrelationship corporate environmental responsibility, innovative strategies, cognitive and hierarchical CEO: A stakeholder theory perspective," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(1), pages 457-473, January.
    2. Giorgia Bondanini & Gabriele Giorgi & Antonio Ariza-Montes & Alejandro Vega-Muñoz & Paola Andreucci-Annunziata, 2020. "Technostress Dark Side of Technology in the Workplace: A Scientometric Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-23, October.
    3. Anastasia Petrakova & Tatjana Kanonire & Alena Kulikova & Ekaterina Orel, 2021. "Characteristics of Teacher Stress during Distance Learning Imposed by the COVID‑19 Pandemic," Voprosy obrazovaniya / Educational Studies Moscow, National Research University Higher School of Economics, issue 1, pages 93-114.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peter Mantello & Manh-Tung Ho & Minh-Hoang Nguyen & Quan-Hoang Vuong, 2023. "Machines that feel: behavioral determinants of attitude towards affect recognition technology—upgrading technology acceptance theory with the mindsponge model," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-16, December.
    2. Yusen Dong & Senhua Chen & Yixue Wu, 2023. "Keeping up with the Joneses: The role of investee peers corporate environmental responsibility," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(4), pages 1841-1855, July.
    3. Yingkai Tang & Aswad Akram & Lucian‐Ionel Cioca & Syed Ghulam Meran Shah & Muhammad Asim Ali Qureshi, 2021. "Whether an innovation act as a catalytic moderator between corporate social responsibility performance and stated owned and non‐state owned enterprises' performance or not? An evidence from Pakistani ," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(3), pages 1127-1141, May.
    4. Hafiz Muhammad Arslan & Ye Chengang & Bilal & Muhammad Siddique & Yusra Yahya, 2022. "Influence of Senior Executives Characteristics on Corporate Environmental Disclosures: A Bibliometric Analysis," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-21, March.
    5. Prem Borle & Kathrin Reichel & Fiona Niebuhr & Susanne Voelter-Mahlknecht, 2021. "How Are Techno-Stressors Associated with Mental Health and Work Outcomes? A Systematic Review of Occupational Exposure to Information and Communication Technologies within the Technostress Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-19, August.
    6. María del Carmen Rey-Merchán & Antonio López-Arquillos, 2022. "Occupational Risk of Technostress Related to the Use of ICT among Teachers in Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-11, July.
    7. Annamaria Porru & Raffaele Dicataldo & Irene Leo & Maja Roch & Daniela Lucangeli, 2022. "Back to School: Italian Teachers’ Perceptions of the Impact of COVID-19 on Personal and Social Well-Being and Teaching Methods," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-20, September.
    8. Ho, Manh-Tung & Mantello, Peter & Ghotbi, Nader & Nguyen, Minh-Hoang & Nguyen, Hong-Kong T. & Vuong, Quan-Hoang, 2022. "Rethinking technological acceptance in the age of emotional AI: Surveying Gen Z (Zoomer) attitudes toward non-conscious data collection," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    9. Reetta Oksa & Tiina Saari & Markus Kaakinen & Atte Oksanen, 2021. "The Motivations for and Well-Being Implications of Social Media Use at Work among Millennials and Members of Former Generations," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-22, January.
    10. Elisabeth Rohwer & Joelle-Cathrin Flöther & Volker Harth & Stefanie Mache, 2022. "Overcoming the “Dark Side” of Technology—A Scoping Review on Preventing and Coping with Work-Related Technostress," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-30, March.
    11. Carla Estrada-Muñoz & Alejandro Vega-Muñoz & Dante Castillo & Sheyla Müller-Pérez & Joan Boada-Grau, 2021. "Technostress of Chilean Teachers in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic and Teleworking," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-14, May.
    12. Ştefan-Alexandru Catană & Sorin-George Toma & Andreea Barbu, 2021. "The Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Teleworking and Education in a Romanian Higher Education Institution: An Internal Stakeholders Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-17, August.
    13. Prem Borle & Kathrin Reichel & Susanne Voelter-Mahlknecht, 2021. "Is There a Sampling Bias in Research on Work-Related Technostress? A Systematic Review of Occupational Exposure to Technostress and the Role of Socioeconomic Position," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-22, February.
    14. Emanuela Ingusci & Fulvio Signore & Claudio Giovanni Cortese & Monica Molino & Paola Pasca & Enrico Ciavolino, 2023. "Development and validation of the Remote Working Benefits & Disadvantages scale," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(2), pages 1159-1183, April.
    15. Alejandro Vega-Muñoz & Carla Estrada-Muñoz & Paola Andreucci-Annunziata & Nicolas Contreras-Barraza & Heidi Bilbao-Cotal, 2022. "Validation of a Measurement Scale on Technostress for University Students in Chile," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-14, November.
    16. Shinu Vig, 2024. "Environmental disclosures by Indian companies: role of board characteristics and board effectiveness," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(1), pages 16-31, March.
    17. Óscar. R. González-López & María Buenadicha-Mateos & M. Isabel Sánchez-Hernández, 2021. "Overwhelmed by Technostress? Sensitive Archetypes and Effects in Times of Forced Digitalization," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-20, April.
    18. Ruiqian Li & Ramakrishnan Ramanathan & Guanghua Xu, 2023. "The impact of penalties for environmental violations on corporate environmental responsibility," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(3), pages 1343-1363, June.
    19. Gabriele Giorgi & Antonio Ariza-Montes & Nicola Mucci & Antonio L. Leal-Rodríguez, 2022. "The Dark Side and the Light Side of Technology-Related Stress and Stress Related to Workplace Innovations: From Artificial Intelligence to Business Transformations," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-5, January.
    20. Zhang, Wei & Qin, Chu & Zhang, Wenyao, 2023. "Top management team characteristics, technological innovation and firm's greenwashing: Evidence from China's heavy-polluting industries," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Technostress; Anxiety; Coping Strategies; Online Teaching; Nurse Educators;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tec:journl:v:44:y:2023:i:1:p:416-435. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tasente Tanase (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.